Comments on: Congrats to LAT on success of fracking disinformation campaign

By: Chris Reed

Chris Reed — Tue, 11 Jun 2013 04:42:36 +0000

SkippingDog, why won’t you even engage with the topic — what the L.A. Times did? Is trolling and message control more fun than interacting?

Sheesh.

By: David N

David N — Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:36:52 +0000

If you go to the following website

http://www.aei-ideas.org/2013/04/the-meteoric-rise-in-texas-…

what you see is that Texas has double its oil production between 2010 and now. Actually, predictions are that by 2016, Texas will be up to 3.5 MM bbls/day. This is a bonanza for the state. It would certainly be so for California. If, of course, California could let go of this rediculous fear.

By: SkippingDog

SkippingDog — Mon, 10 Jun 2013 04:13:10 +0000

If you want propaganda, Rob, you should look to the Orange County Register of the San Diego U-T. Those are the primary California propaganda rags.

By: jimmydeeoc

jimmydeeoc — Sun, 09 Jun 2013 19:28:46 +0000

..and Halper’s reporting (cited at the very top) came on the very same day as the San Onofre decision. Regardless of how you feel about San Onofre, it DID produce LOTS of energy.

Not to worry……. We Californians have limitless untapped resources like moonbeams and unicorn farts.

By: Mark Landsbaum

Mark Landsbaum — Sun, 09 Jun 2013 19:27:39 +0000

Excellent Chris. And they won’t the next time either. Guess why.

At your service in Christ . . .

Mark

By: Rob Morse

Rob Morse — Sun, 09 Jun 2013 18:00:55 +0000

Well said, Chris. I never look to the LA Times for news. I look there for propaganda.