LAUSD may kill reform to avoid graduation-rate plunge

lausdEven amid scandals over its iPads-for-all program and battles over leadership, the Los Angeles Unified School District has been able to cite some good news on the academic front in recent times. In April, district officials trumpeted the release of state data showing that the graduation rate for the high school class which graduated in June 2014 was 70.4 percent, up from 68.1 percent for the class that graduated in June 2013. It was the fourth straight year the percentage had increased.

But now a huge threat has emerged to this picture of academic progress — one that could drop the graduation rate to 25 percent in the nation’s second-largest school district. It’s a 2005 policy adopted by L.A. Unified’s board that required that beginning in 2017, degrees would only go to students who had a C average or better in 15 college-prep classes. The “A to G” program, as it’s known, is emerging as a huge hurdle for most students. In May, Los Angeles Unified board members heard a staff presentation in which officials estimated that three-quarters of current 10th graders would not be able to meet this standard.

As a result, the LAUSD board is meeting Tuesday to discuss how to weaken the rules. Two changes appear likely:

  • Allowing a D to be considered a satisfactory grade for graduation in the 15 college-prep classes.
  • Allowing students to keep taking classes in LAUSD so they can keep trying to meet graduation retirements until their 22nd birthday.

Change would seemingly eliminate point of 2005 reform

The first change is much more significant than a similar proposal that board member Monica Ratliff suggested last month: Allowing LAUSD students to graduate if they averaged a C grade in the college prep classes. It would effectively overturn the key goal of the 2005 reform: making a high school degree a far more significant academic achievement. Instead, a student would continue to be able to graduate by avoiding an F in any mandatory class.

Yet at least one school board member says these changes don’t really amount to reversing course. Here’s what Steve Zimmer told KPCC:

Zimmer said the recession and district budget cuts created large class sizes and a lack of tutoring and other services to support students toward graduation. The proposals would ensure that enough resources are provided to help students succeed, Zimmer said. … Students in the class of 2016 and 2017 would not be required to meet the C requirement, if the changes are approved.

 

Zimmer doesn’t see the changes as rolling back academic standards.

‘Reform fatigue’ vs. ‘reform abandonment’

Educators have often talked about “reform fatigue,” as school districts frequently tinker with or make major changes in their policies to try to improve academent achievements. “With each reform, teachers and administrators have lost a little more trust in the city, state, and federal officials setting the agenda — not to mention a lot of their time,” noted a March piece on education reform in Slate. What L.A. Unified’s board looks poised to do is more like “reform abandonment.”

Board member Ratliff, however, said last month that she simply didn’t believe the A to G program was fair.

“Of course, I don’t want our graduation rates to plummet but this isn’t about that,” Ratliff said on KPCC’s Air Talk program.

The board meeting starts at 1 p.m. Audio and video streaming are available here. The proposed changes in the A to G program are the 39th item on the agenda and will be discussed after several public hearings on reauthorizing certain charter schools, so it’s unlikely to be taken up until well into the meeting.

2 comments

Write a comment
  1. Ronald Stein
    Ronald Stein 9 June, 2015, 10:29

    The unintended consequences associated with increase in the minimum wage may have adverse effects on graduation rates. There was a time when the minimum wage was an incentive to get an education to get into job that would pay a wage to support a family. Now, the crusade toward huge increases in the minimum wage to the point that everyone will be getting similar compensation as those on Social Security. The crusade toward entitlement lives on while the incentive to get educated loses.

    Numbers don’t lie but liars can figure. Yes, our employment numbers have improved, but those reporting those great numbers don’t bother highlighting that most are in the food service and hospitality sectors. The public focus is diverted to those not making enough on minimum wages, i.e., those in the food service and hospitality sectors, and the crusade is to RAISE the minimum wage! Rather than heal the wounds resulting from constant attacks on businesses that are driving out many high wage positions and driving up the costs for those that remain in California, the easy way out is to apply a “band aid” on the wound rather than heal the wound.

    But wait, the unintended consequence associated with the upcoming minimum wage increases will be a great way to incentivize kids to drop out of school. Imagine the carrot of a huge minimum wage of a $25 to 30,000 a year minimum wage as a reward for no higher education. These kids will also be netting more than those on fixed income Social Security. It may be better to stop beating up on businesses with over regulations, over taxation, and uncontrollable “fees” that are slight inconveniences to those making the big bucks, but the California financially challenged will continue to disproportionally pick up the costs “camouflaged” at businesses.

    Reply this comment
  2. Queeg
    Queeg 9 June, 2015, 23:47

    Now how does this work? No standards….just leave proudly for your career globalist service job!

    But…..college grads need these service jobs too!

    Pity-

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*



Chris Reed

Chris Reed

Chris Reed is a regular contributor to Cal Watchdog. Reed is an editorial writer for U-T San Diego. Before joining the U-T in July 2005, he was the opinion-page columns editor and wrote the featured weekly Unspin column for The Orange County Register. Reed was on the national board of the Association of Opinion Page Editors from 2003-2005. From 2000 to 2005, Reed made more than 100 appearances as a featured news analyst on Los Angeles-area National Public Radio affiliate KPCC-FM. From 1990 to 1998, Reed was an editor, metro columnist and film critic at the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in Ontario. Reed has a political science degree from the University of Hawaii (Hilo campus), where he edited the student newspaper, the Vulcan News, his senior year. He is on Twitter: @chrisreed99.

Related Articles

Happy Easter!

John Seiler: We at CalWatchDog.com wish all of you a Happy Easter. Celebration with Easter Egg hunts and bunny rabbits

Stuzman on Whitman's Loss

John Seiler: I’ve known Rob Stutzman about 15 years, since he was press secretary to Attorney General Dan Lungren back

Govt. Stockholm Syndrome Strikes

John Seiler: You’ve probably heard of Stockholm Syndrome, where hostage victims end up identifying with the hostage takers. Here’s Wikipedia’s