Comments on: Goodwin Liu Mangles the Constitution

By: David from Oceanside

David from Oceanside — Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:52:14 +0000

To some extent liberty has not recovered from Roosevelts court packing scheme. The supreme court backed down and began to give the progressives the meaningless constitution they required to institute their illegal policies.

The constitution began to mean absurd things such as the interstate commerce act authorizing the federal government to regulate wheat grown on private land for personal consumption because the wheat grown for personal consumption is wheat not purchased from the open market and thus effecting interstate commerce.

A “living Constitution” is the progressives wet dream, the death of liberty and the driving force in government tyranny.

By: Rex ther Wonder Dog!

Rex ther Wonder Dog! — Sat, 30 Jul 2011 08:05:37 +0000

The question isn’t whether the policies cited by Liu are effective; it’s whether they’re constitutional
=====================
The question of what is or is not constitutional always comes down to ideology. There is NO rigth or concrete answer.

By: So. Perry

So. Perry — Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:09:28 +0000

The question isn’t whether the policies cited by Liu are effective; it’s whether they’re constitutional. Would you say those policies aren’t constitutional?

http://wildernessletters.wordpress.com/2011/07/29/goodwin-liu-isnt-a-radical/