Comments on: Kamala Harris’ Misuse of Power

By: Oliver

Oliver — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:26:41 +0000

If I have learned on thing it is that the wording of the ballot measure means nothing. What matters in CA is who has the most money to put the most ads on TV. Generelly speaking the unions win because they have the most money and no ethics. They lie on TV about ballot measures and use any and all types of propaganda to sway voters.

Sadly this has been a very effective tactic in our once great state. The ignorance of the voting public has allowed theses leaches to amass great wealth and power at the expense of the ordinary citizen.

RIP California it was great knowing you.

By: stevefromsacto

stevefromsacto — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:34:30 +0000

John, Steve and the gang wouldn’t be happy unless Attorney General Harris copied the language for the initiative directly from the pages of CalWatchDog. And then they’d bitch because she didn’t do it sooner.

Maybe the real reason they don’t like Ms. Harris is because she has the courage to go after white collar criminals and government contractors who are robbing taxpayers of billions of dollars a year

Here’s an example: Last year, Ms. Harris nailed medical laboratory giant Quest Diagnostics for more than $240 MILLION for overcharging taxpayers through the MediCal program.

But while the good folks at the Watchdog and their supporters will howl with indignation at the first suggestion of someone getting Food Stamps illegally, there was no mention of this huge fraud against the people of California–until now. I wonder why.

By: CalWatchdog

CalWatchdog — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:34:28 +0000

Let’s hope the courts sort out the wording. But this is another indication that California has been teaching North Korea how to govern.

— John Seiler

By: Beelzebub

Beelzebub — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:14:55 +0000

What do you expect? These leeches will do whatever it takes to fight legitimate pension reform even if it means putting propoganda and falsehoods in official ballot summaries that are supposed to be protected and held sacred by law. They want you to survive off social security in your old age while they live the high life on big 80%, 90% or 100% pensions – so you can finance both your retirement and theirs simultaneously.

Even if the initiatives are approved there’s a better than not chance that the courts will strike them down. After all, California judges are part of the pension system too. They were able to dismiss the retroactive pension suit, right??? What makes you think that they won’t strike this down too???