<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why is CalSTRS&#8217; version of corporate skulduggery tolerated?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Caroline		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-87981</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caroline]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=59916#comment-87981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot; The &quot;cause&quot; was clear enough, an undisguised contempt for FNC, although Psaki&#039;s &quot;dead 
fish&quot; reference was ambiguous. Sports activities - Most certainly one of the primary considerations that sports fans go for Watch Television is that it delivers a massive number of sports Letmewatchthiss to choose from. This includes as balanced diet and regular excercise.

Feel free to visit my blog post ... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fox news&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; The &#8220;cause&#8221; was clear enough, an undisguised contempt for FNC, although Psaki&#8217;s &#8220;dead<br />
fish&#8221; reference was ambiguous. Sports activities &#8211; Most certainly one of the primary considerations that sports fans go for Watch Television is that it delivers a massive number of sports Letmewatchthiss to choose from. This includes as balanced diet and regular excercise.</p>
<p>Feel free to visit my blog post &#8230; <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/" rel="nofollow">fox news</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: S Moderation Douglas		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-72116</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S Moderation Douglas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 16:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=59916#comment-72116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-72105&quot;&gt;Ted Steele, CEO&lt;/a&gt;.

Ha Ha!

He knows &quot;TL math&quot;:

*ASSUME* the average CalPERS retire retires at fifty with $100,000 per year, plus three percent COLA every year and $20,000 medical per year, for LIFE. 

It&#039;s a wonder we&#039;re not swamped already.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-72105">Ted Steele, CEO</a>.</p>
<p>Ha Ha!</p>
<p>He knows &#8220;TL math&#8221;:</p>
<p>*ASSUME* the average CalPERS retire retires at fifty with $100,000 per year, plus three percent COLA every year and $20,000 medical per year, for LIFE. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a wonder we&#8217;re not swamped already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Steele, CEO		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-72106</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Steele, CEO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=59916#comment-72106</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good Morning girls!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning girls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Steele, CEO		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-72105</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Steele, CEO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=59916#comment-72105</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[TL--- You live in a dream world. What is the date Calpers is going to zero? If you can&#039;t tell me you&#039;re a fraud. Or unfamiliar with Mr. Math.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TL&#8212; You live in a dream world. What is the date Calpers is going to zero? If you can&#8217;t tell me you&#8217;re a fraud. Or unfamiliar with Mr. Math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tough Love		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-72032</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tough Love]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 21:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=59916#comment-72032</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-72006&quot;&gt;Tough Love&lt;/a&gt;.

Skippy,  when (not if) the money runs out, it won&#039;t matter.  

Retiree could delay that impact if they acknowledge that current accruals are simply way too generous, unnecessary, and unaffordable .... and then support the material FUTURE-Service pension accrual rate reductions we so greatly need.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-72006">Tough Love</a>.</p>
<p>Skippy,  when (not if) the money runs out, it won&#8217;t matter.  </p>
<p>Retiree could delay that impact if they acknowledge that current accruals are simply way too generous, unnecessary, and unaffordable &#8230;. and then support the material FUTURE-Service pension accrual rate reductions we so greatly need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SkippingDog		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-72011</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SkippingDog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 17:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=59916#comment-72011</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-72006&quot;&gt;Tough Love&lt;/a&gt;.

As you well know, TL, Reed&#039;s proposal is nothing more than an attempt to get the camel&#039;s nose under the tent.  That doesn&#039;t change the fact that CalSTRS has existing obligations to keep that will be funded one way or another.

You make no more sense than the Teabillies who thought it would be a good idea to default on our national debt by refusing to increase the debt limit last year.  Fortunately, cooler and saner heads prevailed on that issue, just as they will eventually do on this one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-72006">Tough Love</a>.</p>
<p>As you well know, TL, Reed&#8217;s proposal is nothing more than an attempt to get the camel&#8217;s nose under the tent.  That doesn&#8217;t change the fact that CalSTRS has existing obligations to keep that will be funded one way or another.</p>
<p>You make no more sense than the Teabillies who thought it would be a good idea to default on our national debt by refusing to increase the debt limit last year.  Fortunately, cooler and saner heads prevailed on that issue, just as they will eventually do on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tough Love		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-72006</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tough Love]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 16:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=59916#comment-72006</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-71983&quot;&gt;SkippingDog&lt;/a&gt;.

No Skippy, it would be far better to reduce FUTURE Service pension accrual of all CURRENT workers to a level with a value (considering BOTH the richness of the formulas AND the provsions) no greater than those of reasonably comparable Private Sector workers.

Doing so would fix the problem going forward ..... and stop digging the hole deeper each day.

ONLY THEN should Taxpayers even consider addressing PAST Service accruals.

If you won&#039;t the FUTURE, them you&#039;ll lose the PAST as well.  If the retiree had any brains (i.e., financial common sense), they would SUPPORT Reed&#039;s proposal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-71983">SkippingDog</a>.</p>
<p>No Skippy, it would be far better to reduce FUTURE Service pension accrual of all CURRENT workers to a level with a value (considering BOTH the richness of the formulas AND the provsions) no greater than those of reasonably comparable Private Sector workers.</p>
<p>Doing so would fix the problem going forward &#8230;.. and stop digging the hole deeper each day.</p>
<p>ONLY THEN should Taxpayers even consider addressing PAST Service accruals.</p>
<p>If you won&#8217;t the FUTURE, them you&#8217;ll lose the PAST as well.  If the retiree had any brains (i.e., financial common sense), they would SUPPORT Reed&#8217;s proposal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SkippingDog		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-71983</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SkippingDog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 06:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=59916#comment-71983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-71979&quot;&gt;Tough Love&lt;/a&gt;.

It would be far better to give the CalSTRS Board the same authority for setting rates that the CalPERS Board now has.  That would prevent the unnecessary politicization of what we all know will eventually happen anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-71979">Tough Love</a>.</p>
<p>It would be far better to give the CalSTRS Board the same authority for setting rates that the CalPERS Board now has.  That would prevent the unnecessary politicization of what we all know will eventually happen anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SkippingDog		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-71982</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SkippingDog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 06:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=59916#comment-71982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-71895&quot;&gt;Donkey&lt;/a&gt;.

Not at all, Donkey.  I&#039;ve generally been able to resolve most problems without any use of force at all, and learned long ago that talking things out was far better than fighting them out.  That&#039;s why I&#039;ve had a very successful career and avoided unnecessary injuries along the way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-71895">Donkey</a>.</p>
<p>Not at all, Donkey.  I&#8217;ve generally been able to resolve most problems without any use of force at all, and learned long ago that talking things out was far better than fighting them out.  That&#8217;s why I&#8217;ve had a very successful career and avoided unnecessary injuries along the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tough Love		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-71979</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tough Love]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 06:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=59916#comment-71979</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-71734&quot;&gt;SeeSaw&lt;/a&gt;.

Let&#039;s makeit a line item when YOUR property taxes aren&#039;t protected by Prop 13.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/02/26/dont-tolerate-calstrs-version-of-corporate-skulduggery/#comment-71734">SeeSaw</a>.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s makeit a line item when YOUR property taxes aren&#8217;t protected by Prop 13.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-19 19:56:46 by W3 Total Cache
-->