<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Todd Spitzer scares people	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/02/todd-spitzer-scares-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/02/todd-spitzer-scares-people/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:56:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Holden Balzac		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/02/todd-spitzer-scares-people/#comment-2206</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holden Balzac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=8440#comment-2206</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Spitzer scares you and T-Rack doesn&#039;t?  Or -- gasp -- Schroeder?!?  Please name a more disfunctional, ass-covering governmental entity in Orange County than the D.A.&#039;s office?  There&#039;s no question but that Todd Spitzer is a media hound and is as ambitious as the day is long.  I&#039;m not even going to argue one way or another about his qualifications or lack thereof to be D.A.  But your post leaves a lot to be desired in the way of research and balance.  First of all, Spitzer is undoubtedly not waiving confidentiality as a tactical ploy, but read the appellate court opinion on what T-Rack did to Mike Jacobs.  T-Rack &#038; Co. are fully versed in the arts of dirty tricks.  Hell, if I were in Spitzer&#039;s spot, I&#039;d use anything I could to my advantage, because you damn well know that T-Rack is going to come at him with guns blazing.  Second, before jumping on Spitzer for playing the martyr, maybe you should ask the question why a relatively minor complaint about Spitzer asking questions about an obscure guardianship case suddenly became a fireable offense?  God knows, there are Deputy D.A.s who have done far worse, far more frequently and not only survived, but thrived.  So, what&#039;s the motivation?  Get Spitzer out of the D.A.s office just so T-Rack can run again?  Or is T-Rack going to try to pull the old switcheroo on the eve of the election to put his toady Schroeder in as &quot;interim&quot; D.A. so she can run as the incumbent?  But, hey, don&#039;t let me get in your way as you run with T-Rack&#039;s prefered spin.  God forbid you actually start using your brain rather than just your tape recorder.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spitzer scares you and T-Rack doesn&#8217;t?  Or &#8212; gasp &#8212; Schroeder?!?  Please name a more disfunctional, ass-covering governmental entity in Orange County than the D.A.&#8217;s office?  There&#8217;s no question but that Todd Spitzer is a media hound and is as ambitious as the day is long.  I&#8217;m not even going to argue one way or another about his qualifications or lack thereof to be D.A.  But your post leaves a lot to be desired in the way of research and balance.  First of all, Spitzer is undoubtedly not waiving confidentiality as a tactical ploy, but read the appellate court opinion on what T-Rack did to Mike Jacobs.  T-Rack &amp; Co. are fully versed in the arts of dirty tricks.  Hell, if I were in Spitzer&#8217;s spot, I&#8217;d use anything I could to my advantage, because you damn well know that T-Rack is going to come at him with guns blazing.  Second, before jumping on Spitzer for playing the martyr, maybe you should ask the question why a relatively minor complaint about Spitzer asking questions about an obscure guardianship case suddenly became a fireable offense?  God knows, there are Deputy D.A.s who have done far worse, far more frequently and not only survived, but thrived.  So, what&#8217;s the motivation?  Get Spitzer out of the D.A.s office just so T-Rack can run again?  Or is T-Rack going to try to pull the old switcheroo on the eve of the election to put his toady Schroeder in as &#8220;interim&#8221; D.A. so she can run as the incumbent?  But, hey, don&#8217;t let me get in your way as you run with T-Rack&#8217;s prefered spin.  God forbid you actually start using your brain rather than just your tape recorder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Seiler		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/02/todd-spitzer-scares-people/#comment-2205</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Seiler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=8440#comment-2205</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Steve reported years ago on Spitzer&#039;s selling out, while on the O.C. Board of Supervisors, on the pension spiking law. If O.C. goes bankrupt -- again -- blame Spitzer first.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve reported years ago on Spitzer&#8217;s selling out, while on the O.C. Board of Supervisors, on the pension spiking law. If O.C. goes bankrupt &#8212; again &#8212; blame Spitzer first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Frank		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/02/todd-spitzer-scares-people/#comment-2204</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=8440#comment-2204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The first time he was in the DA&#039;s office, before he was an elected official, did he take some leaves of absence?  If so, why?  Maybe the answer is here?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first time he was in the DA&#8217;s office, before he was an elected official, did he take some leaves of absence?  If so, why?  Maybe the answer is here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-20 11:42:09 by W3 Total Cache
-->