Comments on: Partisanship evidence of how much at stake in election https://calwatchdog.com/2012/11/06/partisanship-evidence-of-how-much-at-stake-in-election/ Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:50:06 +0000 hourly 1 By: SeeSaw https://calwatchdog.com/2012/11/06/partisanship-evidence-of-how-much-at-stake-in-election/#comment-28030 Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:50:06 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=34284#comment-28030 The list of those opposing prop. 32 is made up of working people–middle class working people! Those sponsoring prop. 32 are the rich corporations and rich individual donors like the Mungers and the out-of-state Koch Bros. There is a big difference there! The LA Times Columnist wrote, “The perpetrators of this prop. think you are stupid–really stupid. Well that’s just what you all are! Stupid!

]]> By: Bob https://calwatchdog.com/2012/11/06/partisanship-evidence-of-how-much-at-stake-in-election/#comment-28029 Wed, 07 Nov 2012 02:43:27 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=34284#comment-28029 Well, it’s 6:39 and Romney just lost WI, NH and PA so I think he’s pretty much toast.

Pretty bad sign when Romney’s VP nominee couldn’t even help him carry WI.

]]> By: Bob https://calwatchdog.com/2012/11/06/partisanship-evidence-of-how-much-at-stake-in-election/#comment-28028 Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:09:03 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=34284#comment-28028 Dang, early results show Borg Obama beating the Romulan in Florida, Ohio and even North Carolina. For the Romulan resistance may be futile.

]]> By: Bob https://calwatchdog.com/2012/11/06/partisanship-evidence-of-how-much-at-stake-in-election/#comment-28027 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:50:36 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=34284#comment-28027 And tonight feels a lot more like Halloween than an election night.

Except it’s not a good Halloween. It’s the type where you know you get no treats and hope the tricks won’t be too nasty.

With each election all we can hope for is that things don’t get worse than they already are. That is the best we can do.

]]> By: Bob https://calwatchdog.com/2012/11/06/partisanship-evidence-of-how-much-at-stake-in-election/#comment-28026 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:30:03 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=34284#comment-28026 >25 to votes

Should be 25 to 30 votes

]]> By: Bob https://calwatchdog.com/2012/11/06/partisanship-evidence-of-how-much-at-stake-in-election/#comment-28025 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:29:32 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=34284#comment-28025 The polls have not yet closed back East so no election results or exit polls have been released.

So here are my predictions:

Obammie wins in the Electoral College by 25 to votes, but the popular vote will be closer. The Romulan loses tht by maybe 3 to 4%. And the results will be known by the end of tonight.

The House and Senate stay pretty much the same as they are now.

In Colliefornia 38 gets wiped out and 30 loses but it will be very close and we might not know for a couple of days.

The DemoNcrats may pick up a seat in the legislature but they don’t get 2/3rds majority.

]]> By: TJ https://calwatchdog.com/2012/11/06/partisanship-evidence-of-how-much-at-stake-in-election/#comment-28024 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 22:27:20 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=34284#comment-28024 I have to appreciate the irony that the union robbed my paycheck to finance “No on 32” – yet my vote will be Yes. And in the end, that’s all that counts.

]]> By: » Partisanship evidence of how much at stake in election | CalWatchDog https://calwatchdog.com/2012/11/06/partisanship-evidence-of-how-much-at-stake-in-election/#comment-28023 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 22:16:04 +0000 http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=34284#comment-28023 […] Partisanship evidence of how much at stake in election | CalWatchDog Go to this article […]

]]>