by CalWatchdog Staff | January 20, 2013 6:45 am
Jan. 18, 2013
By Chris Reed
That California is extraordinarily hostile to business is accepted as a given by just about everyone who is an executive, manager or small-business owner in the state. But Democrats and some in the media routinely challenge this assumption, and some genuinely seem to believe it’s nothing but a talking point used by business interests to gain undeserved favor.
I once saw a labor official even suggest there was something sinister or rigged about the CEO survey that comes out every year and always ranks the Golden State last in business-friendliness, as if there was a national conspiracy to put California down.
To a degree, Gov. Jerry Brown seems to believe that the business community’s gripes have some merit. So he’s taken to criticizing excessive regulation and to urging bureaucrats to help, not hinder, job creation.
Brown now faces an acid test for his alleged interest in helping the private sector: an insanely capricious and destructive decision by the state’s Franchise Tax Board to impose four years of retroactive taxes on hundreds of businesses because it lost a court fight with one business. It was a fight that started in 2008 over whether the company qualified for a tax break that encourages entrepreneurs — a partial state income tax exclusion on sales of stock of a “Qualified Small Business.”
At xconomy.com, victimized businessman Brian Overstreet shares his horrific story of facing a huge ex post facto tax decree, and explains its genesis:
“The company at issue in that lawsuit did not meet one of the QSB requirements—that it maintain 80 percent of its employees and assets in California. In August of 2012, the California Court of Appeals sided with the plaintiff, ruling that denying him the QSB exclusion based on the ’80 percent requirement’ was an unconstitutional violation of the interstate commerce clause.
“Since the FTB lost the case, you might think that they would strike the unconstitutional requirement and keep the rest of QSB statute intact. Not a chance.
“What the FTB did instead was to take their ball and go home. They decided that since they could not impose the 80 percent requirement, no one would be entitled to the QSB exclusion. They put out an announcement terminating the Qualified Small Business exclusion and retroactively disqualifying all exclusions and deferrals going all the way back to 2008.”
This is bonkers. You don’t get much more anti-business than punishing business owners out of pique over losing a lawsuit that those business owners had nothing to do with.
Overstreet’s takeaway from this assault on sanity:
“1. If you are a business founder or early investor who sold stock since 2008 and took the QSB exclusion: Surprise! You are going to get a bill from the FTB for the 50 percent of the taxes you excluded plus interest plus possible penalties.
“2. If you are a business founder or early investor and have not yet sold stock: Rethink your business and tax planning strategies. Consider whether it’s fiscally prudent to stay in California.
“3. If you a contemplating starting or investing in a California business: Think long and hard. Consider out-of-state alternatives.”
If Jerry Brown really means what he says about wanting to help grow jobs in California, here’s what he should do: Clean house at the Franchise Tax Board.
FTB Executive Director Selvi Stanislaus? He should be gone, for starters. And so should everyone at FTB who thought this made sense.
But there’s a little problem with the let’s-clean-house theory. According to the FTB’s website, who are the three members of the agency’s governing board?
1) Ana Matosantos. As in Jerry Brown’s director of finance.
Evidently word of the governor’s desire to help the private sector hasn’t reached his Cabinet.
2) Jerome Horton. As in the former Democratic lawmaker from Inglewood appointed by Brown to the FTB oversight post.
Evidently word of the governor’s desire to help the private sector hasn’t been shared with his board appointees.
3) John Chiang. As in the state controller, elected by the voters.
Evidently breaking trust with job-creating entrepreneurs in such grotesque and extreme fashion isn’t a big deal to the veteran Democrat who fancies himself as governor material.
I look forward to watching this story play out. Most mainstream media in California have little sympathy for business complaints. But everyone can relate to the story of people hit with four years of dubious back taxes because of childishness and stupidity from tax bureaucrats. And their bosses.
Your move, Gov. Brown. Yo, Jerry: Do you think this is fair? Tolerable? Honorable?
We shall see.
Source URL: https://calwatchdog.com/2013/01/20/tax-board-insanity-do-governors-appointees-just-tune-him-out/
Copyright ©2021 CalWatchdog.com unless otherwise noted.