<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Only 54% oppose bullet train? Sheesh	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2013/03/21/only-54-oppose-bullet-train-sheesh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/03/21/only-54-oppose-bullet-train-sheesh/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:52:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hondo		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/03/21/only-54-oppose-bullet-train-sheesh/#comment-9530</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hondo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=39673#comment-9530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The most scary thing that occurred to me recently, was that Pravda, the old soviet newspaper of lies, now practices better journalism than any of Amerika&#039;s major newspapers.  There are a hundred ways to &#039;push&#039; a poll to get the results you want.  
Hondo...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most scary thing that occurred to me recently, was that Pravda, the old soviet newspaper of lies, now practices better journalism than any of Amerika&#8217;s major newspapers.  There are a hundred ways to &#8216;push&#8217; a poll to get the results you want.<br />
Hondo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dyspeptic		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/03/21/only-54-oppose-bullet-train-sheesh/#comment-9529</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dyspeptic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 01:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=39673#comment-9529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Katy, I was thinking the exact same thing when reading this article. I don&#039;t know who this John Meyers clown is, but it is ridiculously naive to think that polling organizations or think tanks are &quot;non-partisan&quot;. They all make that claim to maintain tax exempt status but in reality they have ideological bias and a partisan axe to grind. I feel sorry for the dunces who get sucked in to the non-partisan label and end up trusting PPIC or any other mainstream polling operation. I&#039;m sure the New York Times and MSNBC make the same ridiculous claim but who can believe them?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katy, I was thinking the exact same thing when reading this article. I don&#8217;t know who this John Meyers clown is, but it is ridiculously naive to think that polling organizations or think tanks are &#8220;non-partisan&#8221;. They all make that claim to maintain tax exempt status but in reality they have ideological bias and a partisan axe to grind. I feel sorry for the dunces who get sucked in to the non-partisan label and end up trusting PPIC or any other mainstream polling operation. I&#8217;m sure the New York Times and MSNBC make the same ridiculous claim but who can believe them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CalWatchdog		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/03/21/only-54-oppose-bullet-train-sheesh/#comment-9528</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=39673#comment-9528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s start with the story fallacy about the PPIC -  there is nothing non-partisan about the PPIC. They regularly work in tandem with the majority party at the Capitol. 

The Legislative Analyst&#039;s Office is having a heard time these days being non-partisan. The PPIC claims not to have a political bias, but it is abundantly clear with the loaded questions in their surveys that the group has a strong and biased political outlook. Questions in their surveys always appear geared to eliciting the responses supporting Democratic policies. 

Katy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s start with the story fallacy about the PPIC &#8211;  there is nothing non-partisan about the PPIC. They regularly work in tandem with the majority party at the Capitol. </p>
<p>The Legislative Analyst&#8217;s Office is having a heard time these days being non-partisan. The PPIC claims not to have a political bias, but it is abundantly clear with the loaded questions in their surveys that the group has a strong and biased political outlook. Questions in their surveys always appear geared to eliciting the responses supporting Democratic policies. </p>
<p>Katy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-14 16:16:06 by W3 Total Cache
-->