<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Enviro, politics could block unique Sacramento museum	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2013/07/15/enviro-politics-could-block-unique-sacramento-museum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/07/15/enviro-politics-could-block-unique-sacramento-museum/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:56:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kim Mack		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/07/15/enviro-politics-could-block-unique-sacramento-museum/#comment-33226</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim Mack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=45877#comment-33226</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ms. Grimes - Thank you for this article as I feel it is important that people in our community are informed about projects that are proposed that will be representative of the community in which they live.  However, there are some errors in your report that need to be cleared up.  1) I was appointed to the Planning Commission by Councilmember Warren. 2) Prior to the Planning Commission meeting where this project was first presented I had not spoken with anyone from the animal rights community.  I am talking with them now because we are on the same page.  3) Once and for all, neither I nor anyone from the Sacramento for Obama 08 crew gave any membership information to anyone - not event the National Obama campaign when they asked for our list - without peoples permission.  I keep asking people to prove this allegation and that is when they stop because they are unable to do so because it did not happen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Grimes &#8211; Thank you for this article as I feel it is important that people in our community are informed about projects that are proposed that will be representative of the community in which they live.  However, there are some errors in your report that need to be cleared up.  1) I was appointed to the Planning Commission by Councilmember Warren. 2) Prior to the Planning Commission meeting where this project was first presented I had not spoken with anyone from the animal rights community.  I am talking with them now because we are on the same page.  3) Once and for all, neither I nor anyone from the Sacramento for Obama 08 crew gave any membership information to anyone &#8211; not event the National Obama campaign when they asked for our list &#8211; without peoples permission.  I keep asking people to prove this allegation and that is when they stop because they are unable to do so because it did not happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hank		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/07/15/enviro-politics-could-block-unique-sacramento-museum/#comment-13568</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 23:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=45877#comment-13568</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Folks willing to spend their own money for something everyone can enjoy, versus swells spending taxpayer money to enrich private individuals. The swells vote nay and the taxpayer gets no say. Am I missing something here?
Perhaps if the museum included a basketball wing or an empty room for value the swells bring to every decent idea, then it would be acceptable.
I wish there was one more rare animal in the collection, unfortunately they are not yet rare enough.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks willing to spend their own money for something everyone can enjoy, versus swells spending taxpayer money to enrich private individuals. The swells vote nay and the taxpayer gets no say. Am I missing something here?<br />
Perhaps if the museum included a basketball wing or an empty room for value the swells bring to every decent idea, then it would be acceptable.<br />
I wish there was one more rare animal in the collection, unfortunately they are not yet rare enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-17 00:13:36 by W3 Total Cache
-->