Comments on: The day after the election

By: C.J.

C.J. — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:38:44 +0000

I just want to point out the fraud of Prop.38.
The pro argument is that the money will go into a special fund and will only be spent on “our kids.”
The fact is Californians already know this is a lie – remember the Lotto?
These “special” funds are simply part of a shell game that the pols and robo-crats love to play. Whatever goes into this special fund, they’ll simply deduct other money from maintenance, etc. and nothing will change.
Garbage in, garbage out.

By: Ulysses Uhaul

Ulysses Uhaul — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:31:51 +0000

Yawn….scratch….yawn….roll…..yawn……

By: us citizen

us citizen — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 20:03:04 +0000

Get rid of the illegals.

By: Rex the Wonder Dog!

Rex the Wonder Dog! — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:25:43 +0000

Did he roll with the people when he put the state prison system into Federal receivership because the inmates didn’t get gold plated health care? Don’t think so.
You have no idea what you’re speaking of, NO INAMTE has “gold plated” health care- in fact health care was essentially non existent for many prisoners, Henderson and ANOTHER judge both stepped in and forced a fix after the state was violating constitutionally protected rights. I WANT a judge up there who will protect constitutionally protected rights, not some right wing nut like Clarence Thomas who sides with the gov on over 95% of their cases…..

By: Rex the Wonder Dog!

Rex the Wonder Dog! — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:22:55 +0000

One ruling does not make one a “legal hack”.

“On 2 August 2010, the Supreme Court of the state of California found for the second time that Proposition 209 was constitutional The ruling, by a 6-1 majority, followed an earlier unanimous affirmation of the constitutionality of Prop. 209 by the same court. On 2 April 2012, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the latest challenge to Proposition 209. The three-judge panel concluded that it was bound by a 9th Circuit ruling in 1997 upholding the constitutionality of the affirmative action ban.”

By: Dyspeptic

Dyspeptic — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:52:39 +0000

“Thelton Henderson is a very respected judge, and as a federal judge he would not hear any lawsuit over Prop 32, only a state court judge would. But if he did he would roll with the people, not the scammers.”

Sure Rex, he is respected by his left wing fellow travelers. They put him there after all. A brief review of his bio. shows that he is the epitome of a left wing judicial hack. Law degree from U.C. Berzerkley, U.S. “Justice” Dept. civil rights lawyer, Legal Aid Society honcho, has a center for “social justice” named after him at Boalt Hall and he was appointed to the Federal bench by none other than Jimmie “Goober” Carter. I’m sure Eric Holder, Barack Obama and Hugo Chavez think the world of him.

Did he roll with the people when he struck down Prop. 209? Don’t think so.

Did he roll with the people when he put the state prison system into Federal receivership because the inmates didn’t get gold plated healthcare? Don’t think so.

Did he roll with the people when he overturned the conviction of a racist, murdering, Marxist Black Panther thug like Johnny Spain? Don’t think so.

You may admire him Rex, but the man is a stone cold race hustler, poverty pimp and left wing ideologue. Jimmy Carter wouldn’t have it any other way.

By: Rex the Wonder Dog!

Rex the Wonder Dog! — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:10:13 +0000

Hondo- the 9th Circuit would not hear a Prop 32 case. And the fact is the 9th Circuit is run by a right wing demagogue idiot named Alex Kozincski. Today half the 9th are extremist right wingers.

By: Rex the Wonder Dog!

Rex the Wonder Dog! — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:08:14 +0000

Thelton Henderson is a very respected judge, and as a federal judge he would not hear any lawsuit over Prop 32, only a state court judge would. But if he did he would roll with the people, not the scammers.

By: Hondo

Hondo — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:01:24 +0000

I agree with Dyspeptic here. Even if prop 32 passes, you can bet of the 9th circut throwing it out. And then wait years for the supremes to vote on it. We can count on Roberts can’t we?
Hondo….

By: Dyspeptic

Dyspeptic — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:46:22 +0000

“However, if Prop. 32 passes, California voters and taxpayers just might get the ear of the Democrats.”

Dream on Katy.

If Prop. 32 passes you can expect a flurry of union lawsuits, Wisconsin style demonstrations by labor cartel thugs and much conniving and duplicity from Demogoguecrat politicians. You can also expect state and municipal officials to violate the provisions of Prop. 32 for years to come, until the courts have the final say. These people have no respect for the law or the will of the people. They are utterly ruthless ideologues.

I guarantee the unions will go judge shopping and find some odious partisan legal hack like Thelton Henderson who will declare Prop. 32 to be a violation of every provision of the U.S. Constitution, The Magna Carta, The United Nations Charter, The Holy Bible, The Koran, The Talmud, etc. etc. Before you can say “shit howdy” some left wing hack Federal judge will slap a “temporary” injunction on Prop. 32. in the name of social justice. It could be years before the dust settles on all this.

Remember, our Socialist Overlords never give up and they never play by the rules. To them, all is fair in politics as long as you win in the end.