<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Dismal state	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2010/01/09/new-dismal-state/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/01/09/new-dismal-state/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Gordon		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/01/09/new-dismal-state/#comment-58</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Gordon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=812#comment-58</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One of the biggest problems with the Schwarzenegger administration has been an incredible lack of foresight.  He no sooner makes a budget, then some new projection comes out and he has to do it all over again.  That and simple administrative competence.  Have you ever tried to call the Governor&#039;s office? - if you are not a big corporation, forget it.

Instead of that typical right wing talking point of &quot;smaller government&quot;, however, wouldn&#039;t it be better to build a government that is the &quot;right size&quot; and actually works?  Poster &quot;tough love&quot; above was onto something by pointing out that &quot;reductions&quot; in pensions for new employees won&#039;t materialize for many years.  Why not get rid of their pensions entirely? - none of the rest of us get them.  In fact, why not get rid of public employees entirely - put them all under contract.  These contracts could still offer a benefits package, and even be generous, but they should last a few years at most, and should never guarantee the lifetime employment that no one else in our society gets.

Rob Gordon
www.CalTrade.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest problems with the Schwarzenegger administration has been an incredible lack of foresight.  He no sooner makes a budget, then some new projection comes out and he has to do it all over again.  That and simple administrative competence.  Have you ever tried to call the Governor&#8217;s office? &#8211; if you are not a big corporation, forget it.</p>
<p>Instead of that typical right wing talking point of &#8220;smaller government&#8221;, however, wouldn&#8217;t it be better to build a government that is the &#8220;right size&#8221; and actually works?  Poster &#8220;tough love&#8221; above was onto something by pointing out that &#8220;reductions&#8221; in pensions for new employees won&#8217;t materialize for many years.  Why not get rid of their pensions entirely? &#8211; none of the rest of us get them.  In fact, why not get rid of public employees entirely &#8211; put them all under contract.  These contracts could still offer a benefits package, and even be generous, but they should last a few years at most, and should never guarantee the lifetime employment that no one else in our society gets.</p>
<p>Rob Gordon<br />
<a href="http://www.CalTrade.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.CalTrade.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tough Love		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/01/09/new-dismal-state/#comment-57</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tough Love]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=812#comment-57</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Quoting ...&quot;It’s time to roll up our sleeves and start the long tiring process of reform all over again.&quot;

And to START with Pension &#038; benefit reductions for both NEW employees and for FUTURE years of service for CURRENT (yes CURRENT) employees.

We&#039;re broke NOW and savings from only NEW employees will not materialize for 20-30 years until they retire .... long after California has been dead and buried !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting &#8230;&#8221;It’s time to roll up our sleeves and start the long tiring process of reform all over again.&#8221;</p>
<p>And to START with Pension &amp; benefit reductions for both NEW employees and for FUTURE years of service for CURRENT (yes CURRENT) employees.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re broke NOW and savings from only NEW employees will not materialize for 20-30 years until they retire &#8230;. long after California has been dead and buried !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-15 02:09:27 by W3 Total Cache
-->