<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Business Property Not Under-taxed	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/12/business-property-not-under-taxed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/12/business-property-not-under-taxed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:15:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David from Oceanside		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/12/business-property-not-under-taxed/#comment-3059</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David from Oceanside]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=10820#comment-3059</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jennifer,

As a stay at home mom what time is left for your kids after your efforts in exposing the writers and bloggers here on this site?

If you have not already figured this out let me help you. No one cares about the comment section and not once has an opinion been changed as a result of a comment section.

Don&#039;t believe me? Check out the comment section of the North County Times Oceanside section for more than a month and you will find the same people professing their opinion with passion and the same others with their opposite opinion. Nobody and nothing changes as a result.

Do your kids a favor and put away the keyboard.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer,</p>
<p>As a stay at home mom what time is left for your kids after your efforts in exposing the writers and bloggers here on this site?</p>
<p>If you have not already figured this out let me help you. No one cares about the comment section and not once has an opinion been changed as a result of a comment section.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me? Check out the comment section of the North County Times Oceanside section for more than a month and you will find the same people professing their opinion with passion and the same others with their opposite opinion. Nobody and nothing changes as a result.</p>
<p>Do your kids a favor and put away the keyboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jennifer		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/12/business-property-not-under-taxed/#comment-3058</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=10820#comment-3058</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, Dear Readers, Wayne has laid it out in a nutshell.  You get to choose! Wayne is a certified commercial property appraiser who will tell you what to believe.  I am a stay-at-home mom who has given you the APNs (assessor parcel numbers) and Google map information so you can look decide for yourselves.  (And who got the local unsecured rolls to make sure that she captured all the lessee information in her own examples.)

You do have a choice -- meekly accept what you&#039;re told by An Expert or look for yourselves!  It isn&#039;t hard.  Many county assessors now provide parcel maps and assessment information online.  Google maps&#039; street view and overhead views will supplement your own knowledge of the business property around you.  And, to get the lessee data, call your assessor&#039;s office -- with a little prodding, they put that online, too!

And, yes, ladies -- before we ladle on the WHOLE tea party, we always make sure the table is level and the cloth is flat, don&#039;t we?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Dear Readers, Wayne has laid it out in a nutshell.  You get to choose! Wayne is a certified commercial property appraiser who will tell you what to believe.  I am a stay-at-home mom who has given you the APNs (assessor parcel numbers) and Google map information so you can look decide for yourselves.  (And who got the local unsecured rolls to make sure that she captured all the lessee information in her own examples.)</p>
<p>You do have a choice &#8212; meekly accept what you&#8217;re told by An Expert or look for yourselves!  It isn&#8217;t hard.  Many county assessors now provide parcel maps and assessment information online.  Google maps&#8217; street view and overhead views will supplement your own knowledge of the business property around you.  And, to get the lessee data, call your assessor&#8217;s office &#8212; with a little prodding, they put that online, too!</p>
<p>And, yes, ladies &#8212; before we ladle on the WHOLE tea party, we always make sure the table is level and the cloth is flat, don&#8217;t we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wayne Lusvardi		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/12/business-property-not-under-taxed/#comment-3057</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wayne Lusvardi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=10820#comment-3057</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jennifer - You are not to my knowledge a certified commercial property appraiser. I was an appraiser for 20 years. You should not try to evaluate fair property tax assessments for complicated commercial real estate which you do not understand.  As I stated in my above article, just because YOU find some inequality in property tax between two properties means nothing.  As I explained gas stations are on leased land.  So the landowner and the gas station lessee may be taxed separately.  So it just may appear that the tax on a gas station is lower when it is not.

Also commercial properties are not like residential properties which typically have only one use.  Commercial properties have MANY uses allowed under the zoning codes.  If there is a 100-year old house used for renting rooms on commercial zoned land which use should get taxed? Residential or commercial?  There are different types of gas stations:  gas stations with retail food stores, with billboards, with auto repair shops, with tire shops, or just pump gas.  Each different type of gas station is typically located on different types of properties.  Key corner properties on major arterial roadways with high traffic counts near a freeway offramp are the best sites.  Minor corner properties in an older neighborhood are the least desirable for gas stations.  These are complex issues which only those qualified can understand.

That is the beauty of Prop 13 - a sale, is a sale, is a sale.  Whatever the property last sold for sets the assessed value and that base value is not increased until the property is re-sold. The assessment ratio however is typically increased by 2% per year.     That is the way capital gains taxes work on stock.  If the paper value of stock goes up one day should you be taxed on that value which you never realized?  NO!!!!!!!  Capital gains taxes only apply when stock is sold and you realize a profit (or loss).  It is the same way with properties under Prop 13.

Prop 13 is a TAX, not a welfare benefit.  AS I STATED IN MY ARTICLE YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE WHOLE TAX BURDEN NOT MERELY PROPERTY TAXES.  The overall tax burden in California is the highest in the nation by any measure.  California has a spending problem not a revenue problem.

Jennifer, there is no amount of information that I could present to persuade you otherwise. You would just keep sending long emails and try and find reasons to support your belief that Prop 13 is a welfare benefit.   This response is merely for third parties reading this website to evaluate for themselves.  Nonetheless, best wishes to you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer &#8211; You are not to my knowledge a certified commercial property appraiser. I was an appraiser for 20 years. You should not try to evaluate fair property tax assessments for complicated commercial real estate which you do not understand.  As I stated in my above article, just because YOU find some inequality in property tax between two properties means nothing.  As I explained gas stations are on leased land.  So the landowner and the gas station lessee may be taxed separately.  So it just may appear that the tax on a gas station is lower when it is not.</p>
<p>Also commercial properties are not like residential properties which typically have only one use.  Commercial properties have MANY uses allowed under the zoning codes.  If there is a 100-year old house used for renting rooms on commercial zoned land which use should get taxed? Residential or commercial?  There are different types of gas stations:  gas stations with retail food stores, with billboards, with auto repair shops, with tire shops, or just pump gas.  Each different type of gas station is typically located on different types of properties.  Key corner properties on major arterial roadways with high traffic counts near a freeway offramp are the best sites.  Minor corner properties in an older neighborhood are the least desirable for gas stations.  These are complex issues which only those qualified can understand.</p>
<p>That is the beauty of Prop 13 &#8211; a sale, is a sale, is a sale.  Whatever the property last sold for sets the assessed value and that base value is not increased until the property is re-sold. The assessment ratio however is typically increased by 2% per year.     That is the way capital gains taxes work on stock.  If the paper value of stock goes up one day should you be taxed on that value which you never realized?  NO!!!!!!!  Capital gains taxes only apply when stock is sold and you realize a profit (or loss).  It is the same way with properties under Prop 13.</p>
<p>Prop 13 is a TAX, not a welfare benefit.  AS I STATED IN MY ARTICLE YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE WHOLE TAX BURDEN NOT MERELY PROPERTY TAXES.  The overall tax burden in California is the highest in the nation by any measure.  California has a spending problem not a revenue problem.</p>
<p>Jennifer, there is no amount of information that I could present to persuade you otherwise. You would just keep sending long emails and try and find reasons to support your belief that Prop 13 is a welfare benefit.   This response is merely for third parties reading this website to evaluate for themselves.  Nonetheless, best wishes to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mary Gribble		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/12/business-property-not-under-taxed/#comment-3056</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Gribble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=10820#comment-3056</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jennifer, did I understand the concept correctly?  Does Ms.Jennifer believe weakening Proposition 13 for business owners, (strapped homeowners will not  follow), does not suggest she also believes that while the(electorate)cat&#039;s away, the mice (State Legislature) will not play?  Citizen taxpayers cannot realistically keep score. They are given scanty data, many opposing facts are stricken from the record and countless obstacles exist to discovery of what is going on in Sacramento. Hard common sense dictates that the one way to stop a drunken sailor does not include endless missions of mercy in the belief that he will soon give up the bottle, but prevention of the chaos (to taxpayers), also gifting the happy drunk with wisdom by refusing to load his already adequately lined bell-bottoms with more cash. What does she think of this idea: interest investigative watch-dogs to document where and to whom the tax dollars were sent, (not an unsophisticated assignment), then let the buyer beware?   Why are our US jobs being outsourced?  Same road block as in California:  unions. They once protected what was slave-like labor, but today, they have overstepped this line with un-pretty consequence. .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer, did I understand the concept correctly?  Does Ms.Jennifer believe weakening Proposition 13 for business owners, (strapped homeowners will not  follow), does not suggest she also believes that while the(electorate)cat&#8217;s away, the mice (State Legislature) will not play?  Citizen taxpayers cannot realistically keep score. They are given scanty data, many opposing facts are stricken from the record and countless obstacles exist to discovery of what is going on in Sacramento. Hard common sense dictates that the one way to stop a drunken sailor does not include endless missions of mercy in the belief that he will soon give up the bottle, but prevention of the chaos (to taxpayers), also gifting the happy drunk with wisdom by refusing to load his already adequately lined bell-bottoms with more cash. What does she think of this idea: interest investigative watch-dogs to document where and to whom the tax dollars were sent, (not an unsophisticated assignment), then let the buyer beware?   Why are our US jobs being outsourced?  Same road block as in California:  unions. They once protected what was slave-like labor, but today, they have overstepped this line with un-pretty consequence. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jennifer		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/12/business-property-not-under-taxed/#comment-3055</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 02:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=10820#comment-3055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bravo, Steven -- and while you are pushing to fix the spending side of the broken system, I am pushing to fix the revenue side.  Had you spent any time in business, you would understand that this is how businesspeople approach problems of this kind.  No business survives for long by fixating on expenses.

Meanwhile, haven&#039;t you observed how Prop 13 has fed the union machine?  Where were you in 1978?  When did you come to California?  Prop 13 has both lulled homeowners out of our local debates (or are you unaware that property taxes fund local services?) and created gush-and-sputter funding that strengthens unions.  When the property market tanks (like now), unions circle the wagons to protect their employees -- when it rebounds, they&#039;re first at the spigot.  Who wouldn&#039;t join a union in a state with an unpredictable revenue flow?

But perhaps you ARE an avid supporter of a Prop 2-1/2-like structure (after all, it was those Bay Staters who staged the first Tea Party)?  There, community tax growth is strictly capped and individual properties maintain appropriate value parity, rather than creating personal entitlements.  As a result, the citizenry has to stay involved in decision making -- and, amazingly, they&#039;ve managed to maintain a school system that turns out educated productive residents for tomorrow.

In the meantime, appreciate that it&#039;s homegrown analysts like me who keep your institute funded!  Imagine if there were no one questioning the billions in subsidies that benefit a small percentage of commercial landowners.  Horrors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo, Steven &#8212; and while you are pushing to fix the spending side of the broken system, I am pushing to fix the revenue side.  Had you spent any time in business, you would understand that this is how businesspeople approach problems of this kind.  No business survives for long by fixating on expenses.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, haven&#8217;t you observed how Prop 13 has fed the union machine?  Where were you in 1978?  When did you come to California?  Prop 13 has both lulled homeowners out of our local debates (or are you unaware that property taxes fund local services?) and created gush-and-sputter funding that strengthens unions.  When the property market tanks (like now), unions circle the wagons to protect their employees &#8212; when it rebounds, they&#8217;re first at the spigot.  Who wouldn&#8217;t join a union in a state with an unpredictable revenue flow?</p>
<p>But perhaps you ARE an avid supporter of a Prop 2-1/2-like structure (after all, it was those Bay Staters who staged the first Tea Party)?  There, community tax growth is strictly capped and individual properties maintain appropriate value parity, rather than creating personal entitlements.  As a result, the citizenry has to stay involved in decision making &#8212; and, amazingly, they&#8217;ve managed to maintain a school system that turns out educated productive residents for tomorrow.</p>
<p>In the meantime, appreciate that it&#8217;s homegrown analysts like me who keep your institute funded!  Imagine if there were no one questioning the billions in subsidies that benefit a small percentage of commercial landowners.  Horrors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Greenhut		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/12/business-property-not-under-taxed/#comment-3054</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Greenhut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=10820#comment-3054</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It obviously hasn&#039;t escaped me, Jennifer, which is why I push for pension reform, budget reform and all the many other reforms that legislators refuse to embrace because it means taking on the unions and special interest groups that benefit from the current mess. They don&#039;t want to fix a broken system, especially when they have activists like you who can champion massive tax hikes that would continue to enable the spendthrifts to keep behaving as they have been for years! Seriously, do you think the current political establishment will change its ways if it gets billions more in tax revenues, or do you think they will just keep spending until they need even more cash? Then they&#039;ll find new places to raise revenues.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It obviously hasn&#8217;t escaped me, Jennifer, which is why I push for pension reform, budget reform and all the many other reforms that legislators refuse to embrace because it means taking on the unions and special interest groups that benefit from the current mess. They don&#8217;t want to fix a broken system, especially when they have activists like you who can champion massive tax hikes that would continue to enable the spendthrifts to keep behaving as they have been for years! Seriously, do you think the current political establishment will change its ways if it gets billions more in tax revenues, or do you think they will just keep spending until they need even more cash? Then they&#8217;ll find new places to raise revenues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jennifer		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/12/business-property-not-under-taxed/#comment-3053</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=10820#comment-3053</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Steven, has it escaped your attention that the already unsteady business climate is further upset by the deep deficit we are already running?  $24B by latest count?  $4B -- a significant amount of which is flowing out of state -- might stabilize the ship a little, while spending cuts do more.  And taking that from landlords who are currently paying half of what they did, in real dollars, in 1978 makes good fiscal sense.

You, meanwhile, are lobbying for the collapse of California.  Who, exactly, does that benefit?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven, has it escaped your attention that the already unsteady business climate is further upset by the deep deficit we are already running?  $24B by latest count?  $4B &#8212; a significant amount of which is flowing out of state &#8212; might stabilize the ship a little, while spending cuts do more.  And taking that from landlords who are currently paying half of what they did, in real dollars, in 1978 makes good fiscal sense.</p>
<p>You, meanwhile, are lobbying for the collapse of California.  Who, exactly, does that benefit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Greenhut		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/12/business-property-not-under-taxed/#comment-3052</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Greenhut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=10820#comment-3052</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ultimately, you are lobbying for massive tax increases for commercial users, which will harm an already unsteady business climate in the name of equality. The new tax revenues your proposal would raise would be squandered by the Legislature and the end result would be much higher property taxes for businesses in order to fund our bloated government, which is not what the state needs, and certainly not now during a recession.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ultimately, you are lobbying for massive tax increases for commercial users, which will harm an already unsteady business climate in the name of equality. The new tax revenues your proposal would raise would be squandered by the Legislature and the end result would be much higher property taxes for businesses in order to fund our bloated government, which is not what the state needs, and certainly not now during a recession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jennifer		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/12/business-property-not-under-taxed/#comment-3051</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=10820#comment-3051</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Pshaw, Steven.  Though it&#039;s fascinating how &quot;supporters&quot; of Prop 13 immediately switch the topic to residential real estate.  And pretend that other solutions, e.g., Massachusetts&#039; Prop 2-1/2, don&#039;t exist.  Such solutions maintain parity between property owners AND control overall spending.

Bottom line:  every resident is getting poorer as a small group of commercial real estate owners take 800% advantage of Prop 13.  In Los Angeles County, per the Assessor&#039;s annual report, Commercial/Industrial property has fallen from 46.6% to 30.8% of the total roll.

Why?  Why don&#039;t you analyze it and find out?  You&#039;ll discover that some of the change is exogenous (falling value of the homeowner&#039;s exemption, land use changes), but a lot of it is the ability to transfer business property ownership without incurring reassessment.

The effects?  First, an uneven and economically unsound playing field for business property -- serving as a disincentive for new or growing businesses to expand in California.  Second, disintegrating public schools and state-wide fiscal instability -- which further discourages new businesses.  Third, incentives for public employee unions to tighten their grip on their members.

Business property should be reassessed every 15-20 years if it hasn&#039;t gone through an arm&#039;s length transaction.  Why are we handing one in five commercial property owners an 80% tax subsidy -- and strangling residents and local businesses in the process?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pshaw, Steven.  Though it&#8217;s fascinating how &#8220;supporters&#8221; of Prop 13 immediately switch the topic to residential real estate.  And pretend that other solutions, e.g., Massachusetts&#8217; Prop 2-1/2, don&#8217;t exist.  Such solutions maintain parity between property owners AND control overall spending.</p>
<p>Bottom line:  every resident is getting poorer as a small group of commercial real estate owners take 800% advantage of Prop 13.  In Los Angeles County, per the Assessor&#8217;s annual report, Commercial/Industrial property has fallen from 46.6% to 30.8% of the total roll.</p>
<p>Why?  Why don&#8217;t you analyze it and find out?  You&#8217;ll discover that some of the change is exogenous (falling value of the homeowner&#8217;s exemption, land use changes), but a lot of it is the ability to transfer business property ownership without incurring reassessment.</p>
<p>The effects?  First, an uneven and economically unsound playing field for business property &#8212; serving as a disincentive for new or growing businesses to expand in California.  Second, disintegrating public schools and state-wide fiscal instability &#8212; which further discourages new businesses.  Third, incentives for public employee unions to tighten their grip on their members.</p>
<p>Business property should be reassessed every 15-20 years if it hasn&#8217;t gone through an arm&#8217;s length transaction.  Why are we handing one in five commercial property owners an 80% tax subsidy &#8212; and strangling residents and local businesses in the process?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Greenhut		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/12/business-property-not-under-taxed/#comment-3050</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Greenhut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=10820#comment-3050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s no doubt that Prop. 13 creates an uneven distribution of property taxes. My home taxes are much higher than my neighbors&#039; taxes, because they have lived there for 25 years. Foes of Prop. 13 have a solution -- raise everyone&#039;s taxes dramatically! We&#039;ll all be equal, but most of us will be much poorer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no doubt that Prop. 13 creates an uneven distribution of property taxes. My home taxes are much higher than my neighbors&#8217; taxes, because they have lived there for 25 years. Foes of Prop. 13 have a solution &#8212; raise everyone&#8217;s taxes dramatically! We&#8217;ll all be equal, but most of us will be much poorer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-14 16:42:05 by W3 Total Cache
-->