Comments on: Sick leave bill could kill jobs, cut hours https://calwatchdog.com/2014/06/17/sick-leave-bill-could-kill-jobs-cut-hours/ Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:09:33 +0000 hourly 1 By: doug https://calwatchdog.com/2014/06/17/sick-leave-bill-could-kill-jobs-cut-hours/#comment-85733 Thu, 19 Jun 2014 00:11:14 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=64873#comment-85733 these dems dont own a business.
sick twice in two years? you cant afford that? i bet they spent more money at disneyland and spent more than a day’s pay.
eight kids? i cant afford eight kids, i dont plan on more.
everybody has a choice for jobs and kids.
those eight kids should maybe help dad out for all his hard time working.
its a family right??????

]]> By: Ronald Stein https://calwatchdog.com/2014/06/17/sick-leave-bill-could-kill-jobs-cut-hours/#comment-85650 Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:53:25 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=64873#comment-85650 Our government and special interest groups have done a great job of marketing. We continue to “camouflage” more regulations, more taxes, and fees on businesses, and force the financially challenged to disproportionally pick up the costs that trickle down from businesses to their pocket books for products and services?

Those that earn less than $20 per hour, which includes virtually all those in the food and hospitality industries, are the ones that can least afford higher costs for power, transportation fuels, and food. There is minimal impact to those that can afford the results of our relentless business unfriendly efforts, but little hope for those that barely exist at today’s cost of living.

If you can remember several decades back, most couples could survive on one income. However, today most couples are two income families just to tread water in today’s costly economy.

The method to counteract the ever increasing costs to the financially challenged, from the costs of over regulations, over taxation, and uncontrollable fees on businesses that trickle down to the pocket books of the financially challenged, is to raise the minimum wage for the financially challenged. BUT WAIT….is this a camouflaged Ponzi scheme, or just a way to buy votes from the financially challenged?

]]>