Comments on: CCPOA pays pittance https://calwatchdog.com/2010/02/15/ccpoa-pays-pittance/ Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:27:46 +0000 hourly 1 By: stevefromsacto https://calwatchdog.com/2010/02/15/ccpoa-pays-pittance/#comment-265 Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:55:26 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=2034#comment-265 Welcome to Larry’s World, where workers have no rights. How is it a conflict of interest for government employees who belong to a union to fight for improved wages and benefits?

]]> By: goldenstate https://calwatchdog.com/2010/02/15/ccpoa-pays-pittance/#comment-264 Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:25:20 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=2034#comment-264 Four million duckets is alot of money for UPL; however it appears by CCPOA not paying the UPL monies when they should have encourages the diversion from the furloughs. Two wrongs don’t make a right! Both are wrong, what union buisness have the leadership been conducting, no contract, a major factor of having a union. The furloughs are illegal against our constitution, in violation of slavery. A furlough is a day OFF with no pay, not a day at work with no pay. The UPL use appears to be abused by the officials. IS spending a weekend in Vegas UPL buisness? Have the furloughs helped the economy? NO!! BIG NO! LAO proved that by their study. Both don’t know what the hell they’re doing!!!

]]> By: EastBayLarry https://calwatchdog.com/2010/02/15/ccpoa-pays-pittance/#comment-263 Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:33:02 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=2034#comment-263 The state needs to fire these union leaders. It’s a conflict of interest for them to be governemnt employees pressuring the governemnt to concede to union demands.

]]> By: X-Emeritus https://calwatchdog.com/2010/02/15/ccpoa-pays-pittance/#comment-262 Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:20:07 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=2034#comment-262 The “State” hasn’t the “Intestinal Fortitude” to pursue the CCPOA UPL Debt.

When will this Administration “Grow Some”!?

A pittance is a pittance! It’s 4-Million or go back to work!

]]>