<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Obama interior secretary shreds fracking foes &#8212; LAT omits	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2013/05/18/obama-interior-secretary-shreds-fracking-foes-lat-omits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/05/18/obama-interior-secretary-shreds-fracking-foes-lat-omits/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:13:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jimmydeeoc		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/05/18/obama-interior-secretary-shreds-fracking-foes-lat-omits/#comment-11764</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmydeeoc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=42881#comment-11764</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is there any truth to the rumor that the Koch brothers are seriously considering buying The Tribune Company?  I pray it is so.  The simultaneous head explosions would easily register a 4.0., probably centered somewhere around Brentwood. 

A couple weeks ago, the LA City Council put forth a motion to voice its disapproval.......

&quot;......Three Los Angeles City Coun­cil mem­bers — in­clud­ing may­or­al can­did­ate Eric Gar­cetti — asked their col­leagues Tues­day to con­sider pulling city pen­sion money from the in­vest­ment firms that own the Los Angeles Times if they sell the pub­lic­a­tion to buy­ers who do not sup­port “pro­fes­sion­al and ob­ject­ive journ­al­ism.”....&quot;

A DOUBLE BONUS!.......First, the extortion.  Then there&#039;s the implication The Times in its current form &quot;supports pro­fes­sion­al and ob­ject­ive journ­al­ism.” 

You really CAN&#039;T make this stuff up.

http://documents.latimes.com/city-council-motion-explore-city-role-times-sale/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any truth to the rumor that the Koch brothers are seriously considering buying The Tribune Company?  I pray it is so.  The simultaneous head explosions would easily register a 4.0., probably centered somewhere around Brentwood. </p>
<p>A couple weeks ago, the LA City Council put forth a motion to voice its disapproval&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;&#8230;Three Los Angeles City Coun­cil mem­bers — in­clud­ing may­or­al can­did­ate Eric Gar­cetti — asked their col­leagues Tues­day to con­sider pulling city pen­sion money from the in­vest­ment firms that own the Los Angeles Times if they sell the pub­lic­a­tion to buy­ers who do not sup­port “pro­fes­sion­al and ob­ject­ive journ­al­ism.”&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>A DOUBLE BONUS!&#8230;&#8230;.First, the extortion.  Then there&#8217;s the implication The Times in its current form &#8220;supports pro­fes­sion­al and ob­ject­ive journ­al­ism.” </p>
<p>You really CAN&#8217;T make this stuff up.</p>
<p><a href="http://documents.latimes.com/city-council-motion-explore-city-role-times-sale/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://documents.latimes.com/city-council-motion-explore-city-role-times-sale/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-19 15:56:49 by W3 Total Cache
-->