<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mizzou vs. CA egg fight	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/05/mizzou-vs-ca-egg-fight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/05/mizzou-vs-ca-egg-fight/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 21:13:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rex the Wonder Dog!		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/05/mizzou-vs-ca-egg-fight/#comment-68867</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex the Wonder Dog!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 21:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=58995#comment-68867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;The lawsuit by Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster takes aim at a California law set to take effect in 2015 that prohibits eggs from being sold there if they come from hens raised in cages that don’t comply with California’s new size and space requirements. If the law goes into effect, it will limit competition for California egg producers, allowing them to raise prices on California consumers.&lt;/b&gt;

The Missouri lawsuit is DOA.

There was a similar lawsuit over CA milk sales a few years back brought by AZ food distributor Shamrock Foods, who were selling AZ milk to  So. CA vendors, such as restaurants and schools. CA has higher regulatory standards for processing milk than AZ, and Shamrock said it was not needed and only used as a protection for CA dairies. The court ruled that CA has the right to impose higher regulatory standards on products sold within its&#039; borders under the health and safety clauses of the US Constitution. You can find the case if you Google it. I don&#039;t recall if it was a federal or state court case, which could definitely make a difference.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The lawsuit by Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster takes aim at a California law set to take effect in 2015 that prohibits eggs from being sold there if they come from hens raised in cages that don’t comply with California’s new size and space requirements. If the law goes into effect, it will limit competition for California egg producers, allowing them to raise prices on California consumers.</b></p>
<p>The Missouri lawsuit is DOA.</p>
<p>There was a similar lawsuit over CA milk sales a few years back brought by AZ food distributor Shamrock Foods, who were selling AZ milk to  So. CA vendors, such as restaurants and schools. CA has higher regulatory standards for processing milk than AZ, and Shamrock said it was not needed and only used as a protection for CA dairies. The court ruled that CA has the right to impose higher regulatory standards on products sold within its&#8217; borders under the health and safety clauses of the US Constitution. You can find the case if you Google it. I don&#8217;t recall if it was a federal or state court case, which could definitely make a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LetitCollapse		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/05/mizzou-vs-ca-egg-fight/#comment-68848</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LetitCollapse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=58995#comment-68848</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The price of eggs have skyrocketed in the last year or so. I could buy a dozen medium eggs 12 months ago for $0.99. That price is now $1.79. I wonder if the new state laws contributed to that price increase or whether it&#039;s a result of inflation via quantitative easing, or both?

As soon as SCOTUS Roberts flipped and ruled that mandated insurance was allowable under the Commerce Clause since it was a tax I knew the fix was in. Basically, the oligarchs can justify anything they want to, regardless of the original intent of constitutional law. If they don&#039;t like it they just find a way to sidestep it. And the sheeple consent. 

Many industries with favored congressional privileges have been monopolized via ant-trust exemptions. Healthcare and higher education immediately come to mind. That&#039;s the reason you pay so much for both. Because the free market has been extracted out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The price of eggs have skyrocketed in the last year or so. I could buy a dozen medium eggs 12 months ago for $0.99. That price is now $1.79. I wonder if the new state laws contributed to that price increase or whether it&#8217;s a result of inflation via quantitative easing, or both?</p>
<p>As soon as SCOTUS Roberts flipped and ruled that mandated insurance was allowable under the Commerce Clause since it was a tax I knew the fix was in. Basically, the oligarchs can justify anything they want to, regardless of the original intent of constitutional law. If they don&#8217;t like it they just find a way to sidestep it. And the sheeple consent. </p>
<p>Many industries with favored congressional privileges have been monopolized via ant-trust exemptions. Healthcare and higher education immediately come to mind. That&#8217;s the reason you pay so much for both. Because the free market has been extracted out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-21 12:43:45 by W3 Total Cache
-->