Comments on: CA lawmakers advance gun-control bills

By: Joaquin Hahs

Joaquin Hahs — Tue, 13 Aug 2013 22:51:47 +0000

brady bill testimony – http://youtu.be/BKuUVduvoJo If you think gun control is the answer you fuzzy math is…. fuzzy.

By: Bill Mandates Nonexistent Gun-Safety Technology — California Political Review

Bill Mandates Nonexistent Gun-Safety Technology — California Political Review — Sun, 24 Mar 2013 15:56:12 +0000

[…] California Legislature has already advanced bills and resolutions on gun control, including SJR 1 and SB 140. There are many ways to make sure that guns stay out of the hands of […]

By: Bryan

Bryan — Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:25:06 +0000

Self defense is a human right that applies to EVERYONE, not just the lawmakers. If they want to disarm citizens they should also disarm the guards that protect them. That’s fair, right?

By: SkippingDog

SkippingDog — Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:08:32 +0000

Excellent points Ted, as usual. The gun nuts love to whine that assault weapons are used in fewer homicides than hammers or common hand tools, but they never seem able to compare the completely logical extension of an assault weapons ban to working prohibitions on other dangerous items like those you list above.

If we had as few assault weapons in circulation as there are licensed Title 3 NFA weapons, and they were as tightly regulated, their criminal use would be nearly unknown. That’s exactly why the National Firearms Act and the Gun Control Act of 1968 were passed in the first place, and the gun nut invocation of talking points that include “criminals don’t use machine guns, etc.” are only possible because of those restrictive laws.

Scalia is getting fatter and redder in the face each time he shows up here in SoCal for his summer vacation. I hope he eats a lot of red meat and fat again this year and is quickly promoted to the Celestial Supreme Court for all of our sake. Then we might be able to do something about handguns.

By: StevefromSacto

StevefromSacto — Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:56:06 +0000

C’mon Katy, get real. Yes I disagreed with many of President Bush’s policies. But I always respected him as our President, especially in the days following 9/11. I would never say “Dubya and his ilk are a ‘public disease.'”

I disagreed with President Reagan, but I respected him…especially his willingness to reach across party lines to try to solve our nation’s problems.

There is a difference between disagreement and disrespect. Unpatriotic morons like “US citizen” and fish clearly cross the line.

It shouldn’t be “difficult” for you to respect the current President. As former Senator Richard Lugar said: “You can disagree with President Obama without hating him.” Sadly, those words led to Lugar being thrown out of office by the Rabid Right.

By: Renee

Renee — Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:40:59 +0000

If YOU Don’t Have A Gun,
Get One Now. <>To FIRE

By: Renee

Renee — Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:37:13 +0000

~
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Germany established gun control in 1938 and from
1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.

China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to
1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From
1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million ‘educated’ people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated

Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.

~
_”Ø”( Zer Φ ) Huϟϟein
HAS Bitten OFF Way More
Than He Can Chew With-
His Regime and this gun
Control Rubbiϟh
*We The People* We Want Him
GONE__
ALL MUST Now Strap on
Our Spur’s and Dig In.
America’s Freedom Loving People
Are in for the Ride Of Our Lives!!
By Defending OUR Life and Property
From Criminal Attack.

If I’m Arrested So What?
Better Tried by Twelve
Than Carried by Six!

Our family has 2 Fire Extinguishers
That we purchased 6 years ago just in case…
Thankfully they haven’t been needed
But, we have the peace of mind just knowing
They Are Here.
No Different Owning a Gun,
We may Never have to use it, and most
Likely We won’t.
However, I don’t want to Feel Helpless
Because I was UNPREPARED!

If YOU Don’t Have A Gun,
Get One Now. <>To FIRE

геηее’s
San Diego

By: The Modified Ted Steele Methodologies (tm)

The Modified Ted Steele Methodologies (tm) — Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:01:45 +0000

lol Honda—your simplistic world view. You know why claymores, bazookas and machine guns kill zero Americans? They are unlawful to sell or own little buddy.

By: Hondo

Hondo — Thu, 14 Mar 2013 01:47:50 +0000

30 years ago, I traveled quite a bit in Mexico. This was long before that country went into violent melt down. Most guns are illegal in Mexico. You could have a rifle for shooting deer, but even that was hard to get. Only the very wealthy could afford the process of getting a gun.
But in the last 10 years, Mexico has turned into the old wild west times a hundred. Guns are still mostly illegal but the cartels have lots of them. Truck loads of them. 40,000 thousand killed in that country with guns in the last 6 years or so. Only the paid off police and the cartels have guns. The rest of the country is simply target practice for the cartels and the police. 40,000 killed and a hand full of arrests and convictions.
So go ahead and ban guns. And start ducking the bullets.
Hondo…..

By: stolson

stolson — Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:57:36 +0000

Drug runners and cartels will sell the guns on the black market. The average citizen with a handgun will be the fall guy in these laws now. Criminals will feel bolder to commit home invasions if they think no one has a gun to protect themselves. Sportsmen will also suffer as the metrosexuals who seem to influence govt disapprove of hunting.
Politicians will pat themselves on the backs(unless recalls begin and they feel some heat)-as adhering to the UN’s agenda of disarming the common folk.
Registration could mean confiscation.