<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: State Senate Democrats Crack Down on Fracking	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2013/01/18/state-senate-democrats-crack-down-on-fracking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/01/18/state-senate-democrats-crack-down-on-fracking/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:56:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/01/18/state-senate-democrats-crack-down-on-fracking/#comment-6903</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=36798#comment-6903</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Congrats on some very good reporting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on some very good reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave Roberts		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/01/18/state-senate-democrats-crack-down-on-fracking/#comment-6902</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Roberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=36798#comment-6902</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Daniel,
The info on the more than three-decade safety record of hydraulic fracturing in California came from the Dept of Conservation fracking website: http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dog/general_information/Pages/HydraulicFracturing.aspx

It states: &quot;In California, hydraulic fracturing has been used as a production stimulation method for more than 30 years with no reported damage to the environment.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,<br />
The info on the more than three-decade safety record of hydraulic fracturing in California came from the Dept of Conservation fracking website: <a href="http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dog/general_information/Pages/HydraulicFracturing.aspx" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dog/general_information/Pages/HydraulicFracturing.aspx</a></p>
<p>It states: &#8220;In California, hydraulic fracturing has been used as a production stimulation method for more than 30 years with no reported damage to the environment.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hondo		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/01/18/state-senate-democrats-crack-down-on-fracking/#comment-6901</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hondo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 04:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=36798#comment-6901</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here is a way for Kali to balance their budget and to help solve the pension wall of debt.  Fracking has a long history of use and safety.  A win win win solution that is cast aside by the dems.
Hondo...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a way for Kali to balance their budget and to help solve the pension wall of debt.  Fracking has a long history of use and safety.  A win win win solution that is cast aside by the dems.<br />
Hondo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BobA		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/01/18/state-senate-democrats-crack-down-on-fracking/#comment-6900</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BobA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 07:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=36798#comment-6900</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jeannie:

At that price, you&#039;re talking about $6/gal for the winter blend gasoline and $8/gal for the summer blend. Of course uncle &quot;Scam&quot; will want a piece of the action so tack on another dime or two to the overall price.

Here&#039;s the likely result over time, as I see it, for people who can afford to leave: a mass exodus from the state of California as those higher fuel prices spreads throughout every part of California&#039;s economy and gets passed on to the consumer. People will drastically reduce their spending as a result which will send California into a serious and prolonged recession. That portends certain economic disaster for the state of California.

The state government will have little choice but to continue raising taxes to make up for the lost tax revenue as more and more businesses exit California for a friendlier tax environment and taking their jobs along with them. This will also further decimate an already shrinking middle class causing the state&#039;s unemployment rate to soar to heights probably not seen since the last great depression. And as a result, those without the means to leave the state will very likely end up on the welfare rolls and thus further exacerbating the state&#039;s already woeful financial situation.
 
Bottom line: slapping a $3 dollar tax on any new sources of fuel will only result in a death sentence for California.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeannie:</p>
<p>At that price, you&#8217;re talking about $6/gal for the winter blend gasoline and $8/gal for the summer blend. Of course uncle &#8220;Scam&#8221; will want a piece of the action so tack on another dime or two to the overall price.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the likely result over time, as I see it, for people who can afford to leave: a mass exodus from the state of California as those higher fuel prices spreads throughout every part of California&#8217;s economy and gets passed on to the consumer. People will drastically reduce their spending as a result which will send California into a serious and prolonged recession. That portends certain economic disaster for the state of California.</p>
<p>The state government will have little choice but to continue raising taxes to make up for the lost tax revenue as more and more businesses exit California for a friendlier tax environment and taking their jobs along with them. This will also further decimate an already shrinking middle class causing the state&#8217;s unemployment rate to soar to heights probably not seen since the last great depression. And as a result, those without the means to leave the state will very likely end up on the welfare rolls and thus further exacerbating the state&#8217;s already woeful financial situation.</p>
<p>Bottom line: slapping a $3 dollar tax on any new sources of fuel will only result in a death sentence for California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: daniel		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/01/18/state-senate-democrats-crack-down-on-fracking/#comment-6899</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 03:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=36798#comment-6899</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can Mr. Roberts provide his source for the 30 year safety record of fracking?  According to an article in examiner and one in high country news fred starrh an almond grower in bakersfield was awarded $8.5 million because Aera didnt line their ponds.  The other complaint is that the oil industry is largely unmonitored but highly regulated and the industry ignores the regs because few inspectors are around.  Which is right, if either?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can Mr. Roberts provide his source for the 30 year safety record of fracking?  According to an article in examiner and one in high country news fred starrh an almond grower in bakersfield was awarded $8.5 million because Aera didnt line their ponds.  The other complaint is that the oil industry is largely unmonitored but highly regulated and the industry ignores the regs because few inspectors are around.  Which is right, if either?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeannie		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/01/18/state-senate-democrats-crack-down-on-fracking/#comment-6898</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeannie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=36798#comment-6898</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am totally against more taxation, but if they added a $3 a barrel tax, I would bet (cautiously) the Dems would start allowing more drilling.  More and more people I talk to are talking about leaving the state.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am totally against more taxation, but if they added a $3 a barrel tax, I would bet (cautiously) the Dems would start allowing more drilling.  More and more people I talk to are talking about leaving the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Laer Pearce		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/01/18/state-senate-democrats-crack-down-on-fracking/#comment-6897</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laer Pearce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=36798#comment-6897</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Last Tuesday in Newport Beach, WSJ editorial writer Steven Moore told a PRI/Lincoln Club luncheon about the impacts of fracking legislation.  New York has banned the practice. Pennsylvania hasn&#039;t. So Pennsylvania oil producers routinely &quot;dip their straw in New York&#039;s milkshake,&quot; fracking away to extract oil from the rich shale deposits. It would take one long straw to pull this trick on California, but the trick the legislature is considering is crueler by far. With fracking hyper-regulation, California will produce even less fuel, making energy costs even higher. North Dakota, which allows fracking, just passed California to become the nation&#039;s #1 energy producer. How much further down this critical ranking does the legislature want to push us?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Tuesday in Newport Beach, WSJ editorial writer Steven Moore told a PRI/Lincoln Club luncheon about the impacts of fracking legislation.  New York has banned the practice. Pennsylvania hasn&#8217;t. So Pennsylvania oil producers routinely &#8220;dip their straw in New York&#8217;s milkshake,&#8221; fracking away to extract oil from the rich shale deposits. It would take one long straw to pull this trick on California, but the trick the legislature is considering is crueler by far. With fracking hyper-regulation, California will produce even less fuel, making energy costs even higher. North Dakota, which allows fracking, just passed California to become the nation&#8217;s #1 energy producer. How much further down this critical ranking does the legislature want to push us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-15 10:04:19 by W3 Total Cache
-->