<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Government Nannies Attack Food Trucks	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/08/government-nannies-attack-food-trucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/08/government-nannies-attack-food-trucks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:11:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: queeg		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/08/government-nannies-attack-food-trucks/#comment-15704</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[queeg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=26745#comment-15704</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There should limits on the length and frequency of postings....a few are smothering this site with sheer pap!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There should limits on the length and frequency of postings&#8230;.a few are smothering this site with sheer pap!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beelzebub		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/08/government-nannies-attack-food-trucks/#comment-15703</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beelzebub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 06:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=26745#comment-15703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think the kids should brown bag it like everyone in my schools had to do. None of us starved. The schools shouldn&#039;t be in the food business. It is the PARENTS responsibility to feed their kids. The poor ones get food stamps to pay for it. How long does it take to make a ham sandwich, slice a few carrot sticks, grab an apple or orange and put a piece of cake in the paper bag? 5 minutes? How long does it take to make a bowl of oatmeal with a sliced banana for the kid before he goes to school? 5 minutes? What a friggin&#039; spoiled society we&#039;ve become! 

Btw, I wonder if the food servers at the schools are government employees with pensions too? 

So a  dish washer and bus boy can retire with a 2.5%@55 pension too?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the kids should brown bag it like everyone in my schools had to do. None of us starved. The schools shouldn&#8217;t be in the food business. It is the PARENTS responsibility to feed their kids. The poor ones get food stamps to pay for it. How long does it take to make a ham sandwich, slice a few carrot sticks, grab an apple or orange and put a piece of cake in the paper bag? 5 minutes? How long does it take to make a bowl of oatmeal with a sliced banana for the kid before he goes to school? 5 minutes? What a friggin&#8217; spoiled society we&#8217;ve become! </p>
<p>Btw, I wonder if the food servers at the schools are government employees with pensions too? </p>
<p>So a  dish washer and bus boy can retire with a 2.5%@55 pension too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rex The Wonder Dog!		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/08/government-nannies-attack-food-trucks/#comment-15702</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex The Wonder Dog!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 02:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=26745#comment-15702</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Most of these kids get free breakfast, lunch and dinner at their schools anyway, right?&lt;/b&gt;

Only breakfest and lunch for free, and in poor areas it is 95% of the students. You do not even want to ask what the costs are, and as far as nutrition, OMG is that a laffer, school breakfests and ESPECIALLY LUNCHES are nothing but high calorie, high fat, low nutrient garbage-like pizza, hot dogs and hamburgers.......the lumches most schools serve is garnage compared to a vending truck.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Most of these kids get free breakfast, lunch and dinner at their schools anyway, right?</b></p>
<p>Only breakfest and lunch for free, and in poor areas it is 95% of the students. You do not even want to ask what the costs are, and as far as nutrition, OMG is that a laffer, school breakfests and ESPECIALLY LUNCHES are nothing but high calorie, high fat, low nutrient garbage-like pizza, hot dogs and hamburgers&#8230;&#8230;.the lumches most schools serve is garnage compared to a vending truck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SactoMoFo		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/08/government-nannies-attack-food-trucks/#comment-15701</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SactoMoFo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 23:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=26745#comment-15701</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Last night, Assm. Monning made a few amendments to #AB1678 in order to stem the massive tide of public opinion casting him as an enemy of commerce - and of small business especially - in California. There are a number of new provisions to the bill (such as a 500 foot no-sell zone, instead of the previously-proposed 1500 foot radius), all added specifically to fool the public into believing that there is some actual legitimate foundation to this legislation.

Unfortunately, no matter how much Assemblyman Monning caves on this, there is still one simple truth that invalidates the bill in its entirety: there is no data available whatsoever to prove that availability of unhealthy food (outside of the home) actually correlates in any statistically significant way with obesity. In fact, RAND recently found that that there no identifiable causal relationship between having food trucks around schools - or vending machines, for that matter - and students being overweight.

Californians should absolutely never stand for a law being introduced without any science - without even a shred of data! - to back it up. This is bad lawmaking and bad science, it&#039;s anti-intellectual and irrational. There is nothing about this bill that can be accurately said to be helpful for anyone. The fact that Monning&#039;s office and the CFPA have spent so much time defending something like this, without even the slightest understanding of the link between accurate scientific methods and lawmaking, is mind-boggling. It&#039;s just a tremendous amount of waste by otherwise intelligent people who could be putting their energies toward helping Californians.

Childhood obesity is a serious issue. Let&#039;s not try to deal with it by passing &quot;feel good&quot; legislation that does nothing to address its root causes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night, Assm. Monning made a few amendments to #AB1678 in order to stem the massive tide of public opinion casting him as an enemy of commerce &#8211; and of small business especially &#8211; in California. There are a number of new provisions to the bill (such as a 500 foot no-sell zone, instead of the previously-proposed 1500 foot radius), all added specifically to fool the public into believing that there is some actual legitimate foundation to this legislation.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, no matter how much Assemblyman Monning caves on this, there is still one simple truth that invalidates the bill in its entirety: there is no data available whatsoever to prove that availability of unhealthy food (outside of the home) actually correlates in any statistically significant way with obesity. In fact, RAND recently found that that there no identifiable causal relationship between having food trucks around schools &#8211; or vending machines, for that matter &#8211; and students being overweight.</p>
<p>Californians should absolutely never stand for a law being introduced without any science &#8211; without even a shred of data! &#8211; to back it up. This is bad lawmaking and bad science, it&#8217;s anti-intellectual and irrational. There is nothing about this bill that can be accurately said to be helpful for anyone. The fact that Monning&#8217;s office and the CFPA have spent so much time defending something like this, without even the slightest understanding of the link between accurate scientific methods and lawmaking, is mind-boggling. It&#8217;s just a tremendous amount of waste by otherwise intelligent people who could be putting their energies toward helping Californians.</p>
<p>Childhood obesity is a serious issue. Let&#8217;s not try to deal with it by passing &#8220;feel good&#8221; legislation that does nothing to address its root causes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beelzebub		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/08/government-nannies-attack-food-trucks/#comment-15700</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beelzebub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=26745#comment-15700</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Most of these kids get free breakfast, lunch and dinner at their schools anyway, right? Why would they use a food truck when the taxpayers pay for all their food? Do food trucks accept food stamps?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of these kids get free breakfast, lunch and dinner at their schools anyway, right? Why would they use a food truck when the taxpayers pay for all their food? Do food trucks accept food stamps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: queeg		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/08/government-nannies-attack-food-trucks/#comment-15699</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[queeg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=26745#comment-15699</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They control your schools, they destroyed morals, they rule your health care, they seperate us into miserable little groups and THEY WILL CONTROL WHERE,  WHAT. WHEN you eat...

What a bunch of saps!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They control your schools, they destroyed morals, they rule your health care, they seperate us into miserable little groups and THEY WILL CONTROL WHERE,  WHAT. WHEN you eat&#8230;</p>
<p>What a bunch of saps!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Liz		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/08/government-nannies-attack-food-trucks/#comment-15698</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=26745#comment-15698</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Couple of problems with the story that should be addressed before banning food trucks.

Name me one school that is in session from 6 am to 6 pm.

If students are leaving campus to go to food trucks, then I think the schools have a bigger problem. Why are they allowing it? What are they going to do when some child gets hurt or killed off campus during school hours? Sounds like a major lawsuit waiting to happen.

Are there not enough problems in the school systems for politicians and school officials to think about (like educating these kids) before they delve into the ridiculous stuff (like food trucks)?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple of problems with the story that should be addressed before banning food trucks.</p>
<p>Name me one school that is in session from 6 am to 6 pm.</p>
<p>If students are leaving campus to go to food trucks, then I think the schools have a bigger problem. Why are they allowing it? What are they going to do when some child gets hurt or killed off campus during school hours? Sounds like a major lawsuit waiting to happen.</p>
<p>Are there not enough problems in the school systems for politicians and school officials to think about (like educating these kids) before they delve into the ridiculous stuff (like food trucks)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beelzebub		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/08/government-nannies-attack-food-trucks/#comment-15697</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beelzebub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 06:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=26745#comment-15697</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My guess is that the large majority of American cardiologists and cardio-thoracic surgeons would probably respectfully disagree with Dr. Lundell. Deaths from heart attacks have been measurably reduced since the advent of the statin drugs. And societies that consume more fish, vegetables or the classic Mediterranian diet have significantly lower incidence of heart disease than we do in America. Inflammation is certainly a factor in heart disease and morbidity - but probably synergistic with other disease like high cholesterol, high blood pressure, high blood sugar. Smoking and lack of exercise are big risk factors. It&#039;s been found that men with pear-shaped bodies have a significantly increased risk for heart disease and sudden death. Pear shaped bodies are usually a result of eating too much fat and not getting enough exercise. I am no expert but have studied the medical literature since my family has a history of heart disease.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that the large majority of American cardiologists and cardio-thoracic surgeons would probably respectfully disagree with Dr. Lundell. Deaths from heart attacks have been measurably reduced since the advent of the statin drugs. And societies that consume more fish, vegetables or the classic Mediterranian diet have significantly lower incidence of heart disease than we do in America. Inflammation is certainly a factor in heart disease and morbidity &#8211; but probably synergistic with other disease like high cholesterol, high blood pressure, high blood sugar. Smoking and lack of exercise are big risk factors. It&#8217;s been found that men with pear-shaped bodies have a significantly increased risk for heart disease and sudden death. Pear shaped bodies are usually a result of eating too much fat and not getting enough exercise. I am no expert but have studied the medical literature since my family has a history of heart disease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CalWatchdog		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/08/government-nannies-attack-food-trucks/#comment-15696</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 06:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=26745#comment-15696</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Signs of the Times has a story by Dr. Dwight Lundell who says that everything that we&#039;ve been told to do by researchers and doctors to increase cardiovascular health is actually contributing to cardiovascular problems.

Statins like Lipitor, and low-fat diets do not work, according to this doc. And much of this has been promoted by the government FDA, which also approved Lipitor.

This doctor said that he has done more than 150,000 open heart surgeries, and the real cause of heart disease is inflammation - much of it caused and increased by our current healthy heart diet. 

&quot;These recommendations are no longer scientifically or morally defensible. The discovery a few years ago that inflammation in the artery wall is the real cause of heart disease is slowly leading to a paradigm shift in how heart disease and other chronic ailments will be treated.&quot;

He reported that a diet low in fat and high in polyunsaturated fats and carbohydrates, causes repeated injury to our blood vessels. &quot;This repeated injury creates chronic inflammation leading to heart disease, stroke, diabetes and obesity.&quot;
So much for government-approved health and dietary recommendations.
here is the link: http://www.sott.net/articles/show/242516-Heart-Surgeon-Speaks-Out-On-What-Really-Causes-Heart-Disease

- Katy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Signs of the Times has a story by Dr. Dwight Lundell who says that everything that we&#8217;ve been told to do by researchers and doctors to increase cardiovascular health is actually contributing to cardiovascular problems.</p>
<p>Statins like Lipitor, and low-fat diets do not work, according to this doc. And much of this has been promoted by the government FDA, which also approved Lipitor.</p>
<p>This doctor said that he has done more than 150,000 open heart surgeries, and the real cause of heart disease is inflammation &#8211; much of it caused and increased by our current healthy heart diet. </p>
<p>&#8220;These recommendations are no longer scientifically or morally defensible. The discovery a few years ago that inflammation in the artery wall is the real cause of heart disease is slowly leading to a paradigm shift in how heart disease and other chronic ailments will be treated.&#8221;</p>
<p>He reported that a diet low in fat and high in polyunsaturated fats and carbohydrates, causes repeated injury to our blood vessels. &#8220;This repeated injury creates chronic inflammation leading to heart disease, stroke, diabetes and obesity.&#8221;<br />
So much for government-approved health and dietary recommendations.<br />
here is the link: <a href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/242516-Heart-Surgeon-Speaks-Out-On-What-Really-Causes-Heart-Disease" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.sott.net/articles/show/242516-Heart-Surgeon-Speaks-Out-On-What-Really-Causes-Heart-Disease</a></p>
<p>&#8211; Katy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beelzebub		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/08/government-nannies-attack-food-trucks/#comment-15695</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beelzebub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 05:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=26745#comment-15695</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t like food trucks either. They promote a third world atmosphere and hurt people who invested hundreds of thousands of dollars to open up restaurants in our communities. I don&#039;t want food trucks parking in the neighborhood and blasting their horns. If they want to get into the food business open up a restaurant. What will the next fad be? Photos with a painted donkey?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like food trucks either. They promote a third world atmosphere and hurt people who invested hundreds of thousands of dollars to open up restaurants in our communities. I don&#8217;t want food trucks parking in the neighborhood and blasting their horns. If they want to get into the food business open up a restaurant. What will the next fad be? Photos with a painted donkey?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-20 00:58:57 by W3 Total Cache
-->