Will Little Hoover compel green-energy testimony?

Will Little Hoover compel green-energy testimony?

Little Hoover Rewiring California 2Here’s the 13,000-megawatt question to be answered in 2015:

Will the Little Hoover Commission begin issuing subpoenas in 2015 to compel Gov. Jerry Brown and California legislative leaders to meet green energy accountability requirements spelled out in its 2012 report, “Rewiring California: Integrating Agendas for Energy Reform”?

The commission is the state’s independent state oversight agency. And 13,000 megawatts is the estimated amount of new green energy, according to “Rewiring California,” p. vii, coming on line in the course of the next decade in California under AB32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 and other state laws.

On Oct. 24, Little Hoover sent a letter to Brown to hold the governor accountable on answering the much-avoided question about mandated green energy: How much is it going to cost, beginning in 2015?

Thus far, Brown has ignored the letter.

Bills

Neither has the Legislature passed the two electricity reform bills recommended by the Commission:

Assembly Bill 1763 is by Assemblyman Henry Perea, D-Fresno. It requires the California Energy Commission to consult with other state and local agencies to develop “a report containing a state energy plan for 2030 and 2050 that promotes economic growth, ensures reliable, sustainable and affordable energy resources, and complements the state’s environmental stewardship goals.” The report then would be submitted to the governor and the Legislature.

No action was taken on AB1763 this year, and a hearing on it was canceled.

Assembly Bill 1779 is by Assemblyman Ted Gaines, R-Roseville. Taking into account the implementation of AB32 and other state laws, it requires the CEC to “prepare a new, annual report to assess the effect in the aggregate of specified policies on electricity reliability and rates and whether these policies are achieving their stated environmental and economic goals.”

Back in April, AB1779 failed to pass the Assembly Natural Resources Committee. After that, nothing happened.

It’s not clear whether the bills, or similar ones, will be reintroduced into the new legislative session that began on Dec. 1.

Subpoena Power 

If there is no further action, can Little Hoover really issue subpoenas to get answers? Yes.

California Government Code Section 8541-8542 authorizes the Little Hoover Commission:

  • “To issue subpoenas to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of books, records, papers, accounts, reports and documents…
  • “To direct the sheriff of any county or any marshal to serve subpoenas, orders and other process…
  • “To certify to the superior court of any county in which proceedings are held, the facts concerning the disobedience or resistance, by any person, of any lawful order, or the refusal of any person to respond to a subpoena … and to receive the assistance of the court in enforcing orders and process.”

The governor appoints five of the nine members of the Little Hoover Commission. So it is highly unlikely it would subpoena him on this or any other matter.

And two members are appointed by the Assembly speaker, with the final two appointed by the chairman of the state Senate Committee on Rules. So it’s also unlikely legislators would be subpoenaed.

Little Hoover potentially could compel testimony from lower-level state policymakers, such as California Air Resources Board Chair Mary Nichols. But given her high profile and close relationship with Brown, that also seems unlikely.

Ultimately, it’s the voters who must hold the governor and legislators accountable. Which they may do if green-power costs spike energy rates.


Tags assigned to this article:
Little Hoover CommissionWayne Lusvardi

Related Articles

Stalking Law Hurts Small Claims Courts

MARCH 22, 2011 By STAN BRIN California’s Small Claims Courts are in trouble. Every year, fewer people take their cases

Consumer Watchdog criticized for ‘misleading’ report

The shoe’s on the other foot for Consumer Watchdog (no connection to CalWatchdog.com). Routinely critical of state regulators for failing to

New appeal seeks to halt bullet train

A new legal move has ratcheted up the legal battle around California’s $68 billion high-speed rail project. In a controversial decision late this July,