<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sen. Boxer: Conservation would solve drought	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 01:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Randy Parreira		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-75980</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy Parreira]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 01:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=61058#comment-75980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-74982&quot;&gt;SkippingDog&lt;/a&gt;.

your an idiot]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-74982">SkippingDog</a>.</p>
<p>your an idiot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: S Moderation Douglas		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-75347</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S Moderation Douglas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=61058#comment-75347</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-75044&quot;&gt;Larry-Klamath River&lt;/a&gt;.

Swimming pools use less water than the equivalent area in lawn. I haven&#039;t added water to mine in over eight years. 

This time of year I  have to pump off the excess whenever it rains.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-75044">Larry-Klamath River</a>.</p>
<p>Swimming pools use less water than the equivalent area in lawn. I haven&#8217;t added water to mine in over eight years. </p>
<p>This time of year I  have to pump off the excess whenever it rains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Steele, Manager		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-75131</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Steele, Manager]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 17:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=61058#comment-75131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good question Pack and Ship
Answer--
Doomers eat mainly twinkies (tm) and diet Coke (tm)
We eat only Kale.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question Pack and Ship<br />
Answer&#8211;<br />
Doomers eat mainly twinkies &#8482; and diet Coke &#8482;<br />
We eat only Kale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SkippingDog		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-75111</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SkippingDog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 17:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=61058#comment-75111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-75044&quot;&gt;Larry-Klamath River&lt;/a&gt;.

Alfalfa is a high water - low value crop that is sent out of California for animal feed.  The farmers in the north state also have refused to implement low water use irrigation practices for the vast majority of their crops, which means a large percentage of the irrigation water being used is lost to evaporation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-75044">Larry-Klamath River</a>.</p>
<p>Alfalfa is a high water &#8211; low value crop that is sent out of California for animal feed.  The farmers in the north state also have refused to implement low water use irrigation practices for the vast majority of their crops, which means a large percentage of the irrigation water being used is lost to evaporation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SkippingDog		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-75109</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SkippingDog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 17:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=61058#comment-75109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-75087&quot;&gt;Wayne Lusvardi&lt;/a&gt;.

Your own story from 2011 acknowledges the 80% number, even though you tried to undercut it by eliminating the water used to support the environment - you know, those wetlands, wildlife refuges, and the evil Delta Smelt.

&quot;But if you want to define the total amount of water broadly to be only the amount of “developed” water for urban and agricultural uses, then the percentages for agricultural use would be 78 percent in a wet year, 79 percent in an average year, and 80 percent in a dry year.

To arrive at a high percentage of agricultural water use of from 78 percent to 80 percent, you have to exclude that the environment gets 35 percent to 64 percent of all the dedicated water.  This might be construed as lying with statistics to puff up the number.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-75087">Wayne Lusvardi</a>.</p>
<p>Your own story from 2011 acknowledges the 80% number, even though you tried to undercut it by eliminating the water used to support the environment &#8211; you know, those wetlands, wildlife refuges, and the evil Delta Smelt.</p>
<p>&#8220;But if you want to define the total amount of water broadly to be only the amount of “developed” water for urban and agricultural uses, then the percentages for agricultural use would be 78 percent in a wet year, 79 percent in an average year, and 80 percent in a dry year.</p>
<p>To arrive at a high percentage of agricultural water use of from 78 percent to 80 percent, you have to exclude that the environment gets 35 percent to 64 percent of all the dedicated water.  This might be construed as lying with statistics to puff up the number.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wayne Lusvardi		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-75087</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wayne Lusvardi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=61058#comment-75087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-74982&quot;&gt;SkippingDog&lt;/a&gt;.

The State Dept. of Water Resources states agriculture uses 42% of all system water on average.  In a wet year it uses 28%.  

The greatest variation is water use is environmental water which is 35% in a dry year and 64% in a wet year.  It is wet year use that really counts because those years are when California stores up surplus water for droughts. The environment gets 4 million more acre feet of water in a wet year; agriculture gets 7 million acre feet less.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-74982">SkippingDog</a>.</p>
<p>The State Dept. of Water Resources states agriculture uses 42% of all system water on average.  In a wet year it uses 28%.  </p>
<p>The greatest variation is water use is environmental water which is 35% in a dry year and 64% in a wet year.  It is wet year use that really counts because those years are when California stores up surplus water for droughts. The environment gets 4 million more acre feet of water in a wet year; agriculture gets 7 million acre feet less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ulysses Uhaul		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-75058</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ulysses Uhaul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=61058#comment-75058</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know , if biologically, do loons, trolls and doomers drink more water than the truth tellers?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know , if biologically, do loons, trolls and doomers drink more water than the truth tellers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Larry-Klamath River		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-75044</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry-Klamath River]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=61058#comment-75044</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-74982&quot;&gt;SkippingDog&lt;/a&gt;.

What happens with the water in the northern part of the state is called food production.  Hay feeds cattle and we eat the cattle.  The other products are also necessary to carry on human life.  Arguing against filling swimming pools, I will take food production every time.  Not to add, bad environmental policy of allowing fresh water to flow into the ocean where it is lost forever.  And, I believe that the water in the southern part of the state comes from Colorado, and without it the southern part of the state could all go back to the dessert that it once was.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-74982">SkippingDog</a>.</p>
<p>What happens with the water in the northern part of the state is called food production.  Hay feeds cattle and we eat the cattle.  The other products are also necessary to carry on human life.  Arguing against filling swimming pools, I will take food production every time.  Not to add, bad environmental policy of allowing fresh water to flow into the ocean where it is lost forever.  And, I believe that the water in the southern part of the state comes from Colorado, and without it the southern part of the state could all go back to the dessert that it once was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SkippingDog		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-74982</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SkippingDog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=61058#comment-74982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Over 80% of the water in California goes to agricultural demand, and over 50% of that goes to high water/low value crops such as hay.  The hay then gets shipped to other states.  Then we have the idiots in Glenn County who use vast amounts of water to grow rice in the middle of a near desert.

There&#039;s lots of water still in California.  It&#039;s just being misused and largely wasted by the agribusiness cabal in the northern part of our state.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over 80% of the water in California goes to agricultural demand, and over 50% of that goes to high water/low value crops such as hay.  The hay then gets shipped to other states.  Then we have the idiots in Glenn County who use vast amounts of water to grow rice in the middle of a near desert.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s lots of water still in California.  It&#8217;s just being misused and largely wasted by the agribusiness cabal in the northern part of our state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Steele, Manager		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/24/sen-boxer-conservation-would-solve-drought/#comment-74926</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Steele, Manager]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 23:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=61058#comment-74926</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is America!  We should NEVER be forced to conserve-- EVER----I say melt the ice caps more and bottle it-- massive desal plante EVERYwhere-- invade other &quot;little&quot; nations for their water etc---  we must be free to waste as much water as we can enjoy wasting cause we got dem ol freedoms baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaby!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is America!  We should NEVER be forced to conserve&#8211; EVER&#8212;-I say melt the ice caps more and bottle it&#8211; massive desal plante EVERYwhere&#8211; invade other &#8220;little&#8221; nations for their water etc&#8212;  we must be free to waste as much water as we can enjoy wasting cause we got dem ol freedoms baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaby!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-15 00:40:16 by W3 Total Cache
-->