Fracking watch: Brazil figures out what CA hasn’t

by CalWatchdog Staff | May 1, 2013 6:45 am

May 1, 2013

By Chris Reed

The passage of anti-fracking legislation[1] by an Assembly committee Monday could lead to a showdown between green Dem lawmakers and Gov. Jerry Brown, who’s struck a measured tone so far on hyrdaulic fracturing, the radically improved energy extraction technology that’s touched off an economic boom in the Dakotas, Montana, Texas, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

But what’s really needed is a showdown between the U.S. environmental movement and reality. Fracking is not new. It occurs thousands of feet below the groundwater table and the Obama administration has concluded it’s just another heavy industry, not the devil. And if California doesn’t exploit its huge energy reserves, that won’t stop the rest of the world from joining the brown energy revolution, leaving the Golden State at a huge competitive disadvantage and killing manufacturing as a noticeable source of jobs.

Brazil-National-Flag

Fracking sanity chapter No. 5: Brazil

This is why that starting last Saturday, every morning I’ve been blogging about the nations around the world that are embracing fracking. So far I’ve covered Germany[2], China[3], Russia[4] and Saudi Arabia[5]. Today I’m writing about Brazil, which is on track to be an economic superpower in coming decades because of its immense natural resources. My point: The fracking/brown energy revolution is coming, regardless of what greens in Brentwood, Santa Barbara and San Francisco think, and that California can either join in the party or get left behind.

“From the shale underlying Western Pennsylvania to the deep-sea oil off the coast of Brazil, emerging energy sources have policymakers and entrepreneurs from both hemispheres talking business. … oil fields off the coast here — and shale formations in the country’s south — have Brazilian companies keen on drilling, and Pennsylvania’s experiences exploring and extracting natural gas from the Marcellus Shale have been a central point of discussion since a trade delegation began meetings in Sao Paulo this week.

“‘They have a very similar balance of energy portfolio,’ [Pennsylvania] Gov. Tom Corbett said in an interview. … On a one-day visit here Wednesday, Mr. Corbett met with Sergio Cabral, governor of Rio de Janeiro state, in his office at the Palacio Guanabara, the seat of state government. In addition to discussing conditions for business and systems of education in their states, Mr. Corbett said, the governors signed an agreement to collaborate, particularly on issues related to oil and natural gas. … ‘He’s very interested in the shale gas because they do have shale gas.’

“Mr. Corbett said he discussed a similar agreement during an earlier meeting with the vice governor of Sao Paulo. …

“Braskem America has five U.S. plants, a research and development center in Pittsburgh and last year acquired a portion of the Sunoco refinery at Marcus Hook, outside of Philadelphia. …”

“‘We are all aware of the shale gas revolution in the United States since the start of this century,’ said Carlos Mariani, vice president of the Federation of Industries of the State of Rio de Janeiro.”

Who bragged about gains from U.S. fracking? His initials are BHO

That’s from an April 12 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette story[6]. Thirty-one fracking companies, many from the U.S., have set up shop[7] in Brazil. That reflects an important point that doesn’t get brought up much. America’s fracking expertise means the rest of the world will have to rely on our firms for years to come — another direct boon for our economy besides the cheap energy resulting from fracking on U.S. land.

And I would like to once again point out that the White House is OK with fracking. Who bragged about the U.S. becoming the “Saudi Arabia of natural gas” — thanks entirely to fracking — on the campaign trail?

A fellow named Barack Obama[8]. Here’s the video clip[9] for green propagandists. Not that it will stop them.

Greenpeace hinted at the truth in a 2012 policy statement.

“Greenpeace opposes fracking[10] because it diverts from real solutions (including energy efficiency and renewables), and the full effects on the environment and health has not been fully investigated or addressed.”

Reason no. 1 is what drives the myths. The greens were so close to having their worldview be the only accepted alternative going forward on energy issues. Then fracking changed the world.

 

Fracking watch: Previous posts

No. 1: Germany[2]

No. 2: China[3]

No. 3: Russia[4]

No. 4: Saudi Arabia[5]

Endnotes:
  1. anti-fracking legislation: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2013/apr/29/assembly-committee-passes-three-bills-to-impose/
  2. Germany: http://www.calwatchdog.com/2013/04/27/fracking-watch-germany-figures-out-what-ca-hasnt/
  3. China: http://www.calwatchdog.com/2013/04/28/fracking-watch-china-figures-out-what-ca-hasnt/
  4. Russia: http://www.calwatchdog.com/2013/04/29/fracking-watch-russia-figures-out-what-ca-hasnt/
  5. Saudi Arabia: http://www.calwatchdog.com/2013/04/30/fracking-watch-saudi-arabia-figures-out-what-ca-hasnt/
  6. April 12 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette story: http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/state/brazilian-leaders-express-interest-in-pa-shale-drilling-regulation-683154/
  7. set up shop: http://www.environmental-expert.com/soil-groundwater/hydraulic-fracturing/companies/location-brazil
  8. Barack Obama: http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/jan/26/obama-we-are-saudi-arabia-natural-gas/
  9. video clip: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/video/obama-energy-us-saudia-arabia-gas-15449452
  10. Greenpeace opposes fracking: http://www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/Global/eu-unit/reports-briefings/2012%20pubs/Pubs%202%20Apr-Jun/Joint%20statement%20on%20fracking.pdf

Source URL: https://calwatchdog.com/2013/05/01/fracking-watch-brazil-figures-out-what-ca-hasnt/