https://calwatchdog.com/2010/12/27/new-years-water-bond-resolutions/ Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:38:46 +0000 hourly 1 https://calwatchdog.com/2010/12/27/new-years-water-bond-resolutions/#comment-128490 Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:38:46 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=12246#comment-128490 […] flood projects thus far brought to the public’s attention by this writer as far back as 2010 (see here and […]

]]> https://calwatchdog.com/2010/12/27/new-years-water-bond-resolutions/#comment-3431 Wed, 29 Dec 2010 08:57:34 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=12246#comment-3431 Thank you Bruce Ross for the comment.
You are right, Prop 12 is mainly a parks bond. But, according to the LAO $278 million of Prop 12 funds went to restoration of fish habitats (i.e., water).
http://www.lao.ca.gov/2000/052500_parkwater_bonds/052500_parkwater_bonds.html.

]]> https://calwatchdog.com/2010/12/27/new-years-water-bond-resolutions/#comment-3430 Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:16:09 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=12246#comment-3430 Clean water’s like Mom and Apple Pie and bond proponents slip it in the title whenever they can, but Prop. 12 was a parks bond. A helpful breakdown is here: http://www.lao.ca.gov/2000/052500_parkwater_bonds/052500_parkwater_bonds.html

]]> https://calwatchdog.com/2010/12/27/new-years-water-bond-resolutions/#comment-3429 Tue, 28 Dec 2010 20:49:06 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=12246#comment-3429 What a fine and informative article. We can only hope the incoming Brown admin will adopt these well-thought-out recommendations. But when they are the ones who always drink too much and we are the ones who always get the hangover, can we really expect anything to change?

]]>