Gov. Brown redefines ongoing programs as emergency drought aid

by Wayne Lusvardi | February 20, 2014 9:41 am


Brown drought relief, governor's site[1]Thirty-four days after California Gov. Jerry Brown declared an official statewide drought emergency[2], he joined State Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg and Assembly Speaker John A. Perez on Feb. 19[3] in announcing an emergency drought aid package[4]. (They are pictured at right from the event.) 

Ninety five percent of the $687.4 million drought aid package, or $647.7 million, comes from the continuation of existing, ongoing programs, many of which began before an awareness of a protracted drought.  The remaining 5 percent of the funding comes from shifting air pollution taxes collected in 2013 under the cap-and-trade air emission program toward water conservation and efficiency projects.

The governor’s drought package is the culmination of a bill, SB731, that Steinberg had been shepherding through the Legislature for some time[5].

As detailed in the table below, the $687.4 million emergency drought bill is funded from the following sources:

Even though there is very little that is new in Brown’s drought bill, it will assure parched small water districts in Central California that funding is potentially available for relief efforts and projects.

Seventeen small water districts[10] in California have been preliminarily identified as possibly running out of drinking water in the next two to four months.  Two of these water districts in Mendocino and Sonoma counties along the Northern Coast are not even connected to the state or federal water projects.

Former Gov. Pete Wilson’s emergency policy

Brown suspended the California Environmental Quality Act in his official emergency drought declaration. But so far he hasn’t made steps to use that power to enlarge Shasta Dam[11] or other projects.

By contrast, in 1994 after the Northridge earthquake, Gov. Pete Wilson[12] invoked emergency powers to repair the Santa Monica freeway in four months.

Today, focus of the Democratic majority in both the governor’s office and the Legislature is to continue the course with mostly existing water conservation projects, not take emergency action through new construction.

Perpetual conservation or new water storage? 

Nobody can predict all the impacts of this drought because no one knows its duration, even California’s expert climate change scientists[13].

Mike Wade of the California Farm Water Coalition reports that farmers spent $2 billion[14] since 2003 on irrigation water conservation projects.  Six water bonds from 2000 to 2011, Propositions 12, 13, 40, 50, 84, and 1E[15], totaling $19.55 billion, don’t seem to have produced much of a demonstrable result.

The total of the bond funding equates to 78 percent of the proposed, and much-criticized, $25 billion Delta Twin Tunnels project[16].  So far, California hasn’t been getting much bang for its buck with conservation projects.

Brown, Steinberg and Perez’s emergency drought bill can’t make it rain. Legislatures and voter initiatives can fund more empty water bonds, but may only anger a public whose money has been taken for a water dousing rod that didn’t work.

Ultimately, Californians will have to vote on whether they want continual conservation policies that make for higher water rates, new reservoirs and tunnels to convey added system water — especially during droughts.

Breakdown of Gov. Brown’s Drought Aid Package 

Item Amount Percent Total Source Department Status
Enhancing Water Conservation and Improving Water Supplies $549 million 81% Prop. 84[17] and Prop. 1-E[18] Water Bonds Natural Resources Agency Ongoing
Food Assistance $25.3 million 4% State General Fund for admin. only;FEMA, Fed. Emergency Food Assistance Program[19] Calif. DPSS, Federal FEMA Food & Shelter Board Ongoing
Drought related housing assistance $21 million 3% State General Fund for admin.;FEMA[20] Calif. Dept. of Housing & Community Development[21]; FEMA Ongoing
Grants to agencies to improve water efficiency $20 million 3% Greenhouse Gas Fund; air pollution taxes Calif. Dept. of Water Resources Fund shifting for Cal-Trans sprinkler systems
Emergency Drinking Water Fund $15 million 2% AB 21[22] & AB 118[23](2013) Calif. Dept. Public Health Ongoing(2013)
Groundwater management $14 million 2% AB 21[22] (2013) Calif. Dept. of Public Health Ongoing(2013)
Water use efficiency, reduce fire fuel sources $13 million 2% General Fund Dept. Forestry & Fire Protection[24]; Calif. Conservation Corps[25] Ongoing wildfire brush clearance
Irrigation & water pumping systems that reduce air pollution $10 million 1% Greenhouse Gas Fund; air pollution taxes Cal. Dept. Food & Agriculture Fund shifting
Water efficiency projects $10 million 1% Greenhouse Gas Fund Dept. Water Resources Fund shifting
Unidentified $10.1 million 1% Un-identified Un-identified Unknown
Total $687.4 million 100% See above See above See above
Note: Numbers from governor’s office don’t add up.  See here[26].


  1. [Image]:
  2. official statewide drought emergency:
  3. Feb. 19:
  4. emergency drought aid package:
  5. Steinberg had been shepherding through the Legislature for some time:
  6. Proposition 84, the Safe Drinking Water Bond Act of 2006:
  7. Proposition 1E, the Disaster Preparedness and Flood Protection Bond Act of 2006:
  8. Safe Drinking Water and Small Community Emergency Grant Fund:
  9. the Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund:
  10. Seventeen small water districts:
  11. enlarge Shasta Dam:
  12. Gov. Pete Wilson:
  13. climate change scientists:
  14. $2 billion:
  15. Propositions 12, 13, 40, 50, 84, and 1E:
  16. $25 billion Delta Twin Tunnels project:
  17. Prop. 84:
  18. Prop. 1-E:
  19. FEMA, Fed. Emergency Food Assistance Program:
  20. FEMA:
  21. Calif. Dept. of Housing & Community Development:
  22. AB 21:
  23. AB 118:
  24. Dept. Forestry & Fire Protection:
  25. Calif. Conservation Corps:
  26. here:

Source URL: