Someone who supports rewarding alien lawbreakers who crashed our nation’s borders in violation of our sovereign laws, stole jobs from our American underclass often using fake or stolen ID to do it, and cost the Ca taxpayers upwards of $20B a year for health care, education, welfare and incarcerations, according to a detailed and documented financial analysis by FAIR is neither a social or a fiscal conservative – by definition.

And this doesn’t even document the amount of PRIVATE monetary damage that our citizens have been forced to pay without reimbursement for vandalisms, unreimbursed medical or damage as a result of a car accident, or those who have had loved ones killed by illegal aliens on our roadways or by means of a violent crime. Oh, and there have been many, btw.

So as long as we can agree that such a proponent of CADL’s for illegal aliens or for immigration reform that includes amnesty (providing an illegal alien with immediate legal status in the United States) is neither a social or fiscal conservative – then we can simply agree to disagree on the matter itself.

Fair? If not, tell me why. I am always open to another’s opinion and if it makes sense based on the facts, I will gladly reconsider changing mine.

Afterall, that is what America is supposed to be all about. Right?

So please don’t silence opposing opinons.

Thanks.

What I find far more troubling is source of “undocumented” verbiage in the first place – and we know its a construct of the Left. “Undocumented” my a**. We all know that every Mexican adult MUST have a voter registration card. They DO have documents – and those documents show that they are here ILLEGALLY.

So let’s all (conservatives and liberals alike) join in with Gov Brown and support a Bank Robber Amnesty and Reform Bill. Sure, it might attract a few out of state and out of nation bank robbers too. But it’s the right thing to do.

That would be an issue upon which Gov Brown and I could agree.

That’s very uncharacteristic language for this website. Straight out of the Associated Press style book. So hypothetically, if I were to own an unregistered machine gun would that make me an undocumented gun owner? If I’m operating an illegal methamphetamine lab does that make me merely an undocumented pharmacist?

Next up in the war against citizenship is the right of illegal immigrants to vote, serve on juries and run for political office (they’re “stakeholders” you know). Think that can’t happen? Just wait a few years.

So when do I get to enter Mexico illegally and get a Mexican drivers license, own property, start a business, work without legal permission, benefit from a catch and release immigration policy, get birthright citizenship, etc. It seems that our Mexican neighbors have a shocking double standard on these issues. Oh well, you know what they say – “consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds”.

Don’t you view this as our highest elected officials in the State of California rewarding criminality? And don’t you think that this is just another carrot to attract more illegal indigents to come into our State? If an illegal indigent in Arizona is under scrutiny and is not allowed an Arizona driver’s license, wouldn’t he and his family consider relocating to California where they are rewarded for breaking our immigration laws?

Doctors, architects, lawyers, computer scientists, biologists, chemists, accountants, etc… aren’t breaking into our State, Katy. Indigents come here. The south of the border nations encourage them to come here so that Americans are forced to care for them. It’s a big win for Mexico and a big loss for America. If you don’t believe me, go drive through the various parts of Sacramento where illegal foreigners are known to live. Is that progress? Is that a “win” for Calfornia and for America?

So I just don’t understand your comment about agreeing with Brown. It just doesn’t make any sense coming from a conservative. Maybe if you explained it I would better understand.

Thanks!