<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Calif. economy: Ya sure, you betcha, we&#8217;re fine!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2012/12/10/ya-sure-you-betcha-were-fine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/12/10/ya-sure-you-betcha-were-fine/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Marten purdy		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/12/10/ya-sure-you-betcha-were-fine/#comment-29723</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marten purdy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=35401#comment-29723</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney
This guy is not only incompetitent, he&#039;s the biggest flip-flopper in politics. And this doesn&#039;t mean his position &quot;evolves&quot; over time or as the situation changes. Mitten&#039;s position changes depending on which state he happens to be in at the time. No nuance about this guy. He&#039;s one of those &quot;dazzle them with bullshit&quot; kind of politicians, about as cardboard and phony as you will find in politics.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney<br />
This guy is not only incompetitent, he&#8217;s the biggest flip-flopper in politics. And this doesn&#8217;t mean his position &#8220;evolves&#8221; over time or as the situation changes. Mitten&#8217;s position changes depending on which state he happens to be in at the time. No nuance about this guy. He&#8217;s one of those &#8220;dazzle them with bullshit&#8221; kind of politicians, about as cardboard and phony as you will find in politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jimmydeeoc		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/12/10/ya-sure-you-betcha-were-fine/#comment-29722</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmydeeoc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=35401#comment-29722</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, see saw, you COULD have implemented a good portion of Simpson-Bowles for starters.

Unfortunately, as you recall, your &quot;President&quot; immediately unzipped his drawers and loafed on it.

Legislators are now trying to sweep away the dried fecal matter from its pages and trying to figure out how much of it The One might countenance.....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, see saw, you COULD have implemented a good portion of Simpson-Bowles for starters.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, as you recall, your &#8220;President&#8221; immediately unzipped his drawers and loafed on it.</p>
<p>Legislators are now trying to sweep away the dried fecal matter from its pages and trying to figure out how much of it The One might countenance&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SeeSaw		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/12/10/ya-sure-you-betcha-were-fine/#comment-29721</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SeeSaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=35401#comment-29721</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why don&#039;t you outline what you consider a good policy and tell us why it would work, JD. Tell us how to get those 25,000,000 people back to work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you outline what you consider a good policy and tell us why it would work, JD. Tell us how to get those 25,000,000 people back to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jimmydeeoc		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/12/10/ya-sure-you-betcha-were-fine/#comment-29720</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmydeeoc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=35401#comment-29720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Steve from Sacto.....

Why not provide the original link to the tripe you cut &#039;n posted?

Moreover, you are making the mistake I see many Democrat pundits making as of late.  The argument goes like this:  &quot;Well, polling shows that a majority of people think it&#039;s a good idea to &quot;tax the rich&quot; and they support the President.&quot; Therefore, the thinking goes, President Pander should proceed.

News for you, Stev-o....just because something polls well doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s good policy.  

And what if those dour Republicans actually ARE right?  What then?  Clutch those unicorns and moonbeams ever tighter?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve from Sacto&#8230;..</p>
<p>Why not provide the original link to the tripe you cut &#8216;n posted?</p>
<p>Moreover, you are making the mistake I see many Democrat pundits making as of late.  The argument goes like this:  &#8220;Well, polling shows that a majority of people think it&#8217;s a good idea to &#8220;tax the rich&#8221; and they support the President.&#8221; Therefore, the thinking goes, President Pander should proceed.</p>
<p>News for you, Stev-o&#8230;.just because something polls well doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s good policy.  </p>
<p>And what if those dour Republicans actually ARE right?  What then?  Clutch those unicorns and moonbeams ever tighter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SeeSaw		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/12/10/ya-sure-you-betcha-were-fine/#comment-29719</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SeeSaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=35401#comment-29719</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Its not when and where you earn the money, Rex.  Its when and where you are when you receive it--the Federal Government and Clinton saw to that.  I personally believe that retirees who earned the money here, and leave the state, should pay state income taxes here.  But, you can&#039;t over-ride federal law.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not when and where you earn the money, Rex.  Its when and where you are when you receive it&#8211;the Federal Government and Clinton saw to that.  I personally believe that retirees who earned the money here, and leave the state, should pay state income taxes here.  But, you can&#8217;t over-ride federal law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SeeSaw		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/12/10/ya-sure-you-betcha-were-fine/#comment-29718</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SeeSaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=35401#comment-29718</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I live in California, Tax Target--and very proudly!  Enjoy yourself in that Red-neck place you are going to.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in California, Tax Target&#8211;and very proudly!  Enjoy yourself in that Red-neck place you are going to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: stevefromsacto		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/12/10/ya-sure-you-betcha-were-fine/#comment-29717</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stevefromsacto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=35401#comment-29717</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting column providing another reason for the growing irrelevance of the rabid right:

&quot;From Franklin Roosevelt&#039;s advice that the only thing Americans once had to fear &quot;was fear itself,&quot; to Ronald Reagan&#039;s &quot;morning in America&quot; theme, to Bill Clinton&#039;s &quot;the man from Hope,&quot; to Barack Obama&#039;s &quot;hope and change,&quot; the overarching theme of American political campaigns has long been the triumph of hope over fear.

&quot;With that in mind, last week&#039;s Public Policy Institute of California&#039;s statewide survey of Californians offered some interesting insight as to why Republicans may have fared so poorly in this state in last month&#039;s elections. The party these days has what might be called a hope deficit.....no one wins elections by being dour.

&quot;Perhaps the most revealing question asked in the PPIC poll was one that gauged Californians&#039; long-term views about the future of their state. Asked whether they felt California would be a better place to live in 2025 or a worse place to live, 42 percent of adults gave the optimistic answer, compared with 28 percent who said it would be a worse place. An additional 23 percent said there would be no change, and 8 percent offered no opinion.

&quot;By gender, by race and ethnicity, by region, by age group, by income category -- in every subgroup either a plurality of respondents felt better times are ahead for California or opinion was at least evenly divided. Women (44 percent), Latinos (47 percent), San Francisco Bay Area residents (45 percent), 18-34-year-olds (48 percent) and those with incomes between $40,000 and $80,000 a year (46 percent) were the most optimistic. Opinion among whites (37-37), those 55 and older (36-35) and with incomes above $80,000 (35-34) was divided.

&quot;But there was one breakdown by subgroup that showed a marked divide on the hope factor. By a 57-17 margin, Democrats felt California will be a better place a dozen years from now. Republicans, by a margin of 54-23, believe the state is headed downhill.&quot;

Keep it up, Katy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting column providing another reason for the growing irrelevance of the rabid right:</p>
<p>&#8220;From Franklin Roosevelt&#8217;s advice that the only thing Americans once had to fear &#8220;was fear itself,&#8221; to Ronald Reagan&#8217;s &#8220;morning in America&#8221; theme, to Bill Clinton&#8217;s &#8220;the man from Hope,&#8221; to Barack Obama&#8217;s &#8220;hope and change,&#8221; the overarching theme of American political campaigns has long been the triumph of hope over fear.</p>
<p>&#8220;With that in mind, last week&#8217;s Public Policy Institute of California&#8217;s statewide survey of Californians offered some interesting insight as to why Republicans may have fared so poorly in this state in last month&#8217;s elections. The party these days has what might be called a hope deficit&#8230;..no one wins elections by being dour.</p>
<p>&#8220;Perhaps the most revealing question asked in the PPIC poll was one that gauged Californians&#8217; long-term views about the future of their state. Asked whether they felt California would be a better place to live in 2025 or a worse place to live, 42 percent of adults gave the optimistic answer, compared with 28 percent who said it would be a worse place. An additional 23 percent said there would be no change, and 8 percent offered no opinion.</p>
<p>&#8220;By gender, by race and ethnicity, by region, by age group, by income category &#8212; in every subgroup either a plurality of respondents felt better times are ahead for California or opinion was at least evenly divided. Women (44 percent), Latinos (47 percent), San Francisco Bay Area residents (45 percent), 18-34-year-olds (48 percent) and those with incomes between $40,000 and $80,000 a year (46 percent) were the most optimistic. Opinion among whites (37-37), those 55 and older (36-35) and with incomes above $80,000 (35-34) was divided.</p>
<p>&#8220;But there was one breakdown by subgroup that showed a marked divide on the hope factor. By a 57-17 margin, Democrats felt California will be a better place a dozen years from now. Republicans, by a margin of 54-23, believe the state is headed downhill.&#8221;</p>
<p>Keep it up, Katy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rex the Wonder Dog!		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/12/10/ya-sure-you-betcha-were-fine/#comment-29716</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex the Wonder Dog!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=35401#comment-29716</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NTHEOC-I have a serious question for you. 

Since pensions are considered deferred compensation, would that mean the salary/pension earned in retirement is subject to CA income taxes, as it is compensation paid from here- CA, here for work here-CA, that was only deferred????]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NTHEOC-I have a serious question for you. </p>
<p>Since pensions are considered deferred compensation, would that mean the salary/pension earned in retirement is subject to CA income taxes, as it is compensation paid from here- CA, here for work here-CA, that was only deferred????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rex the Wonder Dog!		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/12/10/ya-sure-you-betcha-were-fine/#comment-29715</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex the Wonder Dog!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=35401#comment-29715</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Sean Morham says:

My projections: state will have $5.5 billion deficit for next year. After that, my projections are back to $10 billion plus yearly.
&lt;/b&gt;
Ill second Sean&#039;s prediction and add that in 4 years the &quot;temporary&quot; tax hikes will not be able to sunset b/c there is not enough revenue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Sean Morham says:</p>
<p>My projections: state will have $5.5 billion deficit for next year. After that, my projections are back to $10 billion plus yearly.<br />
</b><br />
Ill second Sean&#8217;s prediction and add that in 4 years the &#8220;temporary&#8221; tax hikes will not be able to sunset b/c there is not enough revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rex the Wonder Dog!		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/12/10/ya-sure-you-betcha-were-fine/#comment-29714</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex the Wonder Dog!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=35401#comment-29714</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Steve from Sacto says:

If you think that California’s climbing out of the recession and making economic progress...&lt;/b&gt;


Climbing out of depression?? Our state revenues from taxes has been almost the same for the last 5 years- going on 6 years- when this depression started....Stevie, you say this every year, you and seesaw, that the state is improving, it is not, it has been stagnant at BEST.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Steve from Sacto says:</p>
<p>If you think that California’s climbing out of the recession and making economic progress&#8230;</b></p>
<p>Climbing out of depression?? Our state revenues from taxes has been almost the same for the last 5 years- going on 6 years- when this depression started&#8230;.Stevie, you say this every year, you and seesaw, that the state is improving, it is not, it has been stagnant at BEST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-19 11:02:50 by W3 Total Cache
-->