<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: State Court&#039;s Clarity On Free Speech	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/28/state-courts-clarity-on-free-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/28/state-courts-clarity-on-free-speech/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:20:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Gallagher		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/28/state-courts-clarity-on-free-speech/#comment-3176</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Gallagher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=11323#comment-3176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I  think the cases are apples and oranges and the court rightfully held different rulings. Malls, by  virtue of their makeup are in fact public forums. I think that property owners do give up rights that would be afforded them under the single store ruling. People flock to the malls; people don&#039;t flock to the town square (unless there is a tree lighting ceremony, but that&#039;s another ruling).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  think the cases are apples and oranges and the court rightfully held different rulings. Malls, by  virtue of their makeup are in fact public forums. I think that property owners do give up rights that would be afforded them under the single store ruling. People flock to the malls; people don&#8217;t flock to the town square (unless there is a tree lighting ceremony, but that&#8217;s another ruling).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Seiler		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/28/state-courts-clarity-on-free-speech/#comment-3175</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Seiler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=11323#comment-3175</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A step backward is new AG Kamala Harris, who won&#039;t enforce the court&#039;s ruling, or any ruling or law that doesn&#039;t fit with her North Korean legal ideology.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A step backward is new AG Kamala Harris, who won&#8217;t enforce the court&#8217;s ruling, or any ruling or law that doesn&#8217;t fit with her North Korean legal ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-13 10:29:32 by W3 Total Cache
-->