Sacramento redevelopment alive and thriving

by CalWatchdog Staff | September 19, 2012 6:02 pm

Sept. 19, 2012

Katy Grimes: All cities go through ebbs and flows of building, development, and restoration of historical buildings. Some cities are much better at general planning, and decisions of restoration and renovation. Saccramento is not one of those.

[1]

After receiving 50,000 applications for the newly restored 1920s vintage Hotel Berry[2], which now features 115 low-income studio apartments, the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency is apparently alive and thriving.

“The building retains original marquees, signs, awnings and roof details, but the $24 million project included extensive seismic upgrades,” reported the Sacramento Business Journal.

Isn’t that special… it should be after SHRA spent $316,000 per unit to renovate the hotel into Section 8 housing.

Hotel Berry

In 2009, the Sacramento City Council authorized the purchase of the old hotel Berry – one of the city’s single room occupancy hotels. SRO hotels were known as the last stop, last resort rooming houses, before one landed on skid row.

But the Hotel Berry wasn’t always a dive. Built in 1929, the Hotel Berry was a happening hotel well into the 1950’s, used by lobbyists and Capitol businessmen. But only a couple of decades later, the hotel was largely a transient flop house.

SHRA

In 1981, the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency[3] came on the scene and began its takeover of many of the city’s old hotels.

In 2007, a non-profit low-income housing developer bought the hotel, and began the massive renovation of turning the former hotel rooms into affordable housing units and ADA accessible units. The developer, AF Evans, applied for Tax Credit Allocation Committee low-income housing bonds, to make the project financially feasible.

But the economy tanked shortly after the purchase, and the bonds could not be sold. After AF Evans tried to hold on to the old hotel, and maintain it, they could not and in swooped the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency, whivh purchased the hotel for $1.

SHRA could not keep the dilapidated hotel open, nor could they justify the $13 million renovation. So they closed the hotel.

By 2011, the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency officials announced that they had joined affordable housing developer Jamboree Housing Corporation in a $25 million project to renovate the Hotel Berry.

According to the redevelopment agency, “SHRA assisted the $25 million project with $9.6 million in redevelopment housing funds and $450,000 in funding from the Mental Health Services Act.  Supportive services will be provided by Transitional Living and Community Support. The project also received a one-time grant award of $13.5 million from the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment  Act through the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee. Other funding includes $5.5 million from U.S. Bank and $500,000 in federal weatherization funds from the Community Resource Project, Inc.”

All of the contractors were highest-cost, union labor.

Can you say, “taxpayer boondoggle?”

But it gets better.

While there is still a glut of condos for sale in Sacramento, our redevelopment agency went ahead and approved taxpayer-funds totalling $316,000 per unit, for low-income housing.

It would have made much more sense for SHRA to have bought up all of the cheap condos for sale, and given them to the entire homeless population and Occupy protestors in Sacramento.

There is also a glut of single residence occupancy, flop house hotels in downtown Sacramento. The folks who live in these hotels drive away business as they wander the K Street Mall throughout the day.

Another boondoggle

[4]

Who could forget the overpriced Maydestone apartments renovation[5] which also cost taxpayers more than $300,000 per unit to renovate?

I am not sure if all 32 employees on the SHRA staff are still employed there enjoying salaries of more than $100,000 per year, or if the agency was downsized when Gov. Jerry Brown decreed the end of redevelopment[6] in California. Pfffft.

The executive staff[7] has not changed at all, and after Sacramento landed the former director of the California Redevelopment Agency, John Shirey[8], as its City Manager, I didn’t expect anything to change in the state Capitol.

But $300,000 renovations for low-income studio apartments is nothing more than government rubbing taxpayers’ faces in the waste, abuse and probably fraud, that clearly is still going on. It pays to be a homeless vagrant in Sacramento.

I am taking bets on how long it will take for these $300,000 renovated units to be trashed. But don’t worry — then they will need more taxpayer renovations. It’s like free money… and another important reason to vote.

Source URL: https://calwatchdog.com/2012/09/19/sacramento-redevelopment-alive-and-thriving/

---