<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Calif. blog regulations could hit Drudge, citizen journalists	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/25/calif-blog-regulations-could-hit-drudge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/25/calif-blog-regulations-could-hit-drudge/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 10:20:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: My Homepage		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/25/calif-blog-regulations-could-hit-drudge/#comment-150971</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[My Homepage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 10:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=28019#comment-150971</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;... [Trackback]&lt;/strong&gt;

[...] Find More Informations here: calwatchdog.com/2012/04/25/calif-blog-regulations-could-hit-drudge/ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8230; [Trackback]</strong></p>
<p>[&#8230;] Find More Informations here: calwatchdog.com/2012/04/25/calif-blog-regulations-could-hit-drudge/ [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: FEC Commissioner Uses Russian Meddling As Excuse To Restrict Internet Speech &#8211; Left &#38; Right Wing News		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/25/calif-blog-regulations-could-hit-drudge/#comment-139652</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FEC Commissioner Uses Russian Meddling As Excuse To Restrict Internet Speech &#8211; Left &#38; Right Wing News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 15:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=28019#comment-139652</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] was an inveterate Internet regulator.  She had been pushing greater regulations on bloggers and online speech long before she came to the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] was an inveterate Internet regulator.  She had been pushing greater regulations on bloggers and online speech long before she came to the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Segment 2: Disclosure for Political Bloggers? A Proposal from California. &#171; Cyber Law &#38; Business Report		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/25/calif-blog-regulations-could-hit-drudge/#comment-17431</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Segment 2: Disclosure for Political Bloggers? A Proposal from California. &#171; Cyber Law &#38; Business Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 13:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=28019#comment-17431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Calif. blog regulations could hit Drudge, citizen journalists, Cal Watchdog (April 25, 2012) Ann Ravel, chairwoman of the Fair Political Practices Commission, announced earlier this month her intention to pursue regulations of bloggers that are funded to advocate for or against candidates. “Ultimately I’d like to see the FPPC require it,” Ravel declared at an April 19 campaign finance conference in Sacramento, the Orange County Register reported. After listening to bloggers’ concerns, Ravel now says that that she will be looking for other ways to inform the public about any potentially biased online sources. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Calif. blog regulations could hit Drudge, citizen journalists, Cal Watchdog (April 25, 2012) Ann Ravel, chairwoman of the Fair Political Practices Commission, announced earlier this month her intention to pursue regulations of bloggers that are funded to advocate for or against candidates. “Ultimately I’d like to see the FPPC require it,” Ravel declared at an April 19 campaign finance conference in Sacramento, the Orange County Register reported. After listening to bloggers’ concerns, Ravel now says that that she will be looking for other ways to inform the public about any potentially biased online sources. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Segment 2: Disclosure for Political Bloggers? A Proposal from California. &#171; ILC Cyber Report		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/25/calif-blog-regulations-could-hit-drudge/#comment-17430</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Segment 2: Disclosure for Political Bloggers? A Proposal from California. &#171; ILC Cyber Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 10:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=28019#comment-17430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Calif. blog regulations could hit Drudge, citizen journalists, Cal Watchdog (April 25, 2012) Ann Ravel, chairwoman of the Fair Political Practices Commission, announced earlier this month her intention to pursue regulations of bloggers that are funded to advocate for or against candidates. “Ultimately I’d like to see the FPPC require it,” Ravel declared at an April 19 campaign finance conference in Sacramento, the Orange County Register reported. After listening to bloggers’ concerns, Ravel now says that that she will be looking for other ways to inform the public about any potentially biased online sources. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Calif. blog regulations could hit Drudge, citizen journalists, Cal Watchdog (April 25, 2012) Ann Ravel, chairwoman of the Fair Political Practices Commission, announced earlier this month her intention to pursue regulations of bloggers that are funded to advocate for or against candidates. “Ultimately I’d like to see the FPPC require it,” Ravel declared at an April 19 campaign finance conference in Sacramento, the Orange County Register reported. After listening to bloggers’ concerns, Ravel now says that that she will be looking for other ways to inform the public about any potentially biased online sources. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beelzebub		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/25/calif-blog-regulations-could-hit-drudge/#comment-17429</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beelzebub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 06:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=28019#comment-17429</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Have a great weekend posters….&quot;

Is the circus in town?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Have a great weekend posters….&#8221;</p>
<p>Is the circus in town?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: queeg		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/25/calif-blog-regulations-could-hit-drudge/#comment-17428</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[queeg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=28019#comment-17428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Have a great weekend posters....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a great weekend posters&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beelzebub		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/25/calif-blog-regulations-could-hit-drudge/#comment-17427</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beelzebub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=28019#comment-17427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[INSTRUCTIONS FOR NITWITS:

If you dislike comments from certain posters DON&#039;T READ THEIR POSTS!

Opinion boards are for opinions. That is their sole purpose. If you have a problem with that steer clear of the opinions. 

Your attacks on other posters is not appreciated. And your attacks are definitely out of control.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INSTRUCTIONS FOR NITWITS:</p>
<p>If you dislike comments from certain posters DON&#8217;T READ THEIR POSTS!</p>
<p>Opinion boards are for opinions. That is their sole purpose. If you have a problem with that steer clear of the opinions. </p>
<p>Your attacks on other posters is not appreciated. And your attacks are definitely out of control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: queeg		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/25/calif-blog-regulations-could-hit-drudge/#comment-17426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[queeg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=28019#comment-17426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some bloggers must be exorcized.....the word pollution is out of control......]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some bloggers must be exorcized&#8230;..the word pollution is out of control&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beelzebub		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/25/calif-blog-regulations-could-hit-drudge/#comment-17425</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beelzebub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=28019#comment-17425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t the FPPC the same agency that claimed ex-Assemblyman Michael Duvall from OC did not violate any rules or laws? heh. 

And now they are coming down on bloggers like a 20 lbs sledgehammer?

Circle the wagons and attack the outsiders. Just like I used to see in the old wild west films starring John Wayne and Ronny Reagan.

And the cowboys in the white hats always won.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the FPPC the same agency that claimed ex-Assemblyman Michael Duvall from OC did not violate any rules or laws? heh. </p>
<p>And now they are coming down on bloggers like a 20 lbs sledgehammer?</p>
<p>Circle the wagons and attack the outsiders. Just like I used to see in the old wild west films starring John Wayne and Ronny Reagan.</p>
<p>And the cowboys in the white hats always won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rogue Elephant		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/25/calif-blog-regulations-could-hit-drudge/#comment-17424</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rogue Elephant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=28019#comment-17424</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The California Fair Political Practices Commission’s (FPPC) rumored blogger regulations would face major hurdles. The FPPC is considering imposing campaign disclosure requirements on websites offering paid political ads and/or paid political commentary. The proposed rules would seem unlikely to withstand constitutional challenge for the following reasons:

1) The rules would likely fail either for being overinclusive (by attempting to sweep in all “paid political content” from all sources, including traditional media) or underinclusive (by excluding some “paid political content”, such as traditional media).
2) The rules would likely fail for identity/viewpoint discrimination by including some speakers (alternative media) but not others (traditional media).
3) The rules would likely fail for acting as a prior restraint that chills political speech through a costly enforcement threat that also serves as a weapon against anonymous political dissent.

In the final analysis, the proposed rules appear less an attempt to expand into new media than an attempt to expend into all forms of political expression.

http://roguethinking.wordpress.com/2012/04/26/planned-california-blogger-regulations-face-major-hurdles/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The California Fair Political Practices Commission’s (FPPC) rumored blogger regulations would face major hurdles. The FPPC is considering imposing campaign disclosure requirements on websites offering paid political ads and/or paid political commentary. The proposed rules would seem unlikely to withstand constitutional challenge for the following reasons:</p>
<p>1) The rules would likely fail either for being overinclusive (by attempting to sweep in all “paid political content” from all sources, including traditional media) or underinclusive (by excluding some “paid political content”, such as traditional media).<br />
2) The rules would likely fail for identity/viewpoint discrimination by including some speakers (alternative media) but not others (traditional media).<br />
3) The rules would likely fail for acting as a prior restraint that chills political speech through a costly enforcement threat that also serves as a weapon against anonymous political dissent.</p>
<p>In the final analysis, the proposed rules appear less an attempt to expand into new media than an attempt to expend into all forms of political expression.</p>
<p><a href="http://roguethinking.wordpress.com/2012/04/26/planned-california-blogger-regulations-face-major-hurdles/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://roguethinking.wordpress.com/2012/04/26/planned-california-blogger-regulations-face-major-hurdles/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-09 10:41:36 by W3 Total Cache
-->