Comments on: ‘Unemployed’ Protected From Employers

By: Kris

Kris — Wed, 28 Mar 2012 05:38:54 +0000

What’s the problem here. According to most of our corruptocrats unemployment is going away, foreclosures and the like are non existent, Banks are lending our money back to us, what’s the problem here, life is good, so say our corruptocrats.

By: sean

sean — Mon, 26 Mar 2012 05:05:31 +0000

Just like Europe – who is going to take a chance on hiring any new employees here? This will decrease the flexibility of the workforce, which should be dictated by the economy, not for the politicians that think everything can be fixed into some sort of utopia just by passing laws on top of laws….

this while the population of California pays no attention and reelects these folks into office year after year.

By: queeg

queeg — Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:59:03 +0000

I am considering selling an totalee PC employment screening device….

It has feathers, a wood shaft and a pointeee metal tip.

Showed prototype to a HR manager….he called it a DART!

Directions: place 100 resumes on ground in parking lot….throw the device from company building roof….HIRE where pointee tip lands.

By: David H

David H — Thu, 22 Mar 2012 21:10:24 +0000

I think they need to make employment laws more lax, allowing employers to “try” out a potential employee without negative consequences if the probationary period doesn’t work out for the employer. The fear of discrimination lawsuits and increased unemployment tax rates, workers compensation claims (and now health care costs) keep companies from hiring people who may have had periods of unemployment or underemployment . That would really open up the field to qualified applicants that are currently excluded from the hiring processes and may be profitable and productive employees if they got the chance.