Redistricting Panel Down to 60!

September 27, 2010 - By admin

Anthony Pignataro:

And now, for a bit of good news for our embattled Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, whose poll numbers are currently at the same level enjoyed by Gray Davis shortly because his 2003 recall election. The California State Auditor’s Applicant Review Panel (CSAARP, I guess) has finally whittled down Redistricting Commissioner applications to 60.

Redistricting! Everyone cares about Redistricting! Right?

“The final pool of 60 also represents all regions of the state and California’s rich diversity: 51 percent are male and 48 percent are female and nearly 33 percent white, 28 percent Latino, 17 percent Asian, 13 percent Black, 7 percent American Indian or Alaskan Native and 2 percent Pacific Islanders,” states this Sept. 24 Redistricting Commission press release. “Twenty of the applicants are Democrats, 20 are Republicans, and 20 either Decline-to-State or belong to another party.”

Woohoo! Let the Elimination Rounds begin!

The review panel began begin with an astonishing 31,000 applications. Guess the chance to sit on a panel of 14 and draw all the state’s Assembly, Senate and Board of Equalization districts is the in thing these days. Democrats began crying foul when it was revealed that most where white males, but by the time prospective applicant pool had been shaved down to 120, the ethnic make-up was more to the left’s liking and Democrats promptly dropped the matter.

Redistricting has long been one of Schwarzenegger’s big issues. In December 2008, shortly after Proposition 11 passed, creating a new citizens redistricting commission, Arnold stood among the trains at the California Railroad Museum here in Sacramento and gloated.

“When I stood in this great museum five years ago and called for redistricting reform, I knew how hard the job would be,” he said. “There have been several attempts over the past two decades to get redistricting reform that have all failed. But we never gave up, we kept fighting and we have achieved our goal of once again letting the people choose their elected officials.”

Of course, the next step is for our esteemed elected officials in the Legislature — the same people no longer trusted with drawing new districts — to go over the 60 semi-finalists. Lawmakers have until Nov. 15 to strike out eight from each of the three partisan groups (don’t you love how the state equates “Decline-to-State” with members of the Green, Libertarian and other minor parties?).

That will leave 36 applicants left. The state Auditor will then choose eight at random. Those eight will select a further six panelists, rounding out the panel at 14 (at the end, five will be Dems, five Reeps and the last four will be Decline-to-State/minor party-affiliated).

And then all our problems will be solved! Right?

SEPT. 27, 2010

  1. Phil says:

    This sounds like an improvment as all political groups are represented…at least it could not be any worse. However, I oppose capriciously eliminating qualified applicants because too many white people applied. Democracy is crazy. Why should this panel roughly match state demographics? Like most people in California I descend from hispanic immigrants, but this still makes no sense to me. Maybe there are more hispanic qualified candidates, and, therefore, there should be more on this panel, and maybe there are less. The same holds true for the White and black population. Telling a qualified white guy he can’t serve because there are too many white applicants = You can’t serve because your white, and that tantamounts to racisim. It’s also insulting because it assumes different races cannot possibly treat each other fairly. This is just stupid, like everything else in modern American society…completely stupid. I wonder what would happen if the military picked generals using this retarded method? Democracy’s shelf life has expired.

Know Your Bloggers

Joseph Perkins
Joseph Perkins, now assistant editor of the Orange County Register Opinion Pages, started his career as an editorial writer for the Wall Street Journal. After serving on the White House Staff of former Vice President Dan Quayle he wrote for the San Diego Union-Tribune where he authored a nationally-syndicated column. Before writing for, Mr. Perkins was also Business Editor for San Diego Magazine.
Chris Reed
Chris Reed is a regular contributor to Cal Watchdog. Reed is an editorial writer for U-T San Diego. Before joining the U-T in July 2005, he was the opinion-page columns editor and wrote the featured weekly Unspin column for The Orange County Register. Reed was on the national board of the Association of Opinion Page Editors from 2003-2005. From 2000 to 2005, Reed made more than 100 appearances as a featured news analyst on Los Angeles-area National Public Radio affiliate KPCC-FM. From 1990 to 1998, Reed was an editor, metro columnist and film critic at the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in Ontario. Reed has a political science degree from the University of Hawaii (Hilo campus), where he edited the student newspaper, the Vulcan News, his senior year. He is on Twitter: @chrisreed99.
Brian Calle
Brian Calle is Editor-in-Chief of and the Opinion Editor for the Orange County Register. His work has appeared in Bloomberg, Fox News, Forbes, Real Clear Politics, Human Events, Real Clear Markets and City Journal, among other websites and publications. Find him on Twitter: @briancalle
John Seiler
John Seiler has been writing about California for 25 years. That includes 22 years as an editorial writer for the Orange County Register and two years for, where he is managing editor. He attended the University of Michigan and graduated from Hillsdale College. He was a Russian linguist in U.S. Army military intelligence from 1978 to 1982. He was an editor and writer for Phillips Publishing Company from 1983 to 1986. He has written for Policy Review, Chronicles,, Flash Report and numerous other publications. His email:

Blog Archive

Archive By Categories
  • California economy
  • Corruption
  • Demographics
  • Education
  • Fracking
  • Health Care
  • Income inequality
  • Infrastructure
  • Inside Government
  • Law enforcement
  • Media
  • Obamacare
  • Obamacare implementation
  • Pension Reform
  • Politics and Elections
  • Regulations
  • Rights and Liberties
  • Seen at the Capitol
  • Taxes
  • Technology
  • Thought police
  • Waste, Fraud and Abuse