Comments on: Maviglio upset about our optometry articles

By: John Seiler

John Seiler — Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:45:14 +0000

In reply to Steven Maviglio. Steve, my taxes already subsidize your pay. Do you also want me to do your work for you?

By: John Seiler

John Seiler — Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:44:26 +0000

In reply to Steven Maviglio. No, Steve. If PRI's donors get tax deductions, PRI is not "taxpayer-subsidized." The donors were just allowed to keep a little more of their own, hard-earned money away from the wastrels and tyrants in government, and give it to a good cause.

By: Steven Maviglio

Steven Maviglio — Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:22:53 +0000

And btw, your parent company is tax-exempt, e.g., taxpayer-subsidzed.

By: Steven Maviglio

Steven Maviglio — Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:21:25 +0000

Pacific Research Institute discloses its donors? Do tell!!! Provide the link please!

By: admin

admin — Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:19:19 +0000

Steve M.: “Hit piece”? Just the news.

As to Arnold, I bashed him over and over at the OC Register, including on his corporate connections.

— John Seiler

By: Steve Mehlman

Steve Mehlman — Wed, 14 Aug 2013 18:51:59 +0000

Sorry, Rexie. Maybe you were referring to Steve Maviglio, not me. If so, just a reflex action on my part. My bad.

However, after reading the hit piece on Maviglio, can’t help but wonder where the outrage was when Gov. Schwarzenegger hired corporate lobbyists and other industry people to serve in his administration. No conflict there, eh? LOL.

By: Steve Mehlman

Steve Mehlman — Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:20:46 +0000

Yawn! Just sitting back waiting for your b.s. so I can respond. Like shooting fish in a barrel.

By: Rex the Wonderdog!

Rex the Wonderdog! — Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:54:30 +0000

Steve, where are ya lil buddy, you usually post your own spin here!