<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: DMV May Investigate Whitman Nanny	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2010/10/05/dmv-may-investigate-whitman-nanny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/10/05/dmv-may-investigate-whitman-nanny/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:04:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Pedro		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/10/05/dmv-may-investigate-whitman-nanny/#comment-2534</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pedro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9432#comment-2534</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey stevefromsacto:

No... I do &quot;not stand with you,&quot; and neither does most Americans. This &quot;successful young college student” you speak of is an illegal invader who should have been arrested on the spot and scheduled for deportation. If she wants to go to college, she can go back to mexico and attend college in her rightful country of citizenship.

I admire Whitman for sticking to her principals and telling this illegal invader she should not be here, as American colleges should be reserved for American citizens and those legally in this country. Not illegal invaders!

If you have sympathy for a criminal illegal alien, then you can go stand with her in mexico. America is sick of these parasites, which have destroyed California and are working on the rest of the country, unless this issue is addressed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey stevefromsacto:</p>
<p>No&#8230; I do &#8220;not stand with you,&#8221; and neither does most Americans. This &#8220;successful young college student” you speak of is an illegal invader who should have been arrested on the spot and scheduled for deportation. If she wants to go to college, she can go back to mexico and attend college in her rightful country of citizenship.</p>
<p>I admire Whitman for sticking to her principals and telling this illegal invader she should not be here, as American colleges should be reserved for American citizens and those legally in this country. Not illegal invaders!</p>
<p>If you have sympathy for a criminal illegal alien, then you can go stand with her in mexico. America is sick of these parasites, which have destroyed California and are working on the rest of the country, unless this issue is addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Irving Schwartz		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/10/05/dmv-may-investigate-whitman-nanny/#comment-2533</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irving Schwartz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 04:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9432#comment-2533</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear stevefromsacto: In my opinion, Whitmans&#039;s response was not unbelievable. She was correct. This &quot;undocumented honors student&quot; is not a &quot;young successful immigrant&quot;. She is an illegal alien. For want of a better word, a &quot;wetback&quot;. If they will break one law, not getting papers, what is to stop them from breaking more? All they have to do is go to the local Home Depot and buy a drivers license and  social security card. Why she could probably get a job as a housekeeper with those papers. It is not &quot;Whitman’s awful, dismissive attitude towards a successful young college student that ought to define the choices Californians face in this election&quot;. It is the fact that we need to close the border, round up the illegals and ship them off. Just like Arizona. I would really like you to stand with this student. We could ship you off also.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear stevefromsacto: In my opinion, Whitmans&#8217;s response was not unbelievable. She was correct. This &#8220;undocumented honors student&#8221; is not a &#8220;young successful immigrant&#8221;. She is an illegal alien. For want of a better word, a &#8220;wetback&#8221;. If they will break one law, not getting papers, what is to stop them from breaking more? All they have to do is go to the local Home Depot and buy a drivers license and  social security card. Why she could probably get a job as a housekeeper with those papers. It is not &#8220;Whitman’s awful, dismissive attitude towards a successful young college student that ought to define the choices Californians face in this election&#8221;. It is the fact that we need to close the border, round up the illegals and ship them off. Just like Arizona. I would really like you to stand with this student. We could ship you off also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: stevefromsacto		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/10/05/dmv-may-investigate-whitman-nanny/#comment-2532</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stevefromsacto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9432#comment-2532</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Amazing.  All this whining and blaming Gloria Allred, Jerry Brown and the Tooth Fairy for Meg Whitman&#039;s screw-up.
Whatever happened to taking responsibility.

The real tragedy is that the public is ignoring Whitman&#039;s unbelievable response to question by a CSU honots student at last week&#039;s debate:

At Saturday&#039;s gubernatorial debate in Fresno held by Univision, an unidentified and undocumented honors student at Fresno State asked a question about the DREAM Act that, I argued, offered the most important moment of the debate. Whereas Jerry Brown made a strong moral defense of all California&#039;s children getting the chance to succeed in school and become citizens to contribute to our society, Whitman attacked the student and essentially told her she didn&#039;t belong in school and was taking the place of a California citizen.

Today the student has spoken out about the way her question was answered, in a press release from the California Young Democrats:

In an anonymous statement provided to CYD the student said, &quot;Ms. Whitman&#039;s response made me feel undeserving of my academic success... until I realized that I was not admitted into universities because I was undocumented but because I was a hard-working student who maintained great grades, got myself involved, and did countless hours of community service. My education is the only thing I really have in this country, besides my friends and family, and I don&#039;t understand why she would belittle my hard work and that of all other students in my situation. If Ms. Whitman cannot support young successful immigrants, how can she claim she will serve the Latino community?&quot;
This is a devastating response to Whitman. The student in question is a model to young Californians around the state, regardless of their background or immigration status. Every parent wishes they could have a child who has the kind of academic success this student has had.

She should be the kind of person we build California&#039;s future around. Instead, Meg Whitman believes this hardworking and successful young student should be kicked out of school, and probably kicked out of California. Whitman doesn&#039;t see a successful student, she instead sees someone who can at best be exploited before being tossed aside.

Whitman&#039;s former housekeeper may be getting the media attention. But it is Whitman&#039;s awful, dismissive attitude towards a successful young college student that ought to define the choices Californians face in this election.

I stand with this student. I hope you do too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing.  All this whining and blaming Gloria Allred, Jerry Brown and the Tooth Fairy for Meg Whitman&#8217;s screw-up.<br />
Whatever happened to taking responsibility.</p>
<p>The real tragedy is that the public is ignoring Whitman&#8217;s unbelievable response to question by a CSU honots student at last week&#8217;s debate:</p>
<p>At Saturday&#8217;s gubernatorial debate in Fresno held by Univision, an unidentified and undocumented honors student at Fresno State asked a question about the DREAM Act that, I argued, offered the most important moment of the debate. Whereas Jerry Brown made a strong moral defense of all California&#8217;s children getting the chance to succeed in school and become citizens to contribute to our society, Whitman attacked the student and essentially told her she didn&#8217;t belong in school and was taking the place of a California citizen.</p>
<p>Today the student has spoken out about the way her question was answered, in a press release from the California Young Democrats:</p>
<p>In an anonymous statement provided to CYD the student said, &#8220;Ms. Whitman&#8217;s response made me feel undeserving of my academic success&#8230; until I realized that I was not admitted into universities because I was undocumented but because I was a hard-working student who maintained great grades, got myself involved, and did countless hours of community service. My education is the only thing I really have in this country, besides my friends and family, and I don&#8217;t understand why she would belittle my hard work and that of all other students in my situation. If Ms. Whitman cannot support young successful immigrants, how can she claim she will serve the Latino community?&#8221;<br />
This is a devastating response to Whitman. The student in question is a model to young Californians around the state, regardless of their background or immigration status. Every parent wishes they could have a child who has the kind of academic success this student has had.</p>
<p>She should be the kind of person we build California&#8217;s future around. Instead, Meg Whitman believes this hardworking and successful young student should be kicked out of school, and probably kicked out of California. Whitman doesn&#8217;t see a successful student, she instead sees someone who can at best be exploited before being tossed aside.</p>
<p>Whitman&#8217;s former housekeeper may be getting the media attention. But it is Whitman&#8217;s awful, dismissive attitude towards a successful young college student that ought to define the choices Californians face in this election.</p>
<p>I stand with this student. I hope you do too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: deborah compton		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/10/05/dmv-may-investigate-whitman-nanny/#comment-2531</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deborah compton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9432#comment-2531</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Cut it out! Jerry Brown has been. Hunting for dirt on Whitman for months. Most likely, he used the influence
 of his position to acquire the knowledge. It is blackmail. Does
CA want a blackmailer as Governor? I&#039;d watch my back.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cut it out! Jerry Brown has been. Hunting for dirt on Whitman for months. Most likely, he used the influence<br />
 of his position to acquire the knowledge. It is blackmail. Does<br />
CA want a blackmailer as Governor? I&#8217;d watch my back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Tanton		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/10/05/dmv-may-investigate-whitman-nanny/#comment-2530</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Tanton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9432#comment-2530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As the chief law enforcement agent for the State, Jerry Brown is responsible for pursuing this case...will he or won&#039;t he?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the chief law enforcement agent for the State, Jerry Brown is responsible for pursuing this case&#8230;will he or won&#8217;t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DavidfromLosGatos		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/10/05/dmv-may-investigate-whitman-nanny/#comment-2529</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DavidfromLosGatos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 18:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9432#comment-2529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gloria Allred using a client for publicity purposes??

I&#039;m shocked!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gloria Allred using a client for publicity purposes??</p>
<p>I&#8217;m shocked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: S. Perry		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/10/05/dmv-may-investigate-whitman-nanny/#comment-2528</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S. Perry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 18:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9432#comment-2528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The implication that the DMV is going to refrain from investigating a possible issuer of the fraudulent license because of political circumstances is laughable. I&#039;m sure they have many other fraudulent license issuers to pursue; an investigation of this possible issuer is the course of action that would be politically motivated. Of course, Santillan could have obtained a fake ID from somebody outside of the DMV who made it.

That being said, this does nothing to change the fact that Whitman employed an undocumented worker. This story is insignificant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The implication that the DMV is going to refrain from investigating a possible issuer of the fraudulent license because of political circumstances is laughable. I&#8217;m sure they have many other fraudulent license issuers to pursue; an investigation of this possible issuer is the course of action that would be politically motivated. Of course, Santillan could have obtained a fake ID from somebody outside of the DMV who made it.</p>
<p>That being said, this does nothing to change the fact that Whitman employed an undocumented worker. This story is insignificant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: larry 62		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/10/05/dmv-may-investigate-whitman-nanny/#comment-2527</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[larry 62]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9432#comment-2527</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We need to learn how to do our own house keeping and lawn mowing, then all of these problems would go away.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to learn how to do our own house keeping and lawn mowing, then all of these problems would go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-19 21:53:10 by W3 Total Cache
-->