If CA a template for U.S. on income inequality, U.S. is doomed

October 2, 2013 - By Chris Reed

povertyCAExaltation of Gov. Jerry Brown — normally more an East Coast media thing than a California thing — has found a home in the Los Angeles Times. The paper carried a news analysis piece with this headline: “Gov. Brown sees his ambitious agenda as a template for nation.”

The analysis took Brown's view seriously. But should it have?

California has the highest effective poverty rate in the United States. The state auditor just put out a report that lists fundamental state problems that never get any better. The state government is pushing a project on track to be the biggest boondoggle in world history. And Jerry Brown thinks the rest of America should copy California!

But the single most hilarious part of the Times piece was Brown's suggestion that he had figured out how to counter income inequality:

“Since retaking office in 2011, Brown has raised concerns about growing income inequality across the country, calling it a risk for the United States' long-term political and economic stability. Months after persuading state voters to increase income taxes for those making more than $250,000 per year, Brown is now set to raise California's minimum wage to $10 per hour by 2016 — the highest in the nation.

“Democratic leaders hope the changes in California could help build momentum for national change.

“'This new law puts Californians ahead of the curve. Now, it's time for Congress to follow suit,' House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) said after Brown signed the wage increase.”

Tinkering on income margins hardly a national solution

Economists who read that will want to laugh or cry or both. Raising taxes on the rich and upping the minimum wage literally addresses problems on the margins — a relatively small reduction in the wealth of the rich and a big increase in minimum pay that still doesn't lift people into the middle class. It is no long-term response to income inequality, which is the product of big societal and economic shifts. I wrote about them here:

“When you set aside the class-warfare rhetoric that Democrats so enjoy, the drivers of income inequality are plain. The first is rarely acknowledged. It’s the increasing tendency of highly educated professionals to marry each other. Doctors used to marry nurses. Now they marry other doctors, concentrating family wealth.

“The second is that the modern economy places an ever-higher premium on job skills, and yet we don’t have a public education system that responds to this fact. In 2013, how is it possible that a year or more of computer science isn’t a universal high school graduation requirement?

“It’s not just information-technology jobs going unfilled because of a mismatch between what schools teach and what employers need. In many skilled-job categories — welders, critical-care nurses, electrical linemen, special-education teachers, geotechnical engineers, respiratory therapists — unemployment is practically zero.

“So long as we have an absurdly complex tax code in which the amount that the very wealthy pay depends on the skill of their tax attorneys, the Occupy argument that the U.S. is rigged to help the rich will resonate with some. But this doesn’t address the disconnect between what our schools teach and what our economy needs.”

Better education get to limiting income inequality

Brown JerryMy views are not fringe views. They're in the mainstream of how economists look at income inequality. This is from a Harvard professor's piece for the Huffington Post:

“High and rising income inequality in the United States has recently been widely commented upon. What has not been as widely discussed is the role educational attainment has played in these disparities. …

“In many ways, our two economies have created two separate societies. Those with low educational attainment drift permanently between recessions and depressions, with little stability. Those with high educational attainment experience increased wealth, only mild recessions, and interesting projects with personal growth.

“Additionally, these numbers suggest that our lack of highly-skilled knowledge workers is a major binding constraint on the growth of the American economy. In 2006 and 2007, unemployment rates for the highly-skilled group were as low as 2% — a figure viewed as basically beyond full employment. These results also imply that further economic growth in 2007 would have resulted in even higher wages (and more income inequality) for the more highly educated group.”

Jerry lucky to be covered by hagiographers

How strange that Jerry Brown, who wants us all to think that he's the smartest guy around, would offer the simplest and dumbest “template” for addressing income inequality — one that largely treats symptoms of income inequality as the causes of it. Unfortunately, it's not strange that the L.A. Times would let him get away with it.


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  1. Dyspeptic says:

    All modern societies have income inequality. Even in Cuba and North Korea the Communist Party elites have more material goods and higher incomes than the masses. Fixating on this issue is just another symptom of Socialist Derangement Syndrome. The Dumbocrats are just playing voters for the ignorant suckers they are. This is all about buying votes from the dirt dumb sheeple with economically destructive feel good policies.

    Raising the minimum wage does not reduce income inequality because whatever small gains are made by those at the margins are offset by higher unemployment and all of the anti-social pathologies that follow from that, like higher crime rates for inexperienced and unskilled laborers who are permanently priced out of the labor market.

    Here is a stone cold fact for all of you economic illiterates out there – ALL WAGES ULTIMATELY COME FROM PRODUCTIVITY, NOT BUREAUCRATIC FIAT. If minimum wage laws really reduced poverty then why not take that to it’s logical conclusion and eradicate poverty once and for all by raising the minimum wage to $100/hr.?
    What’s wrong with you compassion Nazi’s? Why the timid half measures?

    Prog-Bots of Crazyfornia, go big or go home.

  2. Rex the Wonderdog! says:

    Manufacturing GOODS, or even services, high tech services, creates wealth, increases disposable income, drives the economic growth and THAT lowers poverty.

    Hey, where is my buddy Teddy Steals????

  3. wrd9 says:

    Of course Brown and his fellow moonbats should be tackling these structural problems but, instead, they’ll just keep robbing the “rich” and redistributing even more money onto those who don’t value education, commit the vast amount of crime, and eschew personal responsibility. The resulting humongous entitlement mentality will be the ruin of America. Time for the productive to Go Galt.

  4. joe says:

    i lived in california for the past decade. at least ten percent of the LA population is illegal aliens taking good jobs and working for peanuts. there is a french airplane screw manufacturing company in torrance that hires mostly illegal aliens by the hundreds. i’ve personally been broke enough in LA that i’ve woken up in a twenty million dollar mansion with only ten dollars to my name. i’ve hear second hand of a rich hollywood hills family that brings in a lady from guatamala to be the nanny while paying her fifty dollars a month. and, my home was in the hollywood hills, around fancy houses, and I walked the hills for exercise for a decade, and I never saw a true american doing work…so, the rich get richer, the illegals are still poor, and the american can’t find a job.

Archive By Categories
  • California economy
  • Corruption
  • Demographics
  • Education
  • Fracking
  • Health Care
  • Income inequality
  • Infrastructure
  • Inside Government
  • Law enforcement
  • Media
  • Obamacare
  • Obamacare implementation
  • Pension Reform
  • Politics and Elections
  • Regulations
  • Rights and Liberties
  • Seen at the Capitol
  • Taxes
  • Technology
  • Thought police
  • Thoughtcrime
  • Waste, Fraud and Abuse