Will ‘maquila-solar’ zone form just outside CA state line?

July 10, 2013 - By admin

LADWP_Transmission_Grid_500July 10, 2013

By Wayne Lusvardi

Political borders create economic fault lines. For example, property rights might promote growth in one area, while lower wage rates might benefit another.

A good example is the “maquiladora” free-trade zone flourishing just across America’s border with Mexico the past 50 years. It boasts lower wage rates than in the United States to the North. And the Mexican government has reduced regulations and encouraged growth.

Now a “maquila-solar zone” may be growing just the other side of California’s borders in neighboring Utah, Oregon, Arizona and Nevada. The “maqulia-solar” phrase was coined by energy expert Chris Clarke on his National Wind Watch news site.

Clarke noted a recent non-precedent opinion by Judge Richard Posner of the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals that Michigan’s in-state renewable energy mandate is unconstitutional.

In the Michigan case, new transmission lines were planned to bring Western wind energy to the Great Lakes and Great Plains states.  Midwestern electric ratepayers were expected to pay for the new transmission lines.  But the state of Michigan sued on the basis that Michigan utilities are prohibited by state law from buying wind-generated electricity from out of state to meet its 10 percent green power mandate. If all green power had to come from inside the state, then Michigan electric ratepayers should not be asked to pay for transmission lines for green power they could not use.

The opinion means Michigan cannot erect a trade barrier against buying out-of-state green power. Posner’s opinion is  called “dicta,” or commentary, and does not set a binding precedent on California. But Judge Posner is a respected constitutional expert and other federal judges often defer to his decisions and opinions.

As Posner aptly noted, “Michigan cannot, without violating the commerce clause of Article I of the Constitution, discriminate against out-of-state renewable energy.” The commerce clause gives the federal government the sole authority to regulate trade among the 50 states. The Founding Fathers placed that in the Constitution to prevent trade wars between states, such as California putting up a tariff against cars made in Michigan; or Michigan putting up a tariff against software designed in California.

The commerce clause thus established a continent-wide free trade zone that has been crucial to America’s prosperity.

L.A.’s stealth monopoly power grid system

Unlike Michigan, California’s green laws do not prohibit purchase of out-of-state energy.  But several California policies favor developing and buying green power from within the state rather than from neighboring states, thus imposing a kind of soft protectionism. Such policies might come under attack after Posner’s decision.

First, California policy steers development of new solar projects within the state by influencing new transmission line routes.

Second, the California electric grid operator uses a complex “Smart Grid” system called “dynamic transfer” to monitor and steer how much green power is being used.  Smart metering apparently is a system to assure only “Made in California” green power gets to market, according to Clarke.

Third, Gov. Jerry Brown fast-tracked approvals of new solar farms in California’s deserts to compete with out-of-state power generated under fewer regulatory restrictions.

Fourth, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and the Southern California Power Authority buy out-of-state green power routed through its dedicated power lines.  The Southern California Power Authority supplies electricity to its member cities: Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Burbank, Cerritos, Colton, Glendale, Los Angeles, Pasadena, Riverside, Vernon and the Imperial Irrigation District.

However, LADWP’s interstate transmission lines use direct current instead of alternating current technology specifically so that the statewide grid cannot tap its power.  LADWP routes its power through a Converter Substation in Sylmar, Calif. to reconvert electrons back into alternating current to supply customers.  The SCPA also operates a closed system grid that is not open to the competitive market because of its direct current technology.

Proposition 39 targets out-of-state energy suppliers

Additionally, California voters passed Proposition 39 in 2012 to close alleged “loopholes” in state tax law to equalize California’s ability to compete with outside green power.  It raised taxes $1 billion a year.

Specifically, Prop. 39 requires out-of-state businesses of any type (not just energy companies) to calculate their income tax liability based on the percentage of sales in California. It repealed a previous law that allowed out-of-state companies to base tax payments on other factors beside in-state sales.

Prop. 39 mandates that about $550 million of the new taxes must fund energy efficiency projects in California. Prop. 39′s primary supporter was billionaire hedge fund manager Tom Steyer.  His Farallon Investments also manages energy funds for the California Public Employees’ Retirement System.

There has been a backlash against California’s restrictive policies by neighboring Western states.

With Posner’s new opinion, Clarke foresees a 961-mile long “maquila-solar” green-energy zone running along the Northern and Southeastern California. Electricity production would locate there to provide electrons to Californians, thus helping California meet green energy mandates, without suffering the hassles of California environmental laws.

For example, two years ago Brown signed into law a mandate that 33 percent of all energy used in California must come from “renewable” sources by 2020. If energy companies start ramping up “green” energy production in the “maquila-solar” areas outside California, Posner’s opinion indicates that there’s little California could do to stop them from taking over a large part of the Golden State green electron market.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments(7)
  1. Steele, Ted, When only the very best will do! says:

    We need more solar.

  2. Rex the Wonderdog! says:

    We need more teddy, for laughter……

  3. Maquila Solar Is the Wave of the Future says:

    Build the solar plants in Mexico and maybe developers won’t have to deal with California Unions for Reliable Energy hiring law firms to block the construction until unions are guaranteed all the work.

    But keep in mind how the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 569 in San Diego opposed Sempra’s application in 2011 for a permit from the Department of Energy (DOE) for the Energia Sierra Juarez Gen-Tie Project that would connect the ESJ Wind Farms in Baja California to the Southwest Power Link Transmission Line.

  4. Wayne Lusvardi says:

    There may be future lawsuits to open up the California market to solar from other states or Mexico. But that would mean forcing municipal power companies like LADWP to open up their direct current closed grid system. To do that solar companies would have to build costly transformer substations to convert electrical current to direct current. But then LADWP might say they don’t have capacity in their lines to handle competitive solar other than their own monopoly solar.

    This presents a dilemma for those who advocate free markets. If you want a free and open energy market the only way to do that in California is by allowing solar (or wind) power from other states to compete in California. But solar (and wind) even from states that have no environmental laws is much more expensive than conventional energy. So the message seems to be: you might be able to have an open energy market in Southern California but only for already over-priced solar power. Whooopee!!

  5. Wayne Lusvardi says:

    NO MAGUILA-SOLAR ZONE HERE -

    READ BELOW – APPARENTLY CALIFORNIA HAS SUCCESSFULLY BLOCKED OUT OF STATE SOLAR FOR NOW

    ENN Pulls Plug on Nevada Solar Project
    ENN Mojave Energy has canceled a 720-MW solar generation plant and thin-film manufacturing facility near Laughlin, Nev., because it couldn’t find buyers for the power.

  6. Knowledgeable about transmission says:

    The LADWP tranmission grid is not a closed system. It is interconnected to multiple utilities in the Western US. The LADWP is a partial owner and the operator of two very long direct current transmission lines. Because of the long distance, they are direct current lines. A similar length alternating current line would have excessive losses. Southern California Edison (SCE), an investor owned utility is the largest joint owner of the largest direct current line.

  7. Bill - San Jose says:

    One of the big stumbling blocks to solar (nevermind the insane cost compared to conventional power) is the desert turtle.

    The desert turtle people need to ask themselves how they can defy solar farms when the real tragedy occurred decades ago in regards to the desert turtle:

    Gov. Brown Aqueduct (named after the first criminal governor we had in this state, not his offspring).

    Get off the cross. We need the wood.

    We have perfect good power plants closing due to being ocean or delta cooled or because they are pet/coke fed steam powered plants. I dare anyone to compare the cost per KW and the environmental impact that doesn’t exist.

News Archive

Archive By Categories
  • Budget and Finance
  • Education
  • Health care
  • Infrastructure
  • Inside Government
  • Life in California
  • Politics and Elections
  • Regulations
  • Rights and Liberties
  • Waste, Fraud and Abuse