Comments on: UC Berkeley prof behind invest/spend semantic ploy

By: Queeg

Queeg — Sat, 14 Jun 2014 04:04:52 +0000

Teddy….is he constipated?

By: Bud Led Ted S.

Bud Led Ted S. — Sat, 14 Jun 2014 03:31:21 +0000

Sean-

And who are you dependent on for income?

Are you “a turd” sir?

By: Seanmorhamcpoly

Seanmorhamcpoly — Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:04:31 +0000

A Berkley stooge, dependent on the state for his income. One of many turds, who could not run a parking lot car wash. What a worthless ass.

By: Richard Rider

Richard Rider — Fri, 13 Jun 2014 04:58:07 +0000

In reply to Queeg.

Let’s put HSR back on the ballot, and see just how many people agree with Queeg. I’m betting 30%.

IF Queeg and the Dems thought they had the backing of the voters on this, they’d do it. They SHOULD return to the ballot — given that today’s HSR is only a distant descendant of the lie-riddled original ballot measure that passed.

No way HSR backers will risk putting it back on the ballot — unless Democrats decide that it’s best to let the voters take the “blame” for stopping this train wreck.

The frisky part of me hopes they go ahead with this HSR disaster. It will be like the Pyramids — a strange rusting structure out in the wilderness serving no discernible purpose — a monument to government stupidity. Without even the tourist draw of the older pyramids.

By: Queeg

Queeg — Fri, 13 Jun 2014 03:57:41 +0000

Money is going for the bullet train…….plain an simple…….the best investment Californians could rally behind…….

By: Ricky65

Ricky65 — Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:40:58 +0000

Nothing new here. Dema-Rats know the T-word (or more taxes) is a toxic term and avoid its use in public at all costs.
Instead they use terms like ‘investments’, ‘enhanced revenues’ or ‘additional resources’ as euphemisms to fool the low information voter.
I find it humorous to hear a D-Rat refer to their terms of office as ‘public service’or ‘serving the public’.
Actually you can think of it as pretty much the same fashion as when a bull ‘services’ a cow.