Comments on: Election losers still win big

By: SactoSilly

SactoSilly — Wed, 05 Dec 2012 08:19:41 +0000

This is a great piece. Love the “Trading Places” references at the end. And, if this is why Team Romney really thinks they lost, we were in more trouble than I thought!

By: Rex the Wonder Dog!

Rex the Wonder Dog! — Tue, 04 Dec 2012 07:54:47 +0000

95% of all of Obama’s adds were negative. He had no record to run on. His only chance was to trash Romney

Hondo- Mike Dukakis was destroying GWB in 1987, had a 17 point lead, and then Bush ran the Willie Horton ads…. Dukakis did NLOT respond (huge mistake-which Clinton did NOT make) and the rest is history. After that negative ads were the norm, and always will be, for both parties.

By: Hondo

Hondo — Tue, 04 Dec 2012 03:22:26 +0000

95% of all of Obama’s adds were negative. He had no record to run on. His only chance was to trash Romney. That would only work if Romney was a wimp and refused to defend him self and to treat Obama with kid gloves.
The race for the president is more like a hockey game and you better be ready to catch some elbows and through a few yourselves. Romney came with his badminton team and got bitch slapped all over the country. Obamacare was never talked about. It has the biggest tax increase on the middle class in Amerika’s history and Romney never talked about it.
I almost believe Romney was paid to throw the election. There is no possible way to run a worse campaign than he did.
Like I said. The reason Obama ran 95% of his adds negative is because he did a bad job and he knew it. He was easily beatable. If you didn’t mind playing hockey.
Hondo……….

By: Rex the Wonder Dog!

Rex the Wonder Dog! — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:16:41 +0000

Comes and goes in cycles….. I remember when Dems could not win the presidency if their life depended on t, from Nixon to Bush 1 only Jimmy Carter got in a short 4 years, a 24 year run of Repugs with only Carter for 4 years in between…then came Clinton, then Bush, now Obama, and in 2016 who knows, but one thing is for sure, it will be cyclical.

By: Paul

Paul — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 05:14:12 +0000

I believe Obama felt confident going into the election he would easily win but became doubtful after the first debate. He obviously won by a large margin but for all the wrong reason. America is in trouble and sadly, this administration is clueless in how to build the economy, jobs etc…. Expect more hard times folks. We are all in the shitter now.

By: Left of Rio Linda

Left of Rio Linda — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 01:00:31 +0000

Because the Republican party has become a party of “PC” candy asses.

By: Charles Nichols

Charles Nichols — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 23:09:57 +0000

If the current percentages hold, Romney will have received a smaller percentage of the vote for President than did Herbert Hoover.

Romney joins a long list of losing RINOs. Time to stop listening to the pundits and start nominating conservatives.