Comments on: LAT, Sac Bee fracking coverage: Same old glaring omission

By: Ulysses Uhaul

Ulysses Uhaul — Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:20:19 +0000

Teddy has a point….think on it. ….

Fair and Balanced.

By: eck

eck — Tue, 19 Nov 2013 03:13:24 +0000

In reply to Ted Steele, CEO. Well, no .... It's well below the water table. Actually, read something factual before you spout off. Like what the Interior Sec had to say.

By: S Moderation Douglas

S Moderation Douglas — Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:06:42 +0000

Now we are willing to accept the presidents opinion?

Is that selective credibility?

By: Ted Steele, CEO

Ted Steele, CEO — Mon, 18 Nov 2013 14:54:58 +0000

Fracking??

Hmmm…600 hi pressure chemicals shot into the water table deep beneath our homes—– what could possibly go wrong?

Cue the Chamber of Commerce Fracking Institute response…in…3….2….1…….

By: jimmydeeoc

jimmydeeoc — Sun, 17 Nov 2013 18:51:57 +0000

I vote bias at the top.

One wonders about the background of an “Energy and Environment” reporter at LAT, such as Banerjee. A BA in Physics or Chemistry, perhaps? LOL…. Of course not.

More than likely a resume chock full of “activism” and other placard waving. Look at that hippie clown they have (or had, as I haven’t checked in a while) as the “environment” reporter the OCR. At least his predecessor, Gary Robbins, knew something about and had an interest in science. But he bolted for the U-T few years back, and now we are left with Hippie Pat, whose idea of “reporting” is nothing more than endlessly reciting tired Green bromides no different than you might hear in Sproul Plaza.