Comments on: Sen. Lou Correa attacks free-speech rights

By: SeeSaw

SeeSaw — Fri, 07 Dec 2012 03:46:47 +0000

Your city must be a little backward. Most entities use professional auditors to conduct the financial revues.

By: Donkey

Donkey — Fri, 07 Dec 2012 01:13:25 +0000

SeeSaw, I owned my own business, and I have had many dealings with irrational RAGWUS feeders over the years looking for nothing but cash for doing said business in the fat bureaucrats home city. I have also spent time on the financial review commitee(FRC)of my city, which opened my eyes to the depravity of the typical RAGWUS operative.

It is in this setting, as a member of the FRC that I was enlighted to the dealings of the RAGWUS and their intent to steal the wealth from the private sector for their own financial gain, leaving as little as possible for the private sector workers.

One does not have to be a part of the RAGWUS feeding frenzy to knhow of its evil my dear!! 🙂

By: SeeSaw

SeeSaw — Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:45:32 +0000

Have you ever been a public sector employee, Donk? Just wondering–you must have been one for quite some time, since you claim to know enough to qualify you to verbally assault public employees, 24/7.

By: SeeSaw

SeeSaw — Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:35:22 +0000

No lies at all there, Donk. Look it up. I am a taxpayer and I don’t steal from others. My religious upbringing was Catholic–I am Baptized and Confirmed–so I am qualified to speak on issues regarding that Religious Order.

By: Donkey

Donkey — Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:06:18 +0000

Unlike the RAGWUS,from which you feed, people that gather at private sector groups seek rational and logical results to the world around themselves, unlike the world of government.

In typical fashion of a Marxist you lie in post #4 and then in post #7, after I called you out, you try to cover your lie with a generalization. This is no surprise to me SeeSaw, knowing from what you write you have no scruples stealing from the taxpayers, thus your assult on entire groups to which you have no affiliation.
😉
🙂

By: SeeSaw

SeeSaw — Thu, 06 Dec 2012 01:50:42 +0000

Under the guidance of, and at their direcions to their respective members–doubt you can know for sure that they did not contribute from the coffers.

By: Donkey

Donkey — Thu, 06 Dec 2012 01:31:43 +0000

SeeSaw, the Catholic and Mormon churches did not spend a dime on prop 8. The members of these organizations and many others organized, walked, and contributed to the victory of prop 8 as individuals. 😉

By: Rex the Wonder Dog!

Rex the Wonder Dog! — Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:58:58 +0000

SeeSaw says:
The Supreme Court’s Citizen United case has made a mockery of the process.

It is a niracle, the stars have aligned, seesaw made her first decent and intelligent comment!

Right now seeesaw!

By: SeeSaw

SeeSaw — Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:55:52 +0000

McCain and Finegold tried to reform campaign contribution laws, with no success. The Supreme Court’s Citizen United case has made a mockery of the process. The question surrounding the “Dark Money” issue was, when I first read about it, one related to possible illegal money laundering. I thought that the AG’s office was going to look into that. If the people behind the, “Dark Money” can be legally outed, I am with Correa. We found out that the Mormon and Catholic churches were spending heavily to pass Prop.8–we ought to know who was against the people of CA with Props. 30 and 32. Fortunately, the right side won.

What Hillary Clinton did in NY was legal according to the laws of NY–same process that was used in NY by Robert Kennedy.

By: Dyspeptic

Dyspeptic — Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:44:38 +0000

Self interested bureaucrats conspiring with politico’s to expand their regulatory purview – I’m sure only good things will come from that. Hey those carpetbaggers in Arizona deserve it, right? We all know carpetbagging is evil, except when Democrats like Hillary Clinton do it to get a Senate seat, then it’s OK. We need double standards in politics because consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.