<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Pensions Crushing San Jose; City Voters Eye Reform	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/23/pensions-crushing-san-jose-city-voters-eye-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/23/pensions-crushing-san-jose-city-voters-eye-reform/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 21:32:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: impeach Mayor Reed		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/23/pensions-crushing-san-jose-city-voters-eye-reform/#comment-2444</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[impeach Mayor Reed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 21:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9087#comment-2444</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[First of all. Has anyone noticed that the city can&#039;t go into bankruptcy. The city has a golden coffers (A Stadium Fund), your mayor has a golden parachute too or might I say the AAA bond rating from the Employees Pensions funds. The other thing is that most police and fire don&#039;t retire until least 28 years of service or 60 years of age (NOT 50). When a fireman or officer die before 77 the city makes money from the employee contributions. The city pockets the retirement account and does not give it to the spouse? Who win there, CITY. I noticed, in my parents family and friends most of them are dyeing around 65. Winner again CITY...

Mayor REED is a wild animal. He seems to be attacking public employees for his political agenda. Look at what he did to San Diego. During some of the greatest stock Market gains the U.S has ever seen. He put San Diego into Bancruptcy their too?  Hmmm, Maybe the problem is Mayor Reed??? And not the hard working employees of San Jose or Santa Clara.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all. Has anyone noticed that the city can&#8217;t go into bankruptcy. The city has a golden coffers (A Stadium Fund), your mayor has a golden parachute too or might I say the AAA bond rating from the Employees Pensions funds. The other thing is that most police and fire don&#8217;t retire until least 28 years of service or 60 years of age (NOT 50). When a fireman or officer die before 77 the city makes money from the employee contributions. The city pockets the retirement account and does not give it to the spouse? Who win there, CITY. I noticed, in my parents family and friends most of them are dyeing around 65. Winner again CITY&#8230;</p>
<p>Mayor REED is a wild animal. He seems to be attacking public employees for his political agenda. Look at what he did to San Diego. During some of the greatest stock Market gains the U.S has ever seen. He put San Diego into Bancruptcy their too?  Hmmm, Maybe the problem is Mayor Reed??? And not the hard working employees of San Jose or Santa Clara.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jim		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/23/pensions-crushing-san-jose-city-voters-eye-reform/#comment-2443</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9087#comment-2443</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And why is it city council voted a 20% pay rase and now will not cut there pay 10% as they have asked all other employees to take.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And why is it city council voted a 20% pay rase and now will not cut there pay 10% as they have asked all other employees to take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mamalita		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/23/pensions-crushing-san-jose-city-voters-eye-reform/#comment-2442</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mamalita]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9087#comment-2442</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is good that the Mayor wants to fix something broken. It is horrible that employees and retirees are blamed for the damage, along with a few politicos who may have begged to differ in opinion.

I wonder how much it cost the City for Ron Gonzalez&#039;s golden parachute? or Del Borgsdorff&#039;s? Both of which were more than likely approved by mayor Reed himself.

Now that the poop is hitting the fan and the sky is falling, Ceasar and his cohorts are running for cover. The plebs and serfs have to do the heavy lifting and the Emperor need not care if any of them get crushed by your failed decisions.

You have been with the City Council since 2000, Mr. Reed. Where was this sentiment when the Budget Office was presenting dwindling general fund resources almost a decade ago?

If I&#039;m not mistaken, every non-appointed city employee had to pass rigorous Civil Service exams for gainful employment plus more exams for every promotion. Each retiree represents about 25+ years of his adult working life dedicated to serving the residents of the City of San Jose. Many of these people could have earned much more in the private sector during the dot com boom years.

San Jose is not alone in its plight. The USA has an unfunded liability of non-pension benefits in the amount of $173 billion according to the Pew Trust Study and $48 billion of that rests on the shoulders of taxpayers in the State of California.

To suggest that this can be corrected by decreasing the workforce or decreasing workforce benefits is morally irresponsible, not just to City employees but more so for its residents. Yet how can you suggest that taking away food, shelter, health care and education from families of your city employees and retirees be the sole panacea to the unfunded pension problem?

These are hard and harsh times for EVERYONE including the residents of the City of San Jose. For so many years, I have seen the City staff forces dwindle even as we built our new beautiful City Hall and left the old one empty. And still, city staffing and general fund decrease.  The new City was supposed to save money.  You played your shell game and now programs that were housed in a paid for building pay rent for your sterile monument.  The need to increase fees gets blamed on employees benefits, not your decisions.
It seems to me you need to also consider increasing general fund revenues. You provoke the ire of government officials by chiding them for being weak when it comes to fiscal responsibility. How strong are you?  Will you stand up to the taxpayers that you invoke? Will you ask for their help to increase the general fund and help stop the deficit?  Will you ask them to pay a fair share of the cost for the services they want?  The reserves have been used, capital funds transferred, workforces decreased to bare bones, paychecks frozen or cut, proposed 2-tier retirement packages alienating potential recruits and short of declaring bankruptcy and shutting down city hall, what else can you propose?
It has already started, but it could go farther: consolidate departments and decrease their numbers to align with the same number of CSA&#039;s. Fewer departments and department/assistant department heads. Aim for an organization that is streamlined and breezy light on top and reaches out to all resident sectors on the lowest hierarchy.
What else can you propose? How about proposing fewer council members?  Let&#039;s go back to the general fund and the voters. Can you do it, Mr. Reed? If we residents want and need more services, then the simple painful truth is we the residents just need to PAY for those much needed services.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is good that the Mayor wants to fix something broken. It is horrible that employees and retirees are blamed for the damage, along with a few politicos who may have begged to differ in opinion.</p>
<p>I wonder how much it cost the City for Ron Gonzalez&#8217;s golden parachute? or Del Borgsdorff&#8217;s? Both of which were more than likely approved by mayor Reed himself.</p>
<p>Now that the poop is hitting the fan and the sky is falling, Ceasar and his cohorts are running for cover. The plebs and serfs have to do the heavy lifting and the Emperor need not care if any of them get crushed by your failed decisions.</p>
<p>You have been with the City Council since 2000, Mr. Reed. Where was this sentiment when the Budget Office was presenting dwindling general fund resources almost a decade ago?</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken, every non-appointed city employee had to pass rigorous Civil Service exams for gainful employment plus more exams for every promotion. Each retiree represents about 25+ years of his adult working life dedicated to serving the residents of the City of San Jose. Many of these people could have earned much more in the private sector during the dot com boom years.</p>
<p>San Jose is not alone in its plight. The USA has an unfunded liability of non-pension benefits in the amount of $173 billion according to the Pew Trust Study and $48 billion of that rests on the shoulders of taxpayers in the State of California.</p>
<p>To suggest that this can be corrected by decreasing the workforce or decreasing workforce benefits is morally irresponsible, not just to City employees but more so for its residents. Yet how can you suggest that taking away food, shelter, health care and education from families of your city employees and retirees be the sole panacea to the unfunded pension problem?</p>
<p>These are hard and harsh times for EVERYONE including the residents of the City of San Jose. For so many years, I have seen the City staff forces dwindle even as we built our new beautiful City Hall and left the old one empty. And still, city staffing and general fund decrease.  The new City was supposed to save money.  You played your shell game and now programs that were housed in a paid for building pay rent for your sterile monument.  The need to increase fees gets blamed on employees benefits, not your decisions.<br />
It seems to me you need to also consider increasing general fund revenues. You provoke the ire of government officials by chiding them for being weak when it comes to fiscal responsibility. How strong are you?  Will you stand up to the taxpayers that you invoke? Will you ask for their help to increase the general fund and help stop the deficit?  Will you ask them to pay a fair share of the cost for the services they want?  The reserves have been used, capital funds transferred, workforces decreased to bare bones, paychecks frozen or cut, proposed 2-tier retirement packages alienating potential recruits and short of declaring bankruptcy and shutting down city hall, what else can you propose?<br />
It has already started, but it could go farther: consolidate departments and decrease their numbers to align with the same number of CSA&#8217;s. Fewer departments and department/assistant department heads. Aim for an organization that is streamlined and breezy light on top and reaches out to all resident sectors on the lowest hierarchy.<br />
What else can you propose? How about proposing fewer council members?  Let&#8217;s go back to the general fund and the voters. Can you do it, Mr. Reed? If we residents want and need more services, then the simple painful truth is we the residents just need to PAY for those much needed services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randy A		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/23/pensions-crushing-san-jose-city-voters-eye-reform/#comment-2441</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy A]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9087#comment-2441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think San Jose needs to double the  size of the Police Department to keep in alignment with other big cities.  Currently a higher salary and retirement benefit was reasonable based on the minimal staffing the city has. Most police officers here in San Jose are better educated and trained and this saves the city from having to double their staffing.  San Jose historically has remained on top of criminal trends and was successful in keeping the city in the top 10 of safest cities in the United States with a population of 100,000 or more.  Kicking your police and fire in the face could result in a backlash that will cost the city more than the retirement system savings will.  The focus here has little to do with lowering the retirement costs, it is focused on giving the city the sole authority to invest the funds and possible transfer the system to the state PERS system which is a disaster.  Now that the voters have authorized the change, the new adjustments and the change in the perceptions of your emergency service personnel will most assuredly change.  Considering that no new hires are pending, the 1100 plus current employees will still be entitled to the old benefits which cannot be changed.  For the new fire fighters and Police they will do the same work and be compensated less, the attraction to join the city work force may have been significantly damaged. But then again the City does have a history of lowering its standards]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think San Jose needs to double the  size of the Police Department to keep in alignment with other big cities.  Currently a higher salary and retirement benefit was reasonable based on the minimal staffing the city has. Most police officers here in San Jose are better educated and trained and this saves the city from having to double their staffing.  San Jose historically has remained on top of criminal trends and was successful in keeping the city in the top 10 of safest cities in the United States with a population of 100,000 or more.  Kicking your police and fire in the face could result in a backlash that will cost the city more than the retirement system savings will.  The focus here has little to do with lowering the retirement costs, it is focused on giving the city the sole authority to invest the funds and possible transfer the system to the state PERS system which is a disaster.  Now that the voters have authorized the change, the new adjustments and the change in the perceptions of your emergency service personnel will most assuredly change.  Considering that no new hires are pending, the 1100 plus current employees will still be entitled to the old benefits which cannot be changed.  For the new fire fighters and Police they will do the same work and be compensated less, the attraction to join the city work force may have been significantly damaged. But then again the City does have a history of lowering its standards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fake OCO		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/23/pensions-crushing-san-jose-city-voters-eye-reform/#comment-2440</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fake OCO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9087#comment-2440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Robert Rizzo, if CalPERS tries to cut my pension payout by 50%, I will be sure to seek you out and include you in the class action lawsuit that will be filed. However, it is fortunate for us retirees, that we are in CA and not whatever redneck state you have emigrated from.
============
That&#039;s the seesaw I know-go get em girl!................GGrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Rizzo, if CalPERS tries to cut my pension payout by 50%, I will be sure to seek you out and include you in the class action lawsuit that will be filed. However, it is fortunate for us retirees, that we are in CA and not whatever redneck state you have emigrated from.<br />
============<br />
That&#8217;s the seesaw I know-go get em girl!&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.GGrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SeeSaw		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/23/pensions-crushing-san-jose-city-voters-eye-reform/#comment-2439</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SeeSaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9087#comment-2439</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It appears that San Jose officials gave away the store to their respective employee groups.  Didn&#039;t someone tell them that they are the ones who approve those contracts?  They appear to have their own retirement plans that are not in CalPERS; why are they telling CalPERS member entities how to run their respective retirement plans?  Many public entities have benefit constraints in place to maximize accumlations of sick leave and vacation, so that the employees are not able to cash out unlimited ammounts from these programs when they retire.  And, free health care for life is no longer a reality.

Robert Rizzo, if CalPERS tries to cut my pension payout by 50%, I will be sure to seek you out and include you in the class action lawsuit that will be filed.  However, it is fortunate for us retirees, that we are in CA and not whatever redneck state you have emigrated from.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that San Jose officials gave away the store to their respective employee groups.  Didn&#8217;t someone tell them that they are the ones who approve those contracts?  They appear to have their own retirement plans that are not in CalPERS; why are they telling CalPERS member entities how to run their respective retirement plans?  Many public entities have benefit constraints in place to maximize accumlations of sick leave and vacation, so that the employees are not able to cash out unlimited ammounts from these programs when they retire.  And, free health care for life is no longer a reality.</p>
<p>Robert Rizzo, if CalPERS tries to cut my pension payout by 50%, I will be sure to seek you out and include you in the class action lawsuit that will be filed.  However, it is fortunate for us retirees, that we are in CA and not whatever redneck state you have emigrated from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: howard beale		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/23/pensions-crushing-san-jose-city-voters-eye-reform/#comment-2438</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[howard beale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9087#comment-2438</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mr. Rizzo, I have started taking up a collection to erect a monumental statue (at least the heighth of the Statute of Liberty) to go on a pedestal at least 100 feet high.  I am hoping that pedestal and statue will put up in the middle of the park behind California&#039;s State Capitol Building.

California is going to end up being saved because of all you did at and for the City of Bell. It was a game changer.  Public employee unions and public employee administrators are now on the defensive and are on run and scrambling hard because of you.  Thank you for awakening the press and the non-public employee general public to the fact that they have been sucker punched by the public sector.  The name of Robert Rizzo will go down in the annals of California history as one of our most important and influential citizens.  Thank you so much Mr. Rizzo.  And by the way, how&#039;s the food and the medical care you&#039;ve been receiving this week?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Rizzo, I have started taking up a collection to erect a monumental statue (at least the heighth of the Statute of Liberty) to go on a pedestal at least 100 feet high.  I am hoping that pedestal and statue will put up in the middle of the park behind California&#8217;s State Capitol Building.</p>
<p>California is going to end up being saved because of all you did at and for the City of Bell. It was a game changer.  Public employee unions and public employee administrators are now on the defensive and are on run and scrambling hard because of you.  Thank you for awakening the press and the non-public employee general public to the fact that they have been sucker punched by the public sector.  The name of Robert Rizzo will go down in the annals of California history as one of our most important and influential citizens.  Thank you so much Mr. Rizzo.  And by the way, how&#8217;s the food and the medical care you&#8217;ve been receiving this week?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Rizzo		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/23/pensions-crushing-san-jose-city-voters-eye-reform/#comment-2437</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Rizzo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9087#comment-2437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is too late to put new employees on a second tier system. You need to reduce current retirees pensions payouts by 50%. Let them sue and let the courts decide. If the courts decide with the retired employees, then let San Jose declare bankruptcy. It will make former contracts null and void.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is too late to put new employees on a second tier system. You need to reduce current retirees pensions payouts by 50%. Let them sue and let the courts decide. If the courts decide with the retired employees, then let San Jose declare bankruptcy. It will make former contracts null and void.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fake OCO		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/23/pensions-crushing-san-jose-city-voters-eye-reform/#comment-2436</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fake OCO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9087#comment-2436</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Over the last decade, San Jose’s general fund dollars have grown by 21%, while the average cost per employee has gone up by 87%. For public safety employees – firefighters and police officers – the increase is even more dramatic at 99%.
=============================

LOL...the so called &quot;heros&quot; getting 10% compensation bumps for 10 years in a row........this is why every muni in this state is BK.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last decade, San Jose’s general fund dollars have grown by 21%, while the average cost per employee has gone up by 87%. For public safety employees – firefighters and police officers – the increase is even more dramatic at 99%.<br />
=============================</p>
<p>LOL&#8230;the so called &#8220;heros&#8221; getting 10% compensation bumps for 10 years in a row&#8230;&#8230;..this is why every muni in this state is BK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Generoyb		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/09/23/pensions-crushing-san-jose-city-voters-eye-reform/#comment-2435</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Generoyb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9087#comment-2435</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Years of elected officials selling their souls in exchange for a vote is a clear indication that the needs of the city are secondary to the needs of the politicians.  Any private business in this financial shape would immediately be declared BANKRUPT!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years of elected officials selling their souls in exchange for a vote is a clear indication that the needs of the city are secondary to the needs of the politicians.  Any private business in this financial shape would immediately be declared BANKRUPT!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-12 07:34:53 by W3 Total Cache
-->