Comments on: Nanny staters’ school lunch debacle, chapter 237

By: eyeamok

eyeamok — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:15:39 +0000

Has anybody ever considered that maybe it should be the parents responsibility to FEED THEIR OWN CHILDREN, why should I pay for your child’s nutrition. That is your job. personally all these children with parents too lazy or too inept to properly care for them should have all their kids put into foster care.

By: jimmydeeoc

jimmydeeoc — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:40:47 +0000

Ohh… don’t forget the Michelle food plan is far more expensive than the original.

But it’s for the children!

More expensive food, yet at the same time more waste.

Happy rats, at least.

Unless, of course, the food goes down the disposal. In which case the Flood Control District will sue the School District for the added organics in wastewater stream.

By: jimmydeeoc

jimmydeeoc — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:35:25 +0000

A perfect example of Nanny State government failing once again in its Utopian quest.

Reasonably nutritious food is outlawed…..replaced with Michelle-approved food no one touches….which leads to kids eating MORE junk food than they otherwise would have.

Democrats still a little fuzzy on that “Law of Unintended Consequences” thing, I see.

How many more decades until they learn the lesson?

By: Hondo

Hondo — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:27:20 +0000

Amerika voted to starve it’s kids.
What a country.
Hondo….