<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: State touts &#039;green&#039; progress	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2010/03/29/new-state-touts-green-progress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/03/29/new-state-touts-green-progress/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:57:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: EastBayLarry		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/03/29/new-state-touts-green-progress/#comment-621</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EastBayLarry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=3331#comment-621</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I say the key phrase here is &quot;...take all practical and cost-effective measures...&quot;.
It cannot be considered &#039;practical&#039; to increase costs for state agencies at this time. As Katy says, if we get our finances in order, this would be a good thing, but currently it is unforgivable to increase costs to implement green tech.
On the &#039;cost-effective&#039; front, many of the green proposals will end up costing more money over the live of the systems, i.e. a solar panel system to reduce electricity usage will end up costing more than the cost of the electricity saved.
On the national front, I believe this is the reason Obama has said that the cost of gasoline &quot;needs to be about $7.00 per gallon&quot;. At that price point, green tech DOES compete economically.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say the key phrase here is &#8220;&#8230;take all practical and cost-effective measures&#8230;&#8221;.<br />
It cannot be considered &#8216;practical&#8217; to increase costs for state agencies at this time. As Katy says, if we get our finances in order, this would be a good thing, but currently it is unforgivable to increase costs to implement green tech.<br />
On the &#8216;cost-effective&#8217; front, many of the green proposals will end up costing more money over the live of the systems, i.e. a solar panel system to reduce electricity usage will end up costing more than the cost of the electricity saved.<br />
On the national front, I believe this is the reason Obama has said that the cost of gasoline &#8220;needs to be about $7.00 per gallon&#8221;. At that price point, green tech DOES compete economically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-15 09:32:02 by W3 Total Cache
-->