Comments on: DiFi attacks New Media journalists

By: Roman Rhyne

Roman Rhyne — Fri, 20 Sep 2013 19:01:41 +0000

In reply to SkippingDog. Don't you know the Baroness DiFi is advocating class warfare? What the woman wants to imply is that we're not as good as her! May her tribe decrease.

By: SkippingDog

SkippingDog — Fri, 20 Sep 2013 06:20:42 +0000

In reply to John Seiler. John - Perhaps you can direct us to where the First Amendment exempts anyone from following the law?

By: bunkerqueen

bunkerqueen — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:48:43 +0000

In reply to Ted Steele DD. J school a waste of time? Of course it is.....just ask the recent grads tardsly. tootles.

By: Rex the Wonderdog!

Rex the Wonderdog! — Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:42:17 +0000

In reply to Scott.

Feinstein is a hypocrite from the word go
==
100%, See my ^^^^ #2 comment.

By: Rex the Wonderdog!

Rex the Wonderdog! — Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:41:51 +0000

In reply to Chrisxman.

I grew sick of her when she was still on the city council. .

==============
No, not true, we never grew sick of DiFi. Isn’t she the one that banned handguns in 1983 as Mayor of SF?? And at the same time blocked the SFPD Chief from giving out CCW permits?? While she was one of only nine people in the city that had a CCW??? Oh my, do as I say, not as I do.

Having said all of that, I do like DiFi, and think on a whole she has served the state fairly well.

By: Rex the Wonderdog!

Rex the Wonderdog! — Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:39:46 +0000

In reply to John Seiler.

Teddy never went to school either, and he is an expert at “everything”….. 😉

By: Rex the Wonderdog!

Rex the Wonderdog! — Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:36:09 +0000

In reply to jimmydeeoc. But SHE HAS to be a senator, how else do you think she would line her hubby's (and her own) POCKET WITH ALL THOSE NO BID GOV COTRATCS HE AND HIS COMPANIES GET AWARDED????????????????

By: John Seiler

John Seiler — Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:40:09 +0000

In reply to SkippingDog. It's because of the First Amendment.

By: SkippingDog

SkippingDog — Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:42:29 +0000

If everyone is a journalist these days, as bloggers here and elsewhere continually try to convince us, then everyone should be treated exactly the same under the law. That would mean no shield laws for anyone, at the state or federal levels. After all, if a normal citizen has a duty to provide testimony in a trial, why should someone committing a random act of “journalism” be treated any differently under our laws?

By: Winston

Winston — Sun, 15 Sep 2013 16:35:51 +0000

DiFi like her Marxist president would prefer state controlled media