Tunnel could boost high-speed rail cost

Tunnel could boost high-speed rail cost

high-speed rail tunnelThe cost of the high-speed rail project might be going above the current estimate of $68 billion.

The California High-Speed Rail Authority recently announced a strategic shift to consider an alternative for its 40-mile Palmdale-to-Burbank link. Instead of the current plan of running it parallel to the Palmdale Freeway, the new line would run through a tunnel under the San Gabriel Mountains.

According to Los Angeles County Supervisor Mike Antonovich, who has advanced the idea, the tunnel would be about 15 miles long.

The CHSRA told CalWatchDog.com that it did not yet have estimates on the tunnels’ cost.

Curbed L.A. reported, “The tunnel would go under the San Gabriel Mountains and shorten the travel time along the stretch, though it’s not yet known by how much. Also not known yet: how much more it’s going to cost. The new route, plus one that runs from Burbank to Union Station will be discussed at an upcoming series of public scoping meetings over the first few weeks in August.”

Tunnel costs

But it’s possible to calculate a rough — very rough — estimate. Let’s start with something we know: the tunneling cost for the proposed extension of the Long Beach 710-Freeway: $6 billion for a 4.9-mile segment, which works out to $1.22 billion per mile.

As mentinoned, the San Gabriel Mountain tunnel link for high-speed rail would be 15 miles long. If it costs as much do dig that tunnel as the 710 freeway extension, that would be $1.22 billion per mile, or $18.3 billion total (15 miles X $1.22 billion per mile = $18.3 billion.)

Next, let’s return to the proposed high-speed rail land surface route, on which we have an official estimate. The proposal to run the 40-mile Palmdale-Burbank link on the land surface parallel to the Palmdale Freeway would cost $13.5 billion, or $337.5 million per mile, according to a June 30 report in the Los Angeles Times.

Now, let’s compare the two routes. The estimated $18.3 billion cost for the tunnel would be $4.8 billion, or 36 percent, more than the estimated cost of $13.5 billion for the land surface route.

That $4.8 billion extra cost also would increase the $68 billion cost of the entire system to $72.8 billion, a 7 percent increase.

Again, these are just rule-of-thumb estimates. We’ll have to wait until the CHSRA comes through with its won estimates of the cost of the potential tunnel to examine them more closely.

Hearings

According to the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, the following public meetings will allow citizens to ask about and discuss the proposed tunnel and other aspects of the project.

Meeting times are from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m:

  • Aug. 5, William S. Hart Regional Park, 24151 Newhall Ave., Newhall.
  • Aug. 6, Buena Vista Branch Library, 300 N. Buena Vista St., Burbank.
  • Aug. 7, Chimbole Cultural Center, 38350 Sierra Highway, Palmdale.
  • Aug. 11, Acton-Agua Dulce Library, 33792 Crown Valley Road, Acton.
  • Aug. 12, Sylmar Public Library, 14561 Polk St., Sylmar.
  • Aug. 14, Lake View Terrace Recreation Center, 11075 Foothill Blvd., Lake View Terrace.
  • Aug. 19, Los Angeles Union Station, Fred Harvey Room, 800 N. Alameda St. Los Angeles.

3 comments

Write a comment
  1. Ulusses Uhaul
    Ulusses Uhaul 10 August, 2014, 09:21

    Your head could explode!

    No mas-

    Reply this comment
  2. Violet
    Violet 11 August, 2014, 15:19

    The surface route also includes substantial tunnel parts. You haven’t included that in your calculation.
    The tunnel technique is available, there are train tunnels through the alps and there is an over 30 miles tunnel beneath the English channel between France and England. I don’t believe that more tunnels are the problem of the High Speed Train project and I mean that in terms of costs.
    The surface route claims to be parallel to the Freeway 14, but it is not. It cuts through unspoiled wilderness and would destroy whole towns. The way it is planned, a town like Acton would be sliced in several parts, including schools. I think the tunnel option is the better option.

    Reply this comment
  3. Speedy Gonzalez
    Speedy Gonzalez 13 August, 2014, 18:31

    When did these idiots lose theur mind?

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*


Tags assigned to this article:
CHSRAhigh-speed railtunnelWayne Lusvardi

Related Articles

Obama drought relief package aids his constituency

On Friday Feb. 14,  President Barack Obama choppered into California’s drought zone in Democratic-leaning Fresno. As shown in the adjacent photo

How much taxpayers lose in special elections

Henry T. Perea’s decision to vacate his Assembly seat early cost Fresno County a half-million dollars — enough to pay

Questionable practices at CA prisons criticized

After years spent under the glare of judicial scrutiny, California’s effort to clean up its prison system has run up against a