Comments on: Assemblyman Donnelly proposes school marshall plan

By: ern

ern — Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:20:58 +0000

This is why we have paid police officers…. Lets put officers in our schools and leave the teaching to the teachers and the policing to the police…

By: Hondo

Hondo — Mon, 21 Jan 2013 01:04:57 +0000

If you are going to keep these schools a weapon free kill zone, at least home school your kids.
There are hundreds of thousands of former military men and women who would volunteer to protect their kids, to stand armed at every school.
The guns are out there. The biggest supporters of the gun bans are the criminals. That’s because law abiding people like me will get rid of the 15 round clips if they are made illegal. The criminals could care less if another 20 years in prison is tacked on to a 100 years sentence for having an illegal clip in addition to killing someone.
We need someone with guns to protect the kids if they are going to public school.
I support online home schooling as much as possible. Don’t send your kids to those union infested free kill zones.
Hondo….

By: Rex the Wonder Dog!

Rex the Wonder Dog! — Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:40:39 +0000

threat…what makes the claim that you should be allowed to own an assault rifle more rational than the argument that you should be allowed to own a stinger surface to air missile, a tow anti-armor rocket, or any other modern military grade combat effective arms? LOL, Arming teachers with guns? What a moronic idea!!!
==
LOL…these items are not “arms” they are military weapons ntheoc.

I agree arming teachers is nuts, they would shoot themselves, or the kids, before they ever hit a bad guy 😉

By: NTHEOC

NTHEOC — Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:29:24 +0000

and more difficult for law-abiding citizens to exercise their Second Amendment right.
=====================
Oh here we go again with this 2nd Amendment crud! These are such weak arguments that allude to some special interpretation of the second amendment that ask us to ignore the current reality about arms regulation, and the historical context of the amendment itself.So what exactly gives you the right to own a weapon that is designed specifically for the military in combat situations…or mass murder in any other situation that is not combat? If you argue the second amendment, then why does that not apply to all military grade weapons!If you are not entering into a designated combat zone, and you are not volunteering to defend our nation against a military threat…what makes the claim that you should be allowed to own an assault rifle more rational than the argument that you should be allowed to own a stinger surface to air missile, a tow anti-armor rocket, or any other modern military grade combat effective arms? LOL, Arming teachers with guns? What a moronic idea!!!

By: SeeSaw

SeeSaw — Sun, 20 Jan 2013 05:33:57 +0000

Air Marshalls on airplanes are specially trained people, for a specific purpose. Arming certain teachers, would be no different than arming certain flight attendants. Bad idea.