I can’t really say much about our wages compared to out-of-state entities because the author didn’t take the time to link to the claim, but it sounds like that’s only compared to other gov’t jobs around the country. I have friends with similar jobs being paid similarly in private sector.

We have not had a cost-of-living increase in 15 years. It isn’t logical to claim that we are over-paid if our salaries have remained the same while the price of everything has inflated. That should lead to the conclusion that state workers were living like kings decades ago, but I don’t remember those stories, do you? My parents and grandparents weren’t driving BMW’s or anything.

And to have the gall to attack the discounts we got when 15% of our check was being taken every month? NEWS FLASH: The furloughs didn’t even help our state; they only attacked a small portion of the populace when taxes could have been raised on all Californians to get actual funds for the state if we were in such dire straits. (Also, come February, I won’t have been able to count on a full paycheck for 4 years.)

I only use my discount on my cell phone. I don’t feel bad about it because cell phone companies in the US are already purposefully gouging everyone and not providing services as advanced as possible. Asian countries already have much faster signals for their phones.

I guess the most important message I could attempt to pass along is that attacking the middle class will only give more power to the corporations and upper class when they will only have to worry about keeping the impoverished from rebelling.

In the State of FL defendants who claim ‘self-defense’ are given an opportunity to prove such at the immunity hearing. And it requires only a preponderence of the evidence. All the evidence I have seen so far in this case (including in the prosecutor’s affidavit for probable cause) points directly to a successful self-defense claim. GZ was walking back to his truck after ending the 911 call when Trayvon confronted him. He never caught up with Trayvon. On the 911 tape GZ was heard saying that Trayvon ran off and he lost sight of him. These are all facts. Of course we saw all the blood on GZ and police reports say he suffered a broken nose. According to the mortician Trayvon had no marks or bruises which indicated that he had been in a fight. A witness told police that Trayvon was on top of GZ straddling him and beating him simultaneously. These are all facts. And there is a better chance than not that they rise to a successful legal defense based on self-defense.

“Most reasonable people will know that gong out and starting a fight while packing heat- which is exactly what Zimmerman did- could lead to a death”

Rex, where is the evidence that GZ ‘started a fight’? I have seen that piece of evidence nowhere. On the contrary, there is ample evidence that Trayvon confronted GZ and start a physical fight. When a man is being beaten up and is in fear of his life or grave bodily injury – and cannot escape (pinned to the ground) according to the law he has a right to use lethal force to stop the perpetrator. ‘Stand your ground’ does not even enter the picture. It is a pure self-defense claim that would fly in most any state.

“If Zimmerman started getting the worst of the fight then he should not have started it….”

Again, no evidence he started it, rex. Trayvon chased GZ down and confronted GZ. GZ had every right to call 911 and report a person who he considered to be ‘suspicious’. That is no crime. It is no crime to try and ascertain the location of that ‘suspicious’ person to report to the police. The crime began once physical force took place. And all the evidence points to Trayvon as the culprit.

Again, I don’t particularly like GZ. And I think he used poor judgment by playing cop. But poor judgment and playing cop are not crimes.

I think this is a political prosecution based on mob rule. And I find that deplorable. That should not happen in the United States of America.

GZ has a sharp attorney. Good chance the case goes bye-bye at the immunity hearing that takes place just prior to the arraignment.

He means well….

There is no immunity, only whether there is proble cause to have a trail, and of course PC is very low compared to guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

I agree with Dershowitz that Zimmerman was over charged, very common DA practice to force a plea deal. Zimmerman will do a plea deal or will go to trial, if he goes to trial I expect a mansalughter conviction.

Most reasonable people will know that gong out and starting a fight while packing heat- which is exactly what Zimmerman did- could lead to a death. If Zimmerman started getting the worst of the fight then he should not have started it, but he was in no danger of death or serious bodily injury against an unarmed tennager with a packet of Skittels, just a good butt whipping, which is what that dork GZ deserved.

He needs to be prosecuted, not 2nd, but manslaughter ofr sure. He needs prison time.

Zimmerman will be convicted of murder in the 3rd and do pirosn time, I guarantee it.

Dang Beelz, it happened again, I responded to Karens comment, before reading yours, and you had made the nearly exact same reply as I did, before I made mine.

We think pretty much the same, this has happened several times now.