<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Free Speech Under Attack in Sac	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/28/free-speech-under-attack-in-sac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/28/free-speech-under-attack-in-sac/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: randy		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/28/free-speech-under-attack-in-sac/#comment-16330</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=27192#comment-16330</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[bring back ksac enuff said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bring back ksac enuff said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sue Wilson		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/28/free-speech-under-attack-in-sac/#comment-16329</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sue Wilson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 23:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=27192#comment-16329</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Katy Grimes likes to make a fruit salad out her analysis, mixing apples and oranges and bananas and grapes with whipped cream, so it all looks good but you don&#039;t know what you&#039;re eating.

Sigh.  Where to begin?

First, it is true that I am a former NPR host.  I also have an Emmy for my work at FOX, ferreting out wasteful government spending during the Clinton administration.   Grimes knows that, she just decided not to tell her readers.  (I also have an Emmy for work at CBS in LA and for PBS in Sacramento, to give you the full picture.  Just the facts, ma&#039;am, just the facts.

Grimes then accuses me of working as a shill for the Fairness Doctrine.  Again, she must be aware of the story I broke last summer that the FCC formally buried the Fairness Doctrine.  It&#039;s dead, Katy, gone, buried.  Not one thing I say has anything to do with the Fairness Doctrine, and you know it.  Again, you are purposely confusing your audience;  give them half the facts and it&#039;s so much easier to manipulate them, isn&#039;t it? 

Dum de dum, let&#039;s see, she says I&#039;m not going after Salem Broadcasting.  Wrong.  I am. But Clear Channel is a good starter, as they are the single largest radio operator in the country, and they have five (although they claim six) stations in Sacramento.  

Grimes states that &quot;she,(me) Democrats and the government should be able to dictate just how much conservative radio is broadcast.&quot;  More whipped cream.  The fact is that giant corporations, which are trying to get out of the deal they made with the public, are dictating just how much conservative radio is broadcast. Even though their ratings are plummeting, they hold fast to having conservative - and only conservative - ideas put out over our public airwaves.  Radio and TV.  They belong to all of us.

Then she brings up the biggest lie of them all, the one that William Kristol made up years ago, and went with it because it tested well: &quot;The Liberal agenda already controls the majority of media through television news, newspapers, and news shows.&quot;  

First, Katy, if we look at TV, we&#039;ll see that shows like The Voice and American Idol and Dancing with the Stars and NCIS dominate the schedule.  Where&#039;s the liberalism?  There are a few liberal shows, yes, but not enough to support your argument.  And don&#039;t be calling news shows liberal just because they tell uncomfortable truths.  That&#039;s called journalism.  Second,if you want a conservative newspaper, start one. There&#039;s nothing to stop you. But show me mid-large size a radio station in Sacramento which is available for purchase, and we&#039;ll buy it at appraised price. You can&#039;t; there are none.

To be very clear, Katy Grimes, I do want more speech, not less.  All over the radio and TV dials.  But I personally prefer to make things clear, to say here is an orange and here is an apple, no whipped cream necessary.

Still would LOVE to debate you, Katy.  Do you dare?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katy Grimes likes to make a fruit salad out her analysis, mixing apples and oranges and bananas and grapes with whipped cream, so it all looks good but you don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re eating.</p>
<p>Sigh.  Where to begin?</p>
<p>First, it is true that I am a former NPR host.  I also have an Emmy for my work at FOX, ferreting out wasteful government spending during the Clinton administration.   Grimes knows that, she just decided not to tell her readers.  (I also have an Emmy for work at CBS in LA and for PBS in Sacramento, to give you the full picture.  Just the facts, ma&#8217;am, just the facts.</p>
<p>Grimes then accuses me of working as a shill for the Fairness Doctrine.  Again, she must be aware of the story I broke last summer that the FCC formally buried the Fairness Doctrine.  It&#8217;s dead, Katy, gone, buried.  Not one thing I say has anything to do with the Fairness Doctrine, and you know it.  Again, you are purposely confusing your audience;  give them half the facts and it&#8217;s so much easier to manipulate them, isn&#8217;t it? </p>
<p>Dum de dum, let&#8217;s see, she says I&#8217;m not going after Salem Broadcasting.  Wrong.  I am. But Clear Channel is a good starter, as they are the single largest radio operator in the country, and they have five (although they claim six) stations in Sacramento.  </p>
<p>Grimes states that &#8220;she,(me) Democrats and the government should be able to dictate just how much conservative radio is broadcast.&#8221;  More whipped cream.  The fact is that giant corporations, which are trying to get out of the deal they made with the public, are dictating just how much conservative radio is broadcast. Even though their ratings are plummeting, they hold fast to having conservative &#8211; and only conservative &#8211; ideas put out over our public airwaves.  Radio and TV.  They belong to all of us.</p>
<p>Then she brings up the biggest lie of them all, the one that William Kristol made up years ago, and went with it because it tested well: &#8220;The Liberal agenda already controls the majority of media through television news, newspapers, and news shows.&#8221;  </p>
<p>First, Katy, if we look at TV, we&#8217;ll see that shows like The Voice and American Idol and Dancing with the Stars and NCIS dominate the schedule.  Where&#8217;s the liberalism?  There are a few liberal shows, yes, but not enough to support your argument.  And don&#8217;t be calling news shows liberal just because they tell uncomfortable truths.  That&#8217;s called journalism.  Second,if you want a conservative newspaper, start one. There&#8217;s nothing to stop you. But show me mid-large size a radio station in Sacramento which is available for purchase, and we&#8217;ll buy it at appraised price. You can&#8217;t; there are none.</p>
<p>To be very clear, Katy Grimes, I do want more speech, not less.  All over the radio and TV dials.  But I personally prefer to make things clear, to say here is an orange and here is an apple, no whipped cream necessary.</p>
<p>Still would LOVE to debate you, Katy.  Do you dare?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: queeg		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/28/free-speech-under-attack-in-sac/#comment-16328</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[queeg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=27192#comment-16328</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here we go again...big baddie business...conspiracy.....populist pap!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go again&#8230;big baddie business&#8230;conspiracy&#8230;..populist pap!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rogue Elephant		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/28/free-speech-under-attack-in-sac/#comment-16327</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rogue Elephant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=27192#comment-16327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ah, the totalitarian left!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the totalitarian left!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beelzebub		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/28/free-speech-under-attack-in-sac/#comment-16326</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beelzebub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=27192#comment-16326</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Like most other institutions in America, the media, to include talk radio, is largely bought and paid for by the big special interests. The intricate scams forced upon the masses by both government and Wall Street are never really explained in detail by any form of the american mainstream media. If Brian Williams came on the 6 o&#039;clock news and reported the facts that Matt Taibbi delivers in Rolling Stone Mag, Mr. Williams would be yanked off the air so fast his head would spin in circles. That&#039;s why the average american is so confused and dazed by the events that go on around him. He&#039;s filled with half-truth and outright lies by partisan hacks who are beholden to the ones who hold the purse strings. So there is really no &#039;free speech&#039; in American&#039;s mainstream information delivery system. The TV networks, newspapers and news magazines are packed full of puppets who write and say what they&#039;re told. The conservative vs. liberal stuff is meant to &#039;divide and control&#039; and confuse the peasants. Just as they&#039;ve done with gay vs. straight, female vs. male, religious vs. secular, black vs. white, etc...

If they can coax you to pick a side and join one of the teams - you&#039;ve been gamed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most other institutions in America, the media, to include talk radio, is largely bought and paid for by the big special interests. The intricate scams forced upon the masses by both government and Wall Street are never really explained in detail by any form of the american mainstream media. If Brian Williams came on the 6 o&#8217;clock news and reported the facts that Matt Taibbi delivers in Rolling Stone Mag, Mr. Williams would be yanked off the air so fast his head would spin in circles. That&#8217;s why the average american is so confused and dazed by the events that go on around him. He&#8217;s filled with half-truth and outright lies by partisan hacks who are beholden to the ones who hold the purse strings. So there is really no &#8216;free speech&#8217; in American&#8217;s mainstream information delivery system. The TV networks, newspapers and news magazines are packed full of puppets who write and say what they&#8217;re told. The conservative vs. liberal stuff is meant to &#8216;divide and control&#8217; and confuse the peasants. Just as they&#8217;ve done with gay vs. straight, female vs. male, religious vs. secular, black vs. white, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>If they can coax you to pick a side and join one of the teams &#8211; you&#8217;ve been gamed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David H		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/03/28/free-speech-under-attack-in-sac/#comment-16325</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=27192#comment-16325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not surprising.  Two faced, double-minded, hypocritical, all the names in the book.  Look at the union power for example, can the politicians honestly say that every citizen has the same and equal rights as the unions exercise over others?  Over businesses?  Not that it is a &quot;right&quot;(acutally a wrong) that the unions exercise over others, but you get what I mean.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not surprising.  Two faced, double-minded, hypocritical, all the names in the book.  Look at the union power for example, can the politicians honestly say that every citizen has the same and equal rights as the unions exercise over others?  Over businesses?  Not that it is a &#8220;right&#8221;(acutally a wrong) that the unions exercise over others, but you get what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-14 11:42:32 by W3 Total Cache
-->