Kashkari draws a media crowd

Kashkari draws a media crowd

Neel Kashkari Down and OutNeel Kashkari, Gov. Jerry Brown’s Republican challenger, has been playing a long game.

That hasn’t been immediately evident from the frenetic activity surrounding his final month of campaigning. Using a string of concept-driven political stunts, ranging from free prizes to a masquerade as a homeless man, Kashkari has established a reputation for putting elbow grease into his run for governor.

Yet into the active effort and strident rhetoric Kashkari has added a relatively tongue-in-cheek approach to the uphill run before him. Unusual for a Republican trying to make a name in other states — but not so out of place in California — the combination of smarts, sarcasm and street hustle has inspired the media, if not Democrats, to take a closer look.

A new brand

Interest has swirled around whether Kashkari plausibly can portray a character that many have referenced but few have embodied — a “different kind of Republican,” as The Economist put it. Over the summer, some conservative stalwarts began to notice Kashkari’s recipe for change involved scrambling old battle lines, not simply moving to the progressive left or the pro-corporate center.

In a column hailing Kashkari, George Will depicted him as the heir to Barry Goldwater, who in 1964 famously lost in a landslide to President Lyndon Johnson — yet inspired a conservative movement that elected Ronald Reagan president in 1980. “If California becomes a purple state and Democrats can no longer assume its 20 percent of 270 electoral votes, Republicans nationwide will be indebted to the immigrants’ son who plucked up Goldwater’s banner of conservatism with a Western libertarian flavor.”

Goldwater turned his electoral blowout into an opportunity to shift the national Republican Party. Kashkari’s underdog status has afforded a similar opportunity — and the political press has picked up on the strategy. Rather than offering the media a retread of tales of California Republicans’ past, Kashkari has presented a surprising spectacle. Wealthy political novices from business backgrounds, such as Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman, have tried to unseat top-tier Democrats before. They failed — leading national political journalists to question why the state GOP was willing to tolerate such a bad investment.

Kashkari, who is not personally short on cash, has raised a far more modest campaign chest. But his small budget has become a buzz-building advantage. Not only has it fueled the kind of stunt-driven campaigning that grabs headlines, it has given state Republicans a feeling that neither donors nor the party have thrown good money after bad. And it has changed the media narrative, differentiating Kashkari from the political losers who have come before him.

The shift hasn’t necessarily played well with Kashkari’s natural allies across the country — Republicans close to Wall Street. After hitting the stump for him in early summer, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie couldn’t find time to share the state with Kashkari in the election season’s final weeks. Rather than a personal slight, however, the decision was strictly business: Christie was dispatched by the Republican Governors Association to help put well-positioned candidates over the top.

West coast credentials

The absence of monied East Coast support isn’t really a disadvantage for Kashkari. Earlier in his primary campaign, he had to shake his political association with the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP — the massive 2008 bailout program he was instrumental in designing and implementing under President George W. Bush. Kashkari seems to have determined that the West Coast — not Wall Street or his home state of Ohio — is the most hospitable territory for his brand of Republicanism.

Indeed, the swell of attention surrounding his approach has led some observers to suggest Kashkari could emerge from even a losing campaign as a powerful force in California Republican politics. Asked by the Santa Monica Mirror if he would consider a race for Senate in the years to come, Kashkari was blunt. “In all honesty, I’ve never ruled out any of those opportunities,” he said. Although, he added, he was “100 percent focused on November,” Mirror columnist Tom Elias placed his bet “on Kashkari starting right in on his next effort.”

And whereas he’s running against an incumbent this year, the next California U.S. Senate race is for the seat of Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer in 2016. Last month the Chronicle reported:

“Sen. Barbara Boxer says she has yet to make up her mind about seeking a fifth term in 2016, but there’s no shortage of signs that the Democrat may be opting out.

“It’s not just that she has less than $200,000 in her campaign account, compared with $3.5 million at this stage before her last election fight. Some comments from those who know the 73-year-old senator are also telling.

“‘She is not running for re-election,’ said one longtime Democratic fundraiser with deep ties to Boxer, who spoke only on background.”

Of course, she still might run. But if she retires, the open field, combined with Kashkari’s experience with this year’s campaign, could give him a big leg up in 2016.

4 comments

Write a comment
  1. Bill - San Jose
    Bill - San Jose 9 October, 2014, 12:17

    Can’t knock him for his effort to get the so-called media to place his name anywhere near a headline.

    CA will have fun swimming in the overspending soon enough and at that time, Brown will bow out “gracefully”.

    Kash will get my vote based on knowing that Sacto is easily the most corrupt among all states including Mississippi.

    Reply this comment
  2. Bill Gore
    Bill Gore 9 October, 2014, 15:32

    No East Coast support? “Cash’ is a PRINCETON graduate (which dinner club?), GOLDMAN SACHS alumnus (maybe John Corzine and Hank Paulson could feature in prime time ads). This dude is 100% wall street carpetbager…

    Admittedly, he is young and smart, so his impossible campaign is going to be edgy. Too bad this is the best california republicans can muster, no more Reagans, Wilsons or Browns (senior) on the horizon.

    Reply this comment
  3. LetitCollapse
    LetitCollapse 9 October, 2014, 16:10

    Cashkari thinks he can come out west to hide from his TARP association? lol. Not from this boy. He must think we don’t read the news on this side of the Mississippi. I have a long memory. I’ll never forgive him for snuggling up to Hanky-Panky Paulson and royally screwing the common Main Street taxpayer. And he’d do it again given the opportunity. It’s a shame that the Republicans can’t find one contender with integrity to challenge Brownie. But I guess that’s why it’s a dying political party. I won’t be voting for Brownie or Cashkari. I’ll do a write-in or give my vote to a longshot. The whole electoral system is a joke anyway. The vote feeds you with an illusion that you are in control. It makes you feel good about paying your taxes. heh. Keep writing your congressman. I’m sure he cares what you think. 🙂

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*



Related Articles

Demise of two conservative journals helps explain GOP problems

Feb. 28, 2013 By John Seiler Two venerable old conservative print journals have died in recent days. Policy Review has

Shape-shifting pol: It’s dirty pool to mention my shape-shifting

The saga of Nathan Fletcher — the 90 percent conventional Republican assemblyman who became a righteous, holier-than-thou independent before ending

Assembly Candidates Need Gravitas

Two of the Sacramento politicians who are running for the same state Assembly seat, can’t see fit to even cast