PG&E needed land for a pipeline is this OK?
PG&E needed land for transmission towers, is this OK?
If land is needed for a toll road, is this OK? Only public roads?

You are showing the impractical side of libertarianism. My guess is that along any proposed route for a road, pipeline, transmission line, railroad, canal, port, bridge, etc, there will be at least one person would will not sell their land, no matter what the price.

Perhaps you are suggesting that all of these should be owned by the state as then taking land would be OK.

WOW! John Seiler is a closet communist.

You cannot favor private over state-owned enterprises but then deny the private companies the tools they need to do their job.

What type of dystopian future do you desire? One without roads, pipelines, railroads or one where these are only state-owned?

“NEW YORK (AP) – For the first time, the top export of the United States, the world’s biggest gas guzzler, is — wait for it — fuel.”

Confiscate land in Texas so the refinery can export 117 MILLION gallons of gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel a day.

Experts say the trend helps explain why U.S. motorists are paying more for gasoline. The more fuel that’s sent overseas, the less of a supply cushion there is at home. Fuel supplies are exported to the highest bidder. It’s a world market.